Home · Maps · About
Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3]

 

Page 1 of 3

Next Page >  

(916025)

view threaded

Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012

Rush was being far too kind to this willing tool of partisan distraction:

http://www.jammiewf.com/2012/sandra-flukes-appearance-is-no-fluke/

She's also not exactly popular on the campus of Georgetown:

http://thecollegeconservative.com/2012/03/02/sandra-fluke-does-not-speak-for-me/

Will all those who jumped to her defense admit they were played? Probably not. But any independent thinking person understands what she did.

(916035)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 12:09:47 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012.

zzzzzzz

(916038)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 12:14:31 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012.

Of course there was another side to the story but for the left, well lets not confuse smaz, italian squirrel and big-bung with all the facts. They'll go into overload. BTW - thanks for posting.

(916039)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:15:50 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 12:14:31 2012.

They will remain committed to the lie that she was just some innocent college girl attacked by conservatives.

(916045)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 12:20:29 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:15:50 2012.

Who said she was an innocent college girl? I knew all along she was an activist. That doesn't excuse Limbaugh's reprehensible attack on her as a slut.

P.S. - Limbaugh himself called her a "coed." Doesn't he have researchers?

The right has really stepped in it on this one.

(916046)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 12:20:48 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:15:50 2012.

Absolutely

(916050)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:23:54 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012.

So you're saying her story is floundering?

(916053)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:25:47 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:23:54 2012.

I trout she was being honest.

(916056)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:29:32 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:25:47 2012.

It does sound like a fish story.

(916058)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 12:30:19 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:29:32 2012.

Stinks on ice. Must be more than a few days dead.

(916061)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:32:36 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 12:30:19 2012.

Yes, it must be low tide.

(916062)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by AlM on Sat Mar 3 12:32:50 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012.

Rush was being far too kind to this willing tool of partisan distraction:

So mentioning her concerns, when they don't represent the concerns of ALL her fellow students, makes her a prostitute?
(916070)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:41:41 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by SLRT on Sat Mar 3 12:29:32 2012.

I hope to cod this story just fades away.

(916072)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 12:46:02 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012.

I don't care if she works for the DNC, Limbaugh was out of line.

Of course, conservatives are "better people" who don't call names like that over disagreements in opinion :)

your pal,
Fred

(916081)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 13:04:29 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 12:46:02 2012.

Funny how the "better", even "religious," people always seem to act worse.

(916082)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:05:26 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by AlM on Sat Mar 3 12:32:50 2012.

She's prostituting herself doe a political cause. Call a spade a spade.

(916083)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:05:39 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by AlM on Sat Mar 3 12:32:50 2012.

She's prostituting herself for a political cause. Call a spade a spade.

(916086)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:10:51 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 12:46:02 2012.

Limbaugh is an entertainer. He does not speak for conservatives any more that bill maher speaks for liberals

(916089)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 13:26:22 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:10:51 2012.

So? He's still out of line.

your pal,
Fred

(916090)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:39:02 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 13:26:22 2012.

Perhaps! Perhaps not! I hear what left wing douchebag entertainers like Jeannie Garafalo say about conservatives. That's entertainment

(916091)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:40:02 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:10:51 2012.

1) That doesn't excuse what he did.

2) Since when? Too many republicans are constantly kissing his ass, not saying or doing anything that he could criticize them on. Makes one wonder exactly who's running the government. IIRC, nobody voted for that bloated tard.

(916092)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:42:31 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:40:02 2012.

When you stop excusing what liberals say about conservatives in the name of entertainment, then I'll consider your arguments. BTW - If I were you, I'd lay off that "bloated tard" shit, if you know what I mean.

(916093)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:44:18 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:05:26 2012.

Yet little miss RW isn't? Seems like Chris' little princess there is the one whoring her point on a blog, while someone with a POV of substance, and facts to back it up, is the one testifying to Congress.

(916094)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:45:04 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:05:39 2012.

So is Chris' RW princess.

(916097)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:51:26 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:42:31 2012.

You don't get it.....Limbaugh is NOT entertainment. Nor do i "know what you (SIC) mean". Neither do you.

(916099)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:53:18 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 12:41:41 2012.

So why'd you start it?

(916100)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Mar 3 13:55:13 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 12:46:02 2012.

he was out of line. so was Schultz calling Ingraham a "radio slut" and Maher who has said similar things about his female targets. people mess up all the time.

(916101)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 14:06:54 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:39:02 2012.

Sounds like Limbaugh IS speaking for you guys then.

your pal,
Fred

(916102)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:19:24 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:51:26 2012.

Limbaugh is an entertainer! Like it or not he's paid very well to entertain a portion of the population that is interested in what he has to say. Based on the postings here, I'd say he has a fairly large liberal audience despite their protestations. And you probably do know exactly what I mean.

(916103)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:20:20 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:44:18 2012.

I don't know "little miss RW" so I couldn't say.

(916106)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:23:45 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 14:06:54 2012.

You'd likely have a better idea about that than I would since I virtually NEVER listen to Limbaugh or any of the other conservative-leaning entertainers.

(916107)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 14:23:57 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:20:20 2012.

Nor do you know Sandra Fluke. I doubt anyone here does.

(916108)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 14:27:50 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:19:24 2012.

He's not entertaining at all, he's just a bloated tard bloviator spewing his hateful opinion on the air. Never saw what the whole attraction was. He's not funny, he's insulting, mean spirited, uncreative and otherwise pretty dull. His facts are suspect, and that's been proven time and again.

No,I do not have any idea of "what you (SIC) mean".Nor do you.

(916112)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:31:24 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 14:23:57 2012.

Sandra Flake is speaking for an anonymous, likely non-existent 3rd person. I know you can add some made-up facts to bolster the bullshit but she's likely a work of fiction, much like many of your examples.

(916114)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:33:26 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 14:27:50 2012.

You must have shit for brains! I didn't say he was entertaining. I said that he was paid to be an entertaining. You don't find him so. Many liberals apparently do. Now go take 2 doughnuts and call me tomorrow.

(916118)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 3 15:08:41 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 12:09:47 2012.

+1

(916128)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:42:17 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012.

She's also not exactly popular on the campus of Georgetown

That means she can't be having the amount of sex she claims to be having, since such unpopularity would extend off-campus too.

Will all those who jumped to her defense admit they were played?

They can't even admit the truth about the "Arab Spring" yet. It'll take a lot more than that . . .

(916130)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:47:01 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 12:46:02 2012.

Aw, someone doesn't know what Rush really said. Doesn't take listening to him either . . .
Oh, yeah, I'm gonna deal with this. I'm gonna deal with it. I think this is hilarious. Absolutely hilarious. The left has been thrown into an outright conniption fit! This is "phony soldiers" times ten. Oh, ten times worse than phony soldiers. The reaction that they are having to what I said yesterday about Susan Fluke — or Sandra Fluke, whatever her name is — the Georgetown student who went before a congressional committee and said she's having so much sex, she's going broke buying contraceptives and wants us to buy them. I said, "Well, what would you call someone who wants us to pay for her to have sex? What would you call that woman? You'd call 'em a slut, a prostitute or whatever."

That has sent them into orbit! Pelosi's in orbit and Sheila Jackson Lee. They're still talking about it on the House floor. The Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee sent out an immediate fundraising letter with a picture making me look like Dracula. I mean it is... (laughing) I've got the original story here that all this feeds off of, so all of you sit tight. Look, at least I didn't call her "a woman driver," and I'll tell you this, you people on the left: I'll happily buy her all the aspirin she wants. Snerdley, you would agree. We would happily buy Sandra Fluke all the aspirin she wants. What could that possibly cost. But contraceptives? So much sex at Georgetown?
So where did Rush say "Sandra Fluke is a slut"? Go on; show us, Media Splatters maniac who fears that the Koch Brothers are hiding under his bed ready to drag him off in chains to work for them without pay indefinitely . . .

(916131)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:48:06 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Mar 3 13:55:13 2012.

Go read the Rush transcripts. They're online. Stop following the herd . . .

(916132)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:48:55 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 14:31:24 2012.

I know you can add some made-up facts to bolster the bullshit

Nobody can maintain a house of cards in that manner.

(916134)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 15:58:45 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 3 13:26:22 2012.

Let's not fall for the "entertainer" line. Maher is professedly a comedian, like Jon Stewart. Limbaugh wishes to be considered a political pundit. He doesn't tell jokes. Even if he wanted to, he does have an evident sense of humor.

(916135)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 15:59:30 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 13:40:02 2012.

Let's not fall for the "entertainer" line. Maher is professedly a comedian, like Jon Stewart. Limbaugh wishes to be considered a political pundit. He doesn't tell jokes. Even if he wanted to, he does have an evident sense of humor.

(916137)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:00:45 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 15:59:30 2012.

Meant to say "he doesn't have."

(916138)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:00:51 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 15:59:30 2012.

Meant to say "he doesn't have."

(916139)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:01:47 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 15:58:45 2012.

Meant to say "he doesn't have."

(916140)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut

Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:03:19 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Still Doesn't Deserve To Be Called A Slut, posted by bingbong on Sat Mar 3 14:27:50 2012.

Of course Train Crude fails to understand that liberals don't listen to Rush. We hear about his rants from other media.

(916141)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:05:45 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:42:17 2012.

Rush seems to think you need to take birth control pills each time you have sex, like Viagra. What a moron.

(916142)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by italianstallion on Sat Mar 3 16:07:26 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 3 15:47:01 2012.

Proves our point that Rush said it. Thanks for posting.

(916144)

view threaded

Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by ClearAspect on Sat Mar 3 16:13:10 2012, in response to Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Train Dude on Sat Mar 3 13:05:26 2012.

So you're an Anti-Obama prostitute then?

(916145)

view threaded

Chris uses LOL sources... Re: Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all

Posted by ClearAspect on Sat Mar 3 16:14:04 2012, in response to Sandra Fluke: Not so innocent after all, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Mar 3 11:55:21 2012.

College Conservative... and some blog.

Really great job at investigative journalism there Chris! You're sure showing us up...

Get out of the kitchen you're going to burn yourself...

[1 2 3]

 

Page 1 of 3

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]