|
|
| Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT (928088) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (928247) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Fri Apr 6 18:10:10 2012, in response to Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by DAND124 on Fri Apr 6 12:13:30 2012. Bush was cursed out for having job growth numbers 3 times as strong as this. |
|
|
| (928267) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Apr 6 19:32:23 2012, in response to Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Apr 6 12:09:29 2012. I know, it could be better -- but, jobs ARE being created -- unlike in the last Bush year. |
|
|
| (928269) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Apr 6 19:43:23 2012, in response to Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by italianstallion on Fri Apr 6 19:32:23 2012. Which is doing pretty well considering ...
|
|
|
| (928273) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Apr 6 20:03:06 2012, in response to Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Apr 6 12:24:33 2012. It was higher during the 80's under Reagan.I know you don't want to hear this, but things are picking up. I see "help wanted" signs up too, see houses being built and see my own business picking up. Nothing by leaps and bounds but it's beginning. your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (928286) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Apr 6 20:29:37 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by Train Dude on Fri Apr 6 16:42:34 2012. I'm guessing that the mother of the shop superintendent was hired to do war work, and stayed on after the end of WWII. However, in this case, I do think bingbong is correct--operating positions in the modern NYCT did not open up to women until the late 1970s, IIRC. |
|
|
| (928288) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri Apr 6 20:37:22 2012, in response to Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Apr 6 12:09:29 2012. I miss the days of 700,000+ jobs being lost every month during the Bush Economic Collapse. |
|
|
| (928292) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Apr 6 20:45:31 2012, in response to Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Apr 6 19:43:23 2012. Assholes. |
|
|
| (928294) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by Rockparkman on Fri Apr 6 20:50:46 2012, in response to Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by italianstallion on Fri Apr 6 20:45:31 2012. We'd be better off if that business went under. |
|
|
| (928299) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Apr 6 21:14:34 2012, in response to Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by italianstallion on Fri Apr 6 20:45:31 2012. Plenty of them around. :( |
|
|
| (928325) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Fri Apr 6 22:34:08 2012, in response to Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Fri Apr 6 12:09:29 2012. Sounds like Nazy Germany. Although a few at the top would like to recreate their methods, they also had to mess around with things to lower the jobs universe to bring things back. |
|
|
| (928328) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Fri Apr 6 22:41:20 2012, in response to Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by italianstallion on Fri Apr 6 19:32:23 2012. the Congressional Budget Office estimated on Friday, including a $196 billion hole in March, marking the 40th straight month of deficits.....means the government has never run a surplus in any month during President Obama’s tenure. The longest previous deficit streak on record was 11 months. *** Another record for the worst recovery ever recorded! |
|
|
| (928330) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Apr 6 22:44:06 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Fri Apr 6 17:07:44 2012. Heh. The figure-fudgers in charge . . . |
|
|
| (928336) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Apr 6 23:13:32 2012, in response to Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by SMAZ on Fri Apr 6 20:37:22 2012. I do too, back when deficits didn't matter.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (928345) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Apr 7 00:28:37 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by JayZeeBMT on Fri Apr 6 20:29:37 2012. I'm still waiting for someone to post proof of that. When I got to NYCT there were women there with seniority in operating titles. It seems that the only two people insisting that this is not true are two people who are not known for their accuracy in recounting history (They are both full of shit). |
|
|
| (928347) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Apr 7 01:20:43 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by Train Dude on Sat Apr 7 00:28:37 2012. Since you're good at pulling records, why not just go back to the early to mid 1970's and find one ... you're the one who claims there WERE women, find one. |
|
|
| (928379) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sat Apr 7 09:28:23 2012, in response to Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Apr 6 13:13:23 2012. Precisely.Not everything is Obama's, or any president's, fault. |
|
|
| (928381) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sat Apr 7 09:30:35 2012, in response to The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by Train Dude on Fri Apr 6 14:16:22 2012. Women have lower IQ's (by about 4 points on average) than men. They also lead different lives (e.g., greater number of SAHM's). There's no reason to expect that the employment rates would be the same between the sexes. |
|
|
| (928382) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Apr 7 09:31:48 2012, in response to Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Apr 6 13:13:23 2012. We're nearing my predicted scenario where half of the U.S. is subsidized to purchase from the other half.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (928386) | |
Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sat Apr 7 09:35:33 2012, in response to Re: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT, posted by Fred G on Sat Apr 7 09:31:48 2012. Yes—an inevitable consequence of both the advent of automation and the diminishing average IQ of the population. I predicted the former problem at least a decade ago... |
|
|
| (928413) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Apr 7 11:41:12 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by JayMan on Sat Apr 7 09:30:35 2012. 
|
|
|
| (928414) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Apr 7 11:48:31 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by JayMan on Sat Apr 7 09:30:35 2012. I find that hard to believe, not from some lab testing results but from actual behavior. I know a multitude of women who have prevented their men from doing some really stupid things. Seriously, I would look for a flaw in the IQ tests there.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (928417) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Apr 7 12:23:59 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by JayMan on Sat Apr 7 09:30:35 2012. Based on one specific woman who posts here, I'd say 4 points is very conservative. |
|
|
| (928437) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Apr 7 13:16:59 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by Train Dude on Sat Apr 7 12:23:59 2012.
|
|
|
| (928438) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Apr 7 13:22:38 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by bingbong on Sat Apr 7 13:16:59 2012. You are literally too stupid to insult but that's part of your charm. |
|
|
| (928451) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Apr 7 13:38:12 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by Train Dude on Sat Apr 7 13:22:38 2012. 
|
|
|
| (928642) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sat Apr 7 21:50:25 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by Fred G on Sat Apr 7 11:48:31 2012. Haha yes behind every great man...But yes, on average, women do have lower IQ. They also have a lower standard deviation, which means they are more clustered about the average; there are more men at both extremes (genius and ignoramus). But the edge that men have is in non-verbal reasoning, especially spatial reasoning. Women have an edge at verbal reasoning that allows them to tie men on certain IQ tests. The edge at verbal reasoning might be why great men need their women... ;) |
|
|
| (928643) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sat Apr 7 21:50:51 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by bingbong on Sat Apr 7 11:41:12 2012. I hope you're not directing that at me... |
|
|
| (928648) | |
Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Apr 7 23:56:38 2012, in response to Re: The Real War Against Women (was: Unemployment at 8.2%, BUT), posted by JayMan on Sat Apr 7 21:50:51 2012. Nah ... it's that clown a couple of messages back ... the one who stalks her. The one that Arizona wants to know about. :) |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||