| Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban (940953) | |
|
|
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
| (940953) | |
Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 12 21:03:02 2012 Reuters
|
|
| (940954) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat May 12 21:10:08 2012, in response to Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 12 21:03:02 2012. Does the law specifically mention Islam? If so, is that constitutional? At the very least it's un-American. The article should cite some text so that we know, but it doesn't and neither do the others that I found. |
|
| (940955) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 12 21:38:00 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Easy on Sat May 12 21:10:08 2012. And if it doesn't, then there goes Rabbinical law too. But I guess nobody cares ... |
|
| (940956) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat May 12 21:39:44 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 12 21:38:00 2012. Good. |
|
| (940958) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by JohnL on Sat May 12 21:47:50 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 12 21:38:00 2012. When events like this happen, that’s no bad thing. |
|
| (940959) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 12 21:48:18 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Easy on Sat May 12 21:10:08 2012. Get off the lib pills. Has to do with foreign legal codes. Would you allow Catholic Canon Law to adjudicate over US law too? |
|
| (940960) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat May 12 21:49:47 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 12 21:48:18 2012. So why ban one and not the other? |
|
| (940961) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 12 21:50:30 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Easy on Sat May 12 21:49:47 2012. What are you talking about? Go read the Supremacy Clause. |
|
| (940962) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 12 21:57:50 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat May 12 21:39:44 2012. I'm always amused at conservative's inability to detect the law of unintended consequences and cheer shit like this on. :( |
|
| (940963) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 12 21:58:35 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Easy on Sat May 12 21:49:47 2012. There ya go! :) |
|
| (940964) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat May 12 22:03:41 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by JohnL on Sat May 12 21:47:50 2012. +1 |
|
| (940967) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Sat May 12 22:13:03 2012, in response to Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 12 21:03:02 2012. Banning something against democracy and the principles of the US is against the US?""People will ask, 'How narrow has that state become?'" Owens said. "How unwelcoming is this state?"" State is so narrow and unwelcoming as to protect LGBT, women, and minorities? Well if a judge can overturn the voters as they did in a nearby state, i guess a judge can 'save' kansas, state with a strong economy I think i hear. |
|
| (940968) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Sat May 12 22:14:03 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat May 12 22:03:41 2012. +1 to the para-police force the so called 'occupiers' have for protecting their rapist too. |
|
| (940969) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Sat May 12 22:15:01 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Easy on Sat May 12 21:10:08 2012. Sounds like they ban international law. Unlike Mauritania, I applaud Kansas for banning slavery. |
|
| (940971) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sat May 12 22:18:06 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 12 21:57:50 2012. What leads you to think its unintended? |
|
| (940972) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 12 22:19:30 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Dave on Sat May 12 22:18:06 2012. Because I'd hate to think that people are consciously supporting things that just might come down on their own ass some day. :( |
|
| (940974) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sat May 12 22:22:24 2012, in response to Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 12 21:03:02 2012. Has anyone read the actual legislation? I'm curious as to how it defines "foreign" law. Religious law? Non-US law? Non-Kansas law? |
|
| (940980) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Sat May 12 22:51:00 2012, in response to Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 12 21:03:02 2012. Mast said research showed more than 50 cases around the United States where courts or government agencies took laws from Sharia or other legal systems into account ... in regard to women's and children's rights," said…Reuters· 4 hours ago |
|
| (940982) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Sat May 12 23:08:58 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Dave on Sat May 12 22:22:24 2012. I can't even find what the legislation number is or it in search!Just this from one article that at least gave me a name which doesn't help. The other bill passed by the House, dubbed the "Kansas Laws for Kansas Courts Act," prohibits judges from making any ruling based on a foreign or religious law that is contrary to the state or federal Constitution. It doesn’t specifically mention sharia in order to distinguish itself from an Oklahoma law already declared unconstitutional. |
|
| (941002) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun May 13 06:21:41 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Easy on Sat May 12 21:10:08 2012. It looks like it is a law with zero effect.It doesn't ban the use of Sharia, Rabbinical Law, or Canon Law, for internal use by an organization to set its own rules. It doesn't ban contracts that agree to use one of those to settle disputes. And of course they never had any validity in government law to begin with. |
|
| (941017) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun May 13 10:54:59 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by AlM on Sun May 13 06:21:41 2012. It looks like it is a law with zero effect.Not so. There can be cases where a religious court issues a decision and it is ignored by the losing party, e.g., a contractual dispute. The winning party can then go to civil (secular) court to enforce the judgement. This is quite common in cases where private arbitration is used to settle a dispute and the losing party refuses to abide by the decision. |
|
| (941288) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon May 14 10:51:37 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by JohnL on Sat May 12 21:47:50 2012. When events like this happen, that’s no bad thing.None of those events have any basis in Rabbinic law, and no ban on Rabbinic law would stop those events. |
|
| (941291) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon May 14 10:53:57 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon May 14 10:51:37 2012. IAWTP. |
|
| (942034) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by TERRapin station on Wed May 16 09:18:38 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by JohnL on Sat May 12 21:47:50 2012. You used to be cool. Now you're an anti-Semite, calling those disgusting acts "rabbinic law"? WTF is wrong with you? |
|
| (942035) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by TERRapin station on Wed May 16 09:19:09 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat May 12 22:03:41 2012. No, he's wrong. |
|
| (942036) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by TERRapin station on Wed May 16 09:19:43 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon May 14 10:51:37 2012. Exactly. Notice how he failed to apologize. |
|
| (942037) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by TERRapin station on Wed May 16 09:19:59 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by AlM on Mon May 14 10:53:57 2012. Thanks. |
|
| (942039) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 16 09:26:42 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon May 14 10:51:37 2012. I disagree. People are hiding behind the tenets of their religion when it comes to avoiding secular justice. Not coöperating with gentile governments made sense in olden times in the old country when the Tsar was the enemy (and who properly got what was coming to him in 1918), but that is not true anymore. The police do not serve a worthless prince or potentate, they serve the people, including the people of this community. |
|
| (942040) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 16 09:27:08 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by TERRapin station on Wed May 16 09:19:43 2012. Why would this justify an apology? |
|
| (942041) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by TERRapin station on Wed May 16 09:42:14 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 16 09:27:08 2012. Because he called disgusting acts rabbinic law when they are not. |
|
| (942042) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by TERRapin station on Wed May 16 09:42:51 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 16 09:26:42 2012. But that's not rabbinic law. |
|
| (942044) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 16 09:48:30 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by TERRapin station on Wed May 16 09:42:51 2012. Why does that matter? |
|
| (942047) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed May 16 10:14:49 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 16 09:48:30 2012. Because abolition of rabbinic law (i.e., denying its use as a basis for arbitration, which is probably an unconstitutional impingement on contracts and not what the Kansas bill does anyway) would not prevent clannish groups from protecting miscreants in their midst. |
|
| (942054) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 16 10:56:34 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by AlM on Wed May 16 10:14:49 2012. Yes, but as I've stated elsewhere, there are references in the article to encouraging complainants to instead have the cases settled in their own community court rather than the government's courts. |
|
| (942062) | |
Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed May 16 11:40:04 2012, in response to Re: Kansas lawmakers pass Sharia Law ban, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 16 10:56:34 2012. I don't see how any law issued by the government can ever prevent that sort of encouragement. This is always the case with closely-knit groups. Even if you could constitutionally forbid binding arbitration based on religious law, you can't ever outlaw non-binding arbitration that has the social force of the community behind it. |
|