Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7]

< Previous Page  

Page 6 of 7

Next Page >  

(926563)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 2 07:44:49 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 06:02:03 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL!!

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(926564)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 2 07:44:54 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 06:02:03 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL!!

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(926565)

view threaded

Re: U.S. Corporate Tax Rate (was: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF)

Posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 2 07:46:17 2012, in response to Re: U.S. Corporate Tax Rate (was: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF), posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 06:20:06 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
If they lower the tax rate we'll still be making up the difference.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(926566)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 2 07:47:39 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 2 07:44:49 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Good Dan Lawrence imitation, btw. :)

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(926575)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 08:12:44 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 2 07:44:54 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Uhm, you can't take a joke? LMAO. Go eat your delicious subway sandwich.

Post a New Response

(926576)

view threaded

Re: U.S. Corporate Tax Rate (was: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF)

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 08:13:15 2012, in response to Re: U.S. Corporate Tax Rate (was: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF), posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 2 07:46:17 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Yes, but the difference is lower.

Post a New Response

(926578)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 08:18:36 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 2 07:47:39 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
???
Because I am playing with your Subway comment? I rarely eat Subway in New York, why would I eat it in some other location? I don't generally eat chain food when I am away, as I like to try different things that I can't get home. I don't care if they charge $3 for heros in San Fran....
It's even more funny that you took my post literally and seriously too.

Post a New Response

(926581)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Apr 2 08:31:41 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Mar 31 22:23:46 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
It takes more than just employee to run a subway...

So you agree it's not really the minimum wage.

Post a New Response

(926583)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Apr 2 08:33:22 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 2 00:36:48 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL, I'll never go to a SF Subway again!

Or as the article says, I'll take "a trip over a bridge, through a tunnel, or onto the Peninsula" to save the fifty cents.

Post a New Response

(926584)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Apr 2 08:34:34 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 06:02:03 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
There's plenty better places to eat, so I probably won't either

Like the first comment to the article says, you can get a better $5 sandwich at the independent place down the street.

Post a New Response

(926598)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by AlM on Mon Apr 2 09:19:23 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 31 22:35:55 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
And yet that place is booming more and more every day. Go figure ...

It's simple. The demand for products and services is so high (because people want to live there) that businesses can charge the high prices, and landlords can charge the high rents.




Post a New Response

(926603)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 2 10:08:58 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 08:18:36 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL and here I was thinking it was you taking my post seriously. Damn we missed April Fools by a day.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(926618)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Mon Apr 2 11:13:10 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 2 10:08:58 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Its food man...you know I love my food....

Post a New Response

(926619)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Mon Apr 2 11:15:02 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Apr 2 08:31:41 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I never said it was. Thats one factor of many. Regulation in general has a negative effect in many business environments.

Post a New Response

(926620)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Mon Apr 2 11:15:58 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Apr 2 08:34:34 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Of course...as with most locations. But those businesses also charge more in toxic business environments too.

Post a New Response

(926659)

view threaded

Re: U.S. Corporate Tax Rate (was: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF)

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Apr 2 13:24:02 2012, in response to Re: U.S. Corporate Tax Rate (was: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF), posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 05:57:16 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You'll notice how selkook brags about his not paying any corporate taxes and even getting some corporate welfare. Meanwhile bing-bong is playing all weepy, while she's trying to get her snout into the free medical care trough and then they both want everyone else should pay more so they can continue their free ride.

Post a New Response

(926771)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 18:11:10 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Mon Apr 2 11:15:02 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
In SF, it's the rents. Just like midtown.

Post a New Response

(926776)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 18:16:53 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by AlM on Mon Apr 2 09:19:23 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Precisely. And the paychecks are just as large except for the lowest rung on the economic ladder which is why SF is trying to do something about that. But don't try to explain to conservatards that there parts of America that aren't like their precious Ozarks. :-\

Post a New Response

(926790)

view threaded

Re: U.S. Corporate Tax Rate (was: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF)

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 18:50:51 2012, in response to Re: U.S. Corporate Tax Rate (was: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF), posted by Train Dude on Mon Apr 2 13:24:02 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Or maybe, just maybe it's that unlike you conservatards, she's concerned about other people? Nah ...

You COULD do like we do and give up a nice piece of your "revenue" for the benefit of your community - it's called "charitable contributions" and it's deductable. But then again, people like you would never help others now would you? That'd be "librul" ...

Post a New Response

(926802)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by italianstallion on Mon Apr 2 19:14:05 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by TonyG on Mon Apr 2 00:24:56 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
HaHaHaHa! As usual, much right-wing ado about nothing.

Post a New Response

(926811)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Mon Apr 2 19:51:42 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by italianstallion on Mon Apr 2 19:14:05 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
????????? Right wing? How is this a left or right issue?

Post a New Response

(926833)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 20:27:30 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Mon Apr 2 19:51:42 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Perhaps because only the righties are squawking about any of this as though it were some sort of religious service? Maybe?

Post a New Response

(926839)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by bingbong on Mon Apr 2 20:33:31 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 20:27:30 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Additive laced fast food? You betcha!

Post a New Response

(926872)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by TonyG on Mon Apr 2 21:19:12 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by TonyG on Mon Apr 2 00:24:56 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Actually it varies. After further research some sandwiches are $5.50 and others are $6.00.

Post a New Response

(926875)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by TonyG on Mon Apr 2 21:21:28 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Apr 2 08:33:22 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You'll pay that $0.50 in gas to get to the nearest peninsula Subway or pay $5 - $6 in toll fees if you cross a bridge.

You're better up just sucking it up and paying the extra $0.50 - $1.00.

Post a New Response

(926882)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 21:37:53 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 20:27:30 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Religious? You know how I feel about organized religion, so fail.

Post a New Response

(926883)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 21:39:15 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 21:37:53 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
And you know how I feel about republican squawking points, so fail there too. :)

Post a New Response

(926890)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 2 21:42:54 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by TonyG on Mon Apr 2 21:19:12 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Don't ruin Italianstallion's circle jerk.

Post a New Response

(926937)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by italianstallion on Mon Apr 2 22:23:31 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Mon Apr 2 19:51:42 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The thread started as an attack on the minimum wage.

Post a New Response

(926942)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 22:27:57 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by italianstallion on Mon Apr 2 22:23:31 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
... which of course democrats are opposed to and republicans want to protect. :)

Post a New Response

(926946)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 2 22:31:04 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 20:27:30 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Also only right-wingers would have the bad taste to actually buy some nasty-ass sandwich at Subway.

Post a New Response

(926952)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Apr 2 22:39:25 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 2 22:31:04 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Yes extreme right wingers like JayZeeBMT - I'm guessing?

Post a New Response

(926956)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by Easy on Mon Apr 2 22:45:45 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by Train Dude on Mon Apr 2 22:39:25 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Was the Subway Summit his idea? I can eat Subway sometimes, but most of the time something about it really turns me off. I'm getting pickier as I get older too.

Post a New Response

(926957)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Apr 2 22:47:52 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by Easy on Mon Apr 2 22:45:45 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
No - actually I lost a bet to him and the bet was for a Subway Sandwich. Of course he could have nixed that idea and insisted in Wendy's or Popeyes instead. I don't even remember what the bet was.

Post a New Response

(926959)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 2 22:50:56 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by Easy on Mon Apr 2 22:45:45 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
What's up with the smell in that place?

It's almost as bad as the Taco Bell smell.

Does PATH own those places?

Post a New Response

(926962)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by Easy on Mon Apr 2 22:58:56 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 2 22:50:56 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah, with Subway it's the smell more than the food for me although I'm not a big fan of the food either. I haven't eaten Taco Bell in decades so I can't comment on its smell.

Post a New Response

(926964)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 2 23:00:18 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by Easy on Mon Apr 2 22:58:56 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I haven't eaten Taco Bell in decades so I can't comment on its smell.

me either, but I've been inside of it with friends a couple of times in the last decade and the smell is still bad.

Post a New Response

(926965)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by TonyG on Mon Apr 2 23:10:49 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 22:27:57 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I am opposed to it as it messes up the market forces and often times harms those that it's meant to help.

Post a New Response

(926968)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 23:14:54 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 2 22:31:04 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I tried them once when I worked for the state. I'll take Blimpie, more meat. :)

Post a New Response

(926980)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 23:22:52 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by TonyG on Mon Apr 2 23:10:49 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
In all my life, I've never earned anywhere near minimum wage myself. But I've seen folks, particularly in retail earning at or only a few pennies above it and their lives suck. I can almost go for the logic of low pay for "trainees" with no experience, but if the minimum wage went away, folks with 20 years experience would probably see their pay sink.

May not be an answer, but certainly makes me understand that collecting welfare might be the better life choice if you can't afford to eat on a 40 hour paycheck.

Post a New Response

(926985)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by TonyG on Mon Apr 2 23:29:28 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 23:22:52 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I've worked near minimum wage in college. The problem is that when it is raised it decreases profit margins and can cause the business to make do with less employees. So while the employees that remain benefit those let go and / or not hired do not.

Post a New Response

(926987)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 23:39:17 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by TonyG on Mon Apr 2 23:29:28 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
If a business shrinks their ranks over such things, then they either had an excess to begin with (unlikely) or their customer service will go down quickly as a result, and so will they. Such arguments are only bullshit threats, sorry to say.

Post a New Response

(927050)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Tue Apr 3 01:20:11 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by Easy on Mon Apr 2 22:58:56 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah, with Subway it's the smell more than the food for me although I'm not a big fan of the food either

About two or three years ago, a Subway opened up near my employer's office, and I was happy to have some easy access to one. So what was once a weekly affair returned to something that I eat once in a while. It really isn't that good, and FWIW, for nearly the same cost, I'd rather get a real hero from the pizzeria next door with prosciutto and mozzarella...

Post a New Response

(927053)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SMAZ on Tue Apr 3 01:57:21 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 2 23:14:54 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I'll take anything at Bambino, Kickshaw or some halal place in Astoria anytime.

That Subway even exists and somehow remains in business in Queens is one of humanity's great unsolved mysteries.


Post a New Response

(927059)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 3 02:09:48 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SMAZ on Tue Apr 3 01:57:21 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Ah well ... same here. Tried it once with coworkers, thought they were insane, and never went back. Same for most of the other "franchise" joints. Apparently "subway" appeals to conservatards, I prefer real food. You can get that up here no problem. :)

I guess it's good to know though that Obama is doing SUCH a good job despite the republican congress that there's so little that needs fixing that this issue's risen to the top of the agenda. Heh.

Post a New Response

(927061)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 3 02:11:56 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 3 02:09:48 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
BTW: we had a Quizno's up here for a couple of months. I was curious. But by the time I finally got around to going there, they'd already gone out of business. Chain food doesn't do too good up here. :)

Post a New Response

(927067)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Apr 3 02:19:35 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 3 02:11:56 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
That has nothing to do with it. Quizno's overexpanded and a lot of them went out of business.

Post a New Response

(927082)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Apr 3 03:04:31 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Apr 3 02:19:35 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Doesn't change the fact that with the exception of the tourist areas and by the airport, chain restaurants don't do all that well around here. As far as I know, that was the only one in the immediate area, so if they folded, it wasn't because there were too many of them here.

Post a New Response

(927170)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Apr 3 13:16:46 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 2 22:31:04 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Actually, it's the lefties that said they would buy it for the higher price. I was actually one that said I wouldn't even buy Subway in NY, why would I buy it when I am away. Fail.

Post a New Response

(927171)

view threaded

Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Apr 3 13:18:50 2012, in response to Re: No more $5 footlongs at Subway in SF, posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 2 22:50:56 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
McDonalds is way worse.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7]

< Previous Page  

Page 6 of 7

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]