|
|
| PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals (913114) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (913114) | |
PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 13:27:24 2012 http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/24/documents-peta-kills-more-than-95-percent-of-pets-in-its-care/Normally I make fun of PETA, since their entire organization is a punchline, but this is not funny. |
|
|
| (913148) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 14:18:48 2012, in response to PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 13:27:24 2012. Hmm . . . dead silence from those that ought to be stepping up to defend the president for killing that fly. Remember PETA's fake outrage at that? Never mind the recent resumption of horse slaughter, another thing that PETA feigns outrage at . . . |
|
|
| (913163) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 26 14:51:13 2012, in response to PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 13:27:24 2012. Relax. Its the DC, there are no links to the actual documents and the link they do provide is 404.LOL your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (913164) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 14:56:04 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 26 14:51:13 2012. Relax. Its the DC. . . says he who linketh to Media Splatters. and the link they do provide is 404 No, it's merely broken; the 404 was on the DC website. Take a look . . . |
|
|
| (913165) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 26 15:04:22 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 14:56:04 2012. zzzzzzz....may as well be from the weekly world news.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (913167) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 15:12:26 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 26 15:04:22 2012. The documents are from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. You trying to say that they forged them?
|
|
|
| (913171) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 26 15:17:54 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 15:12:26 2012. I'd 'like to see the actual documents.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (913181) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sun Feb 26 15:48:34 2012, in response to PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 13:27:24 2012. |
|
|
| (913188) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 15:57:29 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 26 15:04:22 2012.  Are you that partisan that you can't credit DC for breaking what's basically a story that should infuriate everyone? |
|
|
| (913192) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 16:19:29 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 15:57:29 2012. Are you that partisan that you can't credit DC for breaking what's basically a story that should infuriate everyone?He links to Media Splatters. What does that tell you? |
|
|
| (913193) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 16:20:41 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 16:19:29 2012. he should link to Brussels Journal, Stratfor or german-foreign-policy.com instead. |
|
|
| (913204) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 26 16:59:46 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 15:57:29 2012. If it's true it's terrible. I just don't want to get all up in a lather over something DC prints.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (913218) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 26 17:23:21 2012, in response to PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 13:27:24 2012. I don't know the specifics here, and I usually think PETA goes too far, but I do know that most animal shelters euthanize most of the animals they take. There are simply not enough adoptive families for all the strays and abandoned animals that find their way to shelters. |
|
|
| (913226) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Feb 26 17:33:00 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 26 15:04:22 2012. I think we should put James O'Keefe in a box and take him on down there. He can cover what happens for DC ... :) |
|
|
| (913484) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Feb 27 09:00:22 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 26 17:23:21 2012. I don't know the specifics here, and I usually think PETA goes too far, but I do know that most animal shelters euthanize most of the animals they take. There are simply not enough adoptive families for all the strays and abandoned animals that find their way to shelters.PETA's Norfolk headquarters isn't an adoption shelter. They send adoptable animals to the SPCA shelter (and are not counted as "adopted"). The rest are unadoptable animals that have usually been rejected by other shelters. |
|
|
| (913490) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Feb 27 09:16:30 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 26 17:23:21 2012. There are plenty of no-kill shelters. Of coruse, no-kill shelters can't accept all the animals they are offered.The NYC Center for Animal Care and Control (CACC) has to accept all animals. A quick google suggests they euthanized 68% in one particular year. There are many complaints (which may or may not be valid) that they don't work hard enough to get animals adopted. |
|
|
| (913493) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Feb 27 09:31:35 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 26 16:59:46 2012. Another point is that animals do get put to sleep if they're unfit.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (913494) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Feb 27 09:36:07 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 15:57:29 2012. How do you know RIPTA's explanation is false? If PETA gives all the animals it can to shelters and only euthanizes the ones other shelters won't accept, than of course it will have a huge percentage of animals euthanized. |
|
|
| (913543) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Mon Feb 27 12:51:15 2012, in response to PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 13:27:24 2012. This is actually pretty old news, since, as the article mentioned, this has been going on for years. PETA didn't apologize for any of it, just gave some weaselly responses, even from the founder. Perfect example of a hypocrite organization. |
|
|
| (913544) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Feb 27 12:56:43 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by 3-9 on Mon Feb 27 12:51:15 2012. Still, no one is refuting RIPTA's explanation. |
|
|
| (913546) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Mon Feb 27 13:09:47 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by AlM on Mon Feb 27 12:56:43 2012. Well, if RIPTA's explanation is true, then yeah, the original documents would be a lot more important. |
|
|
| (913589) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Feb 27 15:09:22 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by 3-9 on Mon Feb 27 13:09:47 2012. That's why we should see them and not just the TV Guide that was linked here.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (913633) | |
Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Mon Feb 27 16:13:28 2012, in response to Re: PETA: People for the Egregious Termination of Animals, posted by Fred G on Mon Feb 27 15:09:22 2012. But TV Guide/Monarch Notes/etc. is sooo much easier to read. 8-) |
|
|