|
|
| Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all (916025) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |
|
|
| (916025) | |
Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012 Rush was being far too kind to this willing tool of partisan distraction:http://www.jammiewf.com/2012/sandra-flukes-appearance-is-no-fluke/ She's also not exactly popular on the campus of Georgetown: http://thecollegeconservative.com/2012/03/02/sandra-fluke-does-not-speak-for-me/ Will all those who jumped to her defense admit they were played? Probably not. But any independent thinking person understands what she did. |
|
|
| (916035) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 12:09:47 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012. zzzzzzz |
|
|
| (916038) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 12:14:31 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012. Of course there was another side to the story but for the left, well lets not confuse smaz, italian squirrel and big-bung with all the facts. They'll go into overload. BTW - thanks for posting. |
|
|
| (916039) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:15:50 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 12:14:31 2012. They will remain committed to the lie that she was just some innocent college girl attacked by conservatives. |
|
|
| (916045) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 12:20:29 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:15:50 2012. Who said she was an innocent college girl? I knew all along she was an activist. That doesn't excuse Limbaugh's reprehensible attack on her as a slut.P.S. - Limbaugh himself called her a "coed." Doesn't he have researchers? The right has really stepped in it on this one. |
|
|
| (916046) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 12:20:48 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:15:50 2012. Absolutely |
|
|
| (916050) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:23:54 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012. So you're saying her story is floundering? |
|
|
| (916053) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:25:47 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:23:54 2012. I trout she was being honest. |
|
|
| (916056) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:29:32 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:25:47 2012. It does sound like a fish story. |
|
|
| (916058) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 12:30:19 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:29:32 2012. Stinks on ice. Must be more than a few days dead. |
|
|
| (916061) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:32:36 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 12:30:19 2012. Yes, it must be low tide. |
|
|
| (916062) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Mar 3 12:32:50 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012. Rush was being far too kind to this willing tool of partisan distraction:So mentioning her concerns, when they don't represent the concerns of ALL her fellow students, makes her a prostitute? |
|
|
| (916070) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:41:41 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:29:32 2012. I hope to cod this story just fades away. |
|
|
| (916072) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 12:46:02 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012. I don't care if she works for the DNC, Limbaugh was out of line.Of course, conservatives are "better people" who don't call names like that over disagreements in opinion :) your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (916081) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 13:04:29 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 12:46:02 2012. Funny how the "better", even "religious," people always seem to act worse. |
|
|
| (916082) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:05:26 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by AlM on Sat Mar 3 12:32:50 2012. She's prostituting herself doe a political cause. Call a spade a spade. |
|
|
| (916083) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:05:39 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by AlM on Sat Mar 3 12:32:50 2012. She's prostituting herself for a political cause. Call a spade a spade. |
|
|
| (916086) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:10:51 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 12:46:02 2012. Limbaugh is an entertainer. He does not speak for conservatives any more that bill maher speaks for liberals |
|
|
| (916089) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 13:26:22 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:10:51 2012. So? He's still out of line.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (916090) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:39:02 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 13:26:22 2012. Perhaps! Perhaps not! I hear what left wing douchebag entertainers like Jeannie Garafalo say about conservatives. That's entertainment |
|
|
| (916091) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:40:02 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:10:51 2012. 1) That doesn't excuse what he did.2) Since when? Too many republicans are constantly kissing his ass, not saying or doing anything that he could criticize them on. Makes one wonder exactly who's running the government. IIRC, nobody voted for that bloated tard. |
|
|
| (916092) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:42:31 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:40:02 2012. When you stop excusing what liberals say about conservatives in the name of entertainment, then I'll consider your arguments. BTW - If I were you, I'd lay off that "bloated tard" shit, if you know what I mean. |
|
|
| (916093) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:44:18 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:05:26 2012. Yet little miss RW isn't? Seems like Chris' little princess there is the one whoring her point on a blog, while someone with a POV of substance, and facts to back it up, is the one testifying to Congress. |
|
|
| (916094) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:45:04 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:05:39 2012. So is Chris' RW princess. |
|
|
| (916097) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:51:26 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:42:31 2012. You don't get it.....Limbaugh is NOT entertainment. Nor do i "know what you (SIC) mean". Neither do you. |
|
|
| (916099) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:53:18 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:41:41 2012. So why'd you start it? |
|
|
| (916100) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Mar 3 13:55:13 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 12:46:02 2012. he was out of line. so was Schultz calling Ingraham a "radio slut" and Maher who has said similar things about his female targets. people mess up all the time. |
|
|
| (916101) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 14:06:54 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:39:02 2012. Sounds like Limbaugh IS speaking for you guys then.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (916102) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:19:24 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:51:26 2012. Limbaugh is an entertainer! Like it or not he's paid very well to entertain a portion of the population that is interested in what he has to say. Based on the postings here, I'd say he has a fairly large liberal audience despite their protestations. And you probably do know exactly what I mean. |
|
|
| (916103) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:20:20 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:44:18 2012. I don't know "little miss RW" so I couldn't say. |
|
|
| (916106) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:23:45 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 14:06:54 2012. You'd likely have a better idea about that than I would since I virtually NEVER listen to Limbaugh or any of the other conservative-leaning entertainers. |
|
|
| (916107) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 14:23:57 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:20:20 2012. Nor do you know Sandra Fluke. I doubt anyone here does. |
|
|
| (916108) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 14:27:50 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:19:24 2012. He's not entertaining at all, he's just a bloated tard bloviator spewing his hateful opinion on the air. Never saw what the whole attraction was. He's not funny, he's insulting, mean spirited, uncreative and otherwise pretty dull. His facts are suspect, and that's been proven time and again.No,I do not have any idea of "what you (SIC) mean".Nor do you. |
|
|
| (916112) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:31:24 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 14:23:57 2012. Sandra Flake is speaking for an anonymous, likely non-existent 3rd person. I know you can add some made-up facts to bolster the bullshit but she's likely a work of fiction, much like many of your examples. |
|
|
| (916114) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:33:26 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 14:27:50 2012. You must have shit for brains! I didn't say he was entertaining. I said that he was paid to be an entertaining. You don't find him so. Many liberals apparently do. Now go take 2 doughnuts and call me tomorrow. |
|
|
| (916118) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 3 15:08:41 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 12:09:47 2012. +1 |
|
|
| (916128) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:42:17 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012. She's also not exactly popular on the campus of GeorgetownThat means she can't be having the amount of sex she claims to be having, since such unpopularity would extend off-campus too. Will all those who jumped to her defense admit they were played? They can't even admit the truth about the "Arab Spring" yet. It'll take a lot more than that . . . |
|
|
| (916130) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:47:01 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 12:46:02 2012. Aw, someone doesn't know what Rush really said. Doesn't take listening to him either . . .So where did Rush say "Sandra Fluke is a slut"? Go on; show us, Media Splatters maniac who fears that the Koch Brothers are hiding under his bed ready to drag him off in chains to work for them without pay indefinitely . . . |
|
|
| (916131) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:48:06 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Mar 3 13:55:13 2012. Go read the Rush transcripts. They're online. Stop following the herd . . . |
|
|
| (916132) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:48:55 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:31:24 2012. I know you can add some made-up facts to bolster the bullshitNobody can maintain a house of cards in that manner. |
|
|
| (916134) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 15:58:45 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 13:26:22 2012. Let's not fall for the "entertainer" line. Maher is professedly a comedian, like Jon Stewart. Limbaugh wishes to be considered a political pundit. He doesn't tell jokes. Even if he wanted to, he does have an evident sense of humor. |
|
|
| (916135) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 15:59:30 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:40:02 2012. Let's not fall for the "entertainer" line. Maher is professedly a comedian, like Jon Stewart. Limbaugh wishes to be considered a political pundit. He doesn't tell jokes. Even if he wanted to, he does have an evident sense of humor. |
|
|
| (916137) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:00:45 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 15:59:30 2012. Meant to say "he doesn't have." |
|
|
| (916138) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:00:51 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 15:59:30 2012. Meant to say "he doesn't have." |
|
|
| (916139) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:01:47 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 15:58:45 2012. Meant to say "he doesn't have." |
|
|
| (916140) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:03:19 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 14:27:50 2012. Of course Train Crude fails to understand that liberals don't listen to Rush. We hear about his rants from other media. |
|
|
| (916141) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:05:45 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:42:17 2012. Rush seems to think you need to take birth control pills each time you have sex, like Viagra. What a moron. |
|
|
| (916142) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:07:26 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:47:01 2012. Proves our point that Rush said it. Thanks for posting. |
|
|
| (916144) | |
Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Sat Mar 3 16:13:10 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:05:26 2012. So you're an Anti-Obama prostitute then? |
|
|
| (916145) | |
Chris uses LOL sources... Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Sat Mar 3 16:14:04 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012. College Conservative... and some blog.Really great job at investigative journalism there Chris! You're sure showing us up... Get out of the kitchen you're going to burn yourself... |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |
|