|
|
| Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' (920361) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
| (920361) | |
Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Fri Mar 16 01:51:37 2012 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/sarah-palin/9094048/Sarah-Palin-believed-Queen-was-in-charge-of-British-forces-in-Iraq.html |
|
|
| (920368) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Mar 16 02:55:08 2012, in response to Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by dand124 on Fri Mar 16 01:51:37 2012. And the surprise here would be? After all ... she's an "attractive, successful and intelligent woman." 'nuff said. :) |
|
|
| (920397) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by Dutchrailnut on Fri Mar 16 05:20:05 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Mar 16 02:55:08 2012. hope you mean the Queen, cause I got my doubts about two out of 3 on Palin |
|
|
| (920399) | |
PDS: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 16 05:22:17 2012, in response to Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by dand124 on Fri Mar 16 01:51:37 2012. It's March now, not February. And what's making you have a sudden burst of Palin Derangement Syndrome? |
|
|
| (920400) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Mar 16 05:23:00 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by Dutchrailnut on Fri Mar 16 05:20:05 2012. Palin, described by Train Dude ... no royals were harmed in this production. :) |
|
|
| (920401) | |
Re: PDS: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Mar 16 05:26:10 2012, in response to PDS: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by Olog-hai on Fri Mar 16 05:22:17 2012. "Palin Derangement" ... love it! I thought you liked her. :) |
|
|
| (920411) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri Mar 16 06:36:31 2012, in response to Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by dand124 on Fri Mar 16 01:51:37 2012. HAHA!!What an idiot. And people here voted to put this moron a heartbeat away from the Presidency. |
|
|
| (920599) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by WayneJay on Fri Mar 16 14:34:31 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Mar 16 02:55:08 2012. Well... try not to be too critical of Palin as you'll be accused of being obsessed with her:-). |
|
|
| (920644) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SLRT on Fri Mar 16 15:13:58 2012, in response to Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by dand124 on Fri Mar 16 01:51:37 2012. Impossible, Freddie was dead before British involvement in Iraq. |
|
|
| (920646) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Fri Mar 16 15:18:56 2012, in response to Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by dand124 on Fri Mar 16 01:51:37 2012. Why am I not surprised to hear that?What would surprise me is seeing a particular person retracting his statement about her. |
|
|
| (920659) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Mar 16 15:54:35 2012, in response to Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by dand124 on Fri Mar 16 01:51:37 2012. Not only that, she didn't know why there were 2 Koreas, she didn't know what the "Fed" was, etc., etc. |
|
|
| (920660) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Fri Mar 16 15:57:57 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by italianstallion on Fri Mar 16 15:54:35 2012. I think the fact that she was totally ignorant to begin with was the least of her problems. Much worse was that she didn't have much interest in learning. |
|
|
| (920674) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 17:17:36 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by bingbong on Fri Mar 16 15:18:56 2012. I'm still waiting for you to retract your idiotic statement about BMW moving to Detroit because the people in South Carolina are too stupid to be trained. |
|
|
| (920675) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 17:18:15 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Mar 16 02:55:08 2012. Unlike any woman you may know |
|
|
| (920699) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Mar 16 18:04:17 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 17:18:15 2012. Yeah, most of the women I know don't herpa-derp. But I know she's a mental giant in YOUR book. :) |
|
|
| (920700) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Mar 16 18:04:57 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by WayneJay on Fri Mar 16 14:34:31 2012. Uh ... yeah. :) |
|
|
| (920814) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sat Mar 17 02:17:54 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by Train Dude on Fri Mar 16 17:17:36 2012. 
|
|
|
| (920833) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sat Mar 17 08:38:05 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Mar 16 02:55:08 2012. Thank you. I don't think Palin came out looking particularly bad in the movie, as it really didn't reveal anything about her we didn't already know... |
|
|
| (920835) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sat Mar 17 08:40:48 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SMAZ on Fri Mar 16 06:36:31 2012. With these people are you surprised?I don't think educated liberals truly understand what they're dealing with in this country's electorate, particularly in the South... |
|
|
| (920837) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Mar 17 08:44:18 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by JayMan on Sat Mar 17 08:38:05 2012. It was a partisan claptrap of a movie. |
|
|
| (920889) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 17 14:44:02 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by JayMan on Sat Mar 17 08:40:48 2012. This is why you DON'T want Santorum as the nominee. Even if it creates a risk of an undesirable,* but nevertheless rational, Romney presidency.*Subject to opinion. I don't really agree that Romney would be a bad president. |
|
|
| (920899) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sat Mar 17 15:04:48 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 17 14:44:02 2012. Wanting Santorum to be the nominee would be rationally analyzing my bets. Santorum being the president would be godawful, but even if he were the nominee the chances of that happening are vanishingly small. Romney has a much better chance of winning, but as you note he wouldn't likely be a horrible president (still quite sub-optimal, though). In short, I'd take the small risk of something really bad happening to ward off the much bigger risk of something fairly bad happening. |
|
|
| (920903) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 17 15:17:56 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by JayMan on Sat Mar 17 15:04:48 2012. I would consider that the small risk, though small, is so disastrous that it's not worth it.The metaphor would be a sort of reverse roulette table: You pick a number, if it lands on any other number, you win $100,000, but if it lands on the number you chose, you lose your house and your entire bank account. Another roulette table has the same odds, but you only bet on Red or Black, and if you lose, then you only lose $10,000, but if you win you only win the same amount (assume you can afford to absorb this). |
|
|
| (920918) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Mar 17 16:11:42 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 17 15:17:56 2012. Taking your analogy 1 step further, Santorum really is like a reverse Lotto.In the very unlikely chance that you lose, you lose everything you care about, especially since the Republican probably also take both houses of Congress by good margins. If you win, you win $2 (i.e., get stuck with Obama for another 4 years - not terrible, but not ideal either). |
|
|
| (920919) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 17 16:13:30 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by AlM on Sat Mar 17 16:11:42 2012. I structured my analogy on the assumption that the reader prefers Obama to all others running, considers Romney worse than Obama but a lesser evil than Santorum, and Santorum to be an utter disaster. |
|
|
| (920942) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 17:17:39 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sat Mar 17 08:44:18 2012. Did you see it? How was it? |
|
|
| (920989) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by Elkeeper on Sat Mar 17 21:41:35 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by AlM on Fri Mar 16 15:57:57 2012. Look at her daughter, Bristol. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree! |
|
|
| (921004) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 17 22:10:35 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 17:17:39 2012. I saw it. It was pretty good. Accurate, AFAIK. Parts of it actually made you sympathetic for her, missing her family while on the campaign trail and all. But she was clearly not vetted, and not ready for prime time. And in the end, a lethal combination of vain and stupid. |
|
|
| (921006) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 22:15:58 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 17 22:10:35 2012. Obviously I didn't bother, so can't express an opinion on what I never saw. I was just wondering since an opinion was offered, if it had actually been seen. :)And as to this go-round, she seemed pretty sane compared to the candidates on the deck of the S S Minnow this time around. Heh. |
|
|
| (921008) | |
Re: Cunny Woman 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by Rockparkman on Sat Mar 17 22:26:10 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 22:15:58 2012. TeeHeeHee. |
|
|
| (921021) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Mar 17 23:10:02 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 17:17:39 2012. Yes, HBO had it on. It was pretty bad in my opinion....like a Michael Moore movie. |
|
|
| (921023) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Mar 17 23:13:47 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 22:15:58 2012. I was just wondering since an opinion was offered, if it had actually been seen. :)??????????????????? Why would I comment on a movie I didn't see? |
|
|
| (921026) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 23:26:04 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Mar 17 23:10:02 2012. But did you see it? |
|
|
| (921027) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 23:26:51 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Mar 17 23:13:47 2012. Dunno ... that's why I asked if you did. I haven't ... but then I'm not opining on it either. I can see it if I really need to, but there's the trick right there. I don't. :) |
|
|
| (921029) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Mar 17 23:28:01 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 23:26:04 2012. Didn't I just say I did? Yes, HBO had it on. Did you have trouble reading that the first two times? |
|
|
| (921030) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 23:28:58 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Mar 17 23:28:01 2012. I read that one before the other. I work my way up normally from oldest I haven't seen to newest ... you can check the post numbers if it helps. |
|
|
| (921031) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Mar 17 23:30:37 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 23:26:51 2012. And I AM opining on it, and have seen it. Why do you keep asking me if I saw or insinuating I haven't, when I said several times I have? |
|
|
| (921034) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Mar 17 23:33:57 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 23:28:58 2012. No. This post set the tone pretty well, right where I said I saw it on HBO:http://www.subchat.com/otchat/read.asp?Id=921026 |
|
|
| (921035) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 17 23:36:35 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Mar 17 22:15:58 2012. I think you would enjoy it. Woody Harrelson, Julianne Moore and Ed Harris are terrific. |
|
|
| (921041) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Mar 18 00:14:01 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Mar 17 23:30:37 2012. I asked before you said you saw it. Go back and check. I was expecting that your opinion came without benefit of having seen it given your comments back there. As for Palin, despite the trumped up charges here, I could care less either way. :) |
|
|
| (921042) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Mar 18 00:15:19 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 17 23:36:35 2012. I'll see about catching it then ... Did Woody roll a bone for her to smoke? :) |
|
|
| (921057) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Mar 18 04:03:27 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Mar 17 23:10:02 2012. Are you even vaguely aware that the movie was done based on the book of Steven Schmidt, the McCain/Palin campaign manager and that he had a major role in the movie adoption? |
|
|
| (921069) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 18 07:24:31 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Mar 18 00:14:01 2012. I asked before you said you saw it. Go back and check.No. That is incorrect. Selkirk: Did you see it? How was it? GP38: Yes, HBO had it on. It was pretty bad in my opinion....like a Michael Moore movie. Selkirk: But did you see it? [I just said I did in the post being respond to] GP38: Didn't I just say I did? Yes, HBO had it on. Did you have trouble reading that the first two times? Selkirk: -I read that one before the other. I work my way up normally from oldest I haven't seen to newest [Yes, but the post you already responded to SAID I saw it on HBO, and I even answered your question on how was it.] -I was expecting that your opinion came without benefit of having seen it given your comments back there. [Yes you were so focused on an unwarranted idea you had in your head, you ignored comments directly to you, and you responded to, hoping your preconceived notion was correct, when there wasn't the slightest evidence that it was remotely the case]. |
|
|
| (921070) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 18 07:26:18 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SMAZ on Sun Mar 18 04:03:27 2012. Yes. I researched it after seeing the movie. Obviously someone with a grudge to pay. |
|
|
| (921072) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 18 07:30:06 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 17 23:36:35 2012. They were good. Julianne Moore looked more like Sarah Palin than Tina Fey did, and Ed Harris did look a lot like McCain.There are points where you actually think it's the real Sarah. The acting was great. But they were acting on the script as written, which was their job. Doesn't mean it's an accurate portrayal. |
|
|
| (921073) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 18 07:31:23 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 17 14:44:02 2012. Excellent post. |
|
|
| (921074) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Mar 18 07:33:38 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 18 07:26:18 2012. But you said it "was a partisan claptrap of a movie". |
|
|
| (921075) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 18 07:35:28 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by JayMan on Sat Mar 17 15:04:48 2012. This is a perfect example of fools putting politics and their personal dogma in front of their country. Once you put a person as the nominee, they have a chance of winning the presidency. Obama WILL have a fight on his hand, no matter who is the nominee, this is not 2008 when the odds were stacked for him, and all what would need to have on thing happen in the fall, bad for Obama (it could be anything from the way he handles a crisis to high gas prices, to any unforeseen thing, and you put the other guy in a position to win. You want to make sure that person is the real lesser of two evils (that being a matter of opinion of course), not the lesser of the lesser of two evils.Pig is totally correct on this. |
|
|
| (921077) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 18 07:38:55 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 17 16:13:30 2012. Exactly. You are absolutely correct on your analogy, as well as way of thinking.My first position for my country is to have a competent president. I never would want to put a person who is the worst of the choices of the opposing side in an actual position to win, and once there, He/She CAN win. |
|
|
| (921078) | |
Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 18 07:41:03 2012, in response to Re: Sarah Palin 'believed Queen was in charge of British forces in Iraq', posted by SMAZ on Sun Mar 18 07:33:38 2012. Yes, I did. |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|