|
|
| Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! (918774) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (919015) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Mar 12 00:48:45 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Mar 12 00:07:11 2012. You dont have a clue as to what I believe is "important" or not tome,so stop making this personal.. I could care less what some pundit from the right have to say or their supporters who wear a face of apathy when exposed to their special brand of bulldungary... Who cares what they say?.. you do..but frontin about it made you stand out like a purple thumb. |
|
|
| (919020) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Mar 12 01:07:35 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 00:00:34 2012. these guys are so full of shit.. |
|
|
| (919056) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Mar 12 07:40:00 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by Edwards! on Mon Mar 12 00:48:45 2012. LOL!!!!! I care what they say? Uhm, no, I am not the one that brings them up, nor discusses what they say.... People on the left do, such as you, just look at this post I am responding to! |
|
|
| (919057) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 07:43:11 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by Train Dude on Mon Mar 12 00:28:44 2012. You probably think Sarah Palin is intelligent.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (919058) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 07:47:51 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Mar 12 00:09:01 2012. I dont think anyone here watches FOX news or hangs onto every word that somebody like Palin says. This stuff makes the rounds and some of us are just aware of it. It's like a Jon Stewart clip or any other piece of info that gets around the internet.I'll remember that remark about Pelosi next time she gets brought up here. your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (919059) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 07:48:35 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by Edwards! on Mon Mar 12 01:07:35 2012. Indeed...real hypocrisy.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (919061) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Mar 12 08:11:12 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 07:47:51 2012. dont think anyone here watches FOX news or hangs onto every word that somebody like Palin says. This stuff makes the rounds and some of us are just aware of it. It's like a Jon Stewart clip or any other piece of info that gets around the internet.Funny. No one watches it, but all the people here that post about them seem to know exactly what they are saying all the time. You know, those same people that say they don't need to be told by leftist blogs how to think. I'll remember that remark about Pelosi next time she gets brought up here. Please do. |
|
|
| (919065) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 08:19:15 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Mar 12 08:11:12 2012. Nobody's being told what to think. This stuff shows up on social networks like Facebook all the time and was shared to get to there and is further shared to get here. Stuff just gets around.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (919104) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Mar 12 14:11:21 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 07:43:11 2012. More so than Nancy Pelosi. |
|
|
| (919138) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Mar 12 17:04:26 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 08:19:15 2012. If the shit wasn't downright funny every time some of these geniuses flap their gums, we wouldn't know who they were. :) |
|
|
| (919143) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 17:23:12 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Mar 12 17:04:26 2012. Hehe, true. I knew it was here with my eyes closed -_-your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (919148) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 17:29:31 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 17:23:12 2012. Hehe, true. I knew it was her with my eyes closed -_-your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (919154) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Mar 12 17:45:32 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 17:29:31 2012. Nothing like "attractive, intelligent and successful women" to make one's comedy day. :) |
|
|
| (919160) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by Rockparkman on Mon Mar 12 18:00:17 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by The Silence on Sun Mar 11 23:01:53 2012. Fuck you, Mr. businessman. After WWII, we had Harry S. Truman, a former storekeeper as President. he gave away the peace by not equitably dividing the world as was agreed to at Yalta. If we had someone versed in international law instead of that incompetent, we would have a British dominated western Europe, a Soviet sphere confined to Eastern Europe and Russia Proper, an American Pacific Rim and a free, non aligned bloc of China, India, etc. Businessmen CANNOT DO PUBLIC POLICY.btw, this is why i hate that son of a whore Olog-hai. |
|
|
| (921112) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Sun Mar 18 11:47:54 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Mar 12 17:45:32 2012. We knew Palin was a pretty zero when Tina started playing Palin on SNL and was an instant hit. :) |
|
|
| (921122) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Mar 18 13:24:04 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by Elkeeper on Sun Mar 11 21:30:38 2012. Yes, Ms.Palin does babble on similar to a mad moose. |
|
|
| (921123) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sun Mar 18 13:24:19 2012, in response to Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Mar 11 12:47:08 2012. Hold on. Before we hit Palin too hard:1. We know she's an idiot. IQ is essentially fixed for life. You're not magically going to develop more of it. Ergo, we shouldn't be surprised when she says stupid things, nor she we keep seeking proof of her idiocy. 2. Actually, that was a pretty succinct description of the current mainstream Republican view on race, which is expectantly confused and incoherent. I don't think most mainstream Republicans subscribe to HBD but hold this view of racial issues (from http://www.nas.org/articles/Achievement_Gap_Politics): The second view, what I'll call the conservative view of the achievement gap, also focuses on student values. But instead of encouraging teachers to respect the student's culture, conservatives say that parents and teachers of low-performing students are the cause of the gap, by failing to give the students the correct cultural values. Hard work, family values, commitment to the importance of education, and "no excuses," to quote the Thernstroms, who are major proponents of the conservative view, will close the achievement gap. The conservatives believe that higher standards are the order of the day, and that everyone can achieve if they just work hard. Conservatives hold ed schools in extremely low esteem, and feel that the progressive push to “understand” students and teach simplified (as they see it) curriculum contributes to the problem. The conservative view is held by most politicians of any ideology. Both NCLB and Race to the Top are based on this viewpoint—which comes along with a hefty dose of blame for the teachers, the ed schools that produce them, and the unions that represent them. This is exemplified by the stuff Newt Gingrich says (putting poor minority kids to work cleaning bathrooms and mopping floors), and what Rick Santorum says (when he didn't say "Black"). I will add that likely most Republicans hold this view because it's the only "acceptable" one to have. |
|
|
| (921125) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sun Mar 18 13:27:50 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Mar 11 19:15:17 2012. That is simply never going to happen.Let me rest your mind: Palin has no intention to ever run for President. The 2008 campaign showed her that she couldn't do it. She just likes to keep the idea floating around because that's how she keeps in the spotlight, and that is her bread and butter... |
|
|
| (921127) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sun Mar 18 13:29:22 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Mar 11 20:09:18 2012. Wow....you must have absolutely no grasp of reality if you really believe that... |
|
|
| (921129) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sun Mar 18 13:30:19 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 11 20:57:46 2012. Actually, as much as I'd like to, I can't say that you're completely wrong... |
|
|
| (921130) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sun Mar 18 13:31:26 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Mar 11 21:11:23 2012. She's got two out of three. Well, three, depending on where you set your bar. Where I set mine, she doesn't make it... |
|
|
| (921131) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sun Mar 18 13:33:59 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by bingbong on Sun Mar 11 21:24:18 2012. successful... she RESIGNED, remember?Hold on, while the rest of your stuff is good, on this one, I'd bet that she probably has a lot more money that you do (and certainly a lot more than I do). She taking all that unsuccessfulness all the way to the bank... |
|
|
| (921132) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sun Mar 18 13:35:44 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 12 07:43:11 2012. In comparison.... |
|
|
| (921133) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Mar 18 13:44:22 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by JayMan on Sun Mar 18 13:33:59 2012. Success is a lot more than money in the bank. She may be rich, even as a result, but she is a failure of a politician. |
|
|
| (921135) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Mar 18 13:47:28 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by Rockparkman on Mon Mar 12 18:00:17 2012. That's exactly the reason why Rmoney will be a failure of a President if elected. We did the "CEO" thing recently. He left both the world and economy in a shambles. Let's not do that again. |
|
|
| (921146) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by JohnL on Sun Mar 18 14:36:27 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by bingbong on Sun Mar 18 13:24:04 2012. I think you’re being unfair to the moose. |
|
|
| (921149) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Mar 18 15:13:19 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by bingbong on Sun Mar 11 21:24:18 2012. Yes. We like Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Kathleen Sebelius, Kristen Gillibrand, Hillary Clinton, Gabrielle Giffords - the list of liberal "attractive, intelligent & successful women" is almost infinite. |
|
|
| (921150) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Mar 18 15:15:05 2012, in response to Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Mar 11 12:47:08 2012. Among other things, she can't even get one of our foundational credos right. We were not, as she says "created equally." |
|
|
| (921153) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Mar 18 15:36:31 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by JohnL on Sun Mar 18 14:36:27 2012. I probably am. My bad. :-) |
|
|
| (921155) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Mar 18 15:42:01 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Mar 11 23:35:35 2012. Wrong. They are in the media, on the public airwaves (in the case of Lardmouth). Their content (for lack of a better description) is still being heard by many. They are relevant until they're out of the public arena, a/k/a off the air. |
|
|
| (921156) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Mar 18 15:46:35 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Mar 12 00:07:11 2012. Whether YOU watch Fox is hardly relevant. Fact is, millions do, and Fox must think she has something to say to them, otherwise it wouldn't pay her the big bucks. Murdoch is not in the habit of throwing money away. |
|
|
| (921157) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Mar 18 15:48:59 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by bingbong on Sun Mar 18 15:42:01 2012. Hilarious how some on this board try to pass off Palin and Limbaugh as irrelevant.(Even my spell-checker corrects my misspellings of their names!) |
|
|
| (921158) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Mar 18 15:54:50 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by italianstallion on Sun Mar 18 15:48:59 2012. Sad to say, they aren't. Especially Lardmouth, who they outright fear. Sorry about your spellchecker, perhaps it needs to learn a thing or two. |
|
|
| (921166) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 18 16:39:48 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by italianstallion on Sun Mar 18 15:46:35 2012. And some people watch discovery....some people watch comedy central....some people watch [fill in a blank]…the point. |
|
|
| (921170) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 18 17:05:13 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 18 16:39:48 2012. None of those networks give Palin airtime. |
|
|
| (921174) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Mar 18 17:38:49 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 18 16:39:48 2012. Those aren't political networks whose pundits have the ability to move the national conversation about issues. |
|
|
| (921193) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 18 19:57:50 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 18 17:05:13 2012. She's nothing. Who cares? If people want to listen to her, and she makes a business money, that's their prerogative. Just like listening to Bill Maher, or any other entertainer. |
|
|
| (921194) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 18 19:58:37 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by italianstallion on Sun Mar 18 17:38:49 2012. And MSNBC has their commentators making political statements. Who cares? |
|
|
| (921207) | |
Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert! |
|
|
Posted by Italianstallion on Sun Mar 18 21:14:03 2012, in response to Re: Paging Tina Fey: New Material Alert!, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 18 19:57:50 2012. She may be entertaining, but she is not an entertainer. |
|
|
| (921291) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Mar 19 04:01:12 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Mar 12 00:09:01 2012. i admit.i have SDS sharpton derangement syndrome. i listen to his radio show for same reason the jayzeebmt element cares what palin says. |
|
|
| (921292) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Mar 19 04:10:12 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Mar 19 04:01:12 2012. Hahaha. At least you admit it! The leftists won't admit they wait on every word somone like Palin or Rush says. |
|
|
| (921293) | |
Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Mar 19 04:17:02 2012, in response to Re: Paging leftist hypocrisy, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Mar 19 04:10:12 2012. i love when sharpton says "testosterun". his callers are awesome too. like the lady who wants a receipt for voting. |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||