|
|
| Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch (910658) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||
|
| (910898) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 13:14:09 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 12:56:09 2012. ....psst!.....let's not tell they they ARE the government! k? |
|
|
| (910904) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 19 14:47:03 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 11:55:34 2012. Yes, Chris - do us all a favor. After all we could all learn what's good for our children from a red neck who's never had any. |
|
|
| (910909) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Sun Feb 19 15:02:13 2012, in response to Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated "unhealthy" lunch, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Feb 18 19:17:18 2012. Can she PROVE the charge? I don't care about the seriousness, but the substance of the charge.I'd like to believe her, but people often lie out of spite. |
|
|
| (910911) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 15:04:57 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 19 14:47:03 2012. There's nothing in this thread that has anything to do with child rearing techniques so it's moot whether one is a parent or not.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910913) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 15:07:51 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 19 14:47:03 2012. Irrelevant facts (apparently your forte) aside, what is your problem? I am encouraging someone to do something about what they see as a problem. I'm not running for a school board, Chris is a parent and ought to if he's that concerned about something like that happening to his kid. He is mistaken in saying it's "government" doing that, when it's local school board decisions....meal policies and who they hire to enact the policies are LOCAL decisions.If he does the right thing, to show he's interested in doing something about it he'll find out firsthand.I can't help it if you have a reality gap, might want to get some help seeing how you have so much time on your hands now that you're retired on a public employee pension and no longer contributing to society. Go ride your bike. |
|
|
| (910914) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 19 15:16:14 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 15:04:57 2012. It's the very nonchalant attitude that's being exhibited by certain posters concerning how much input a parent should have in areas outside of education. If this is actually going on, parents should not have to run for the school board to insure that their children are eating what the parents deem healthy (so long as the child's health is not being endangered). To tell people that if they want their children to have a turkey sandwich and a banana for lunch instead of processed chicken nuggets, they should run for office - is going way out of bounds. One must wonder if such people ever had their own children, would they cede so much control over their children to bureaucrats. If so, then perhaps it's a good thing that they never had children. |
|
|
| (910915) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 19 15:19:42 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 15:07:51 2012.  My daughter should not have to run for office for a job that she doesn't want just to insure that her child gets a fresh, nutritious meal that she prepares herself instead of a mass produced meal that's considered fast food or junk food. Sounds like you've scarfed down more than your share of not-so-healthy food in your day. Hence your not so healthy attitudes. |
|
|
| (910916) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 15:24:16 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 19 15:16:14 2012. Wrong. They send their child to a school whose rules are set by their local school board. If they do not either interact with (PTAs are often a conduit for parental input to a school board) or become a member of such board to provide their input, they have to live with whatever rules there are. Seems a lot of people here are whining about something happening at the local level 500ish miles away from the NYC metro area. Read the article. It's entirely a local issue in NC. Not N*Y*C. The way to prevent this from happening here is to get involved in setting meal rules so it does not occur locally. Whining about this does not solve anything, the whiners have NO say in a local affair 500 miles from their home, and don't seem to care enough to do anything locally to ensure similar incidences effect their families. THAT IS THE ISSUE. It is NOT th e"government"doing this. It is a local issue.If you blow a dog whistle, expect a dog. Caring for that dog is now the whistle blower's problem. Walk the walk or STFU. |
|
|
| (910917) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 15:29:44 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 12:55:32 2012. One does tend to die. |
|
|
| (910918) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 19 15:30:30 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 15:24:16 2012. WRONG - porky. It's you that should STFU about issues you don't understand. If you want to have your child filled with processed chicken and other junk food then go have a child and do it. I realize that people like you need government supervision in order to breath at the proper rate but free people have the right to make such decisions for themselves. |
|
|
| (910919) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 15:36:56 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 15:29:44 2012. Right and while alive is still a parent. So, a child has 2 parents until one of them dies.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910921) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 15:51:13 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 15:36:56 2012. I never said otherwise. Tell that to bingbong. And why the silly word games? It's obvious what Luch meant and that he was correct in the way that he used parent. |
|
|
| (910922) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 19 15:52:09 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 01:52:08 2012. Do you have any understanding of the meaning of "university?" |
|
|
| (910924) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Feb 19 15:54:08 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 19 15:52:09 2012. +1 |
|
|
| (910925) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 15:57:23 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 15:51:13 2012. It was a post-script comment to my post and if it was so silly why did you respond to it?your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910930) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:05:31 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 15:57:23 2012. I respond to lots of silly comments that people make, but I don't defend them. |
|
|
| (910932) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 19 16:07:47 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 15:24:16 2012. Previous poster said, "If this is actually going on. . ."This is what I hate about conservatives. Here we have ONE school board, one out of thousands in the USA, that does something stupid. Conservatives plaster it all over the right-wing media, act as if this is a widespread indication of the excesses of (federal?) government overreach, and proclaim the end of the world as we know it What makes it worse is then the (supposedly liberal) mainstream media picks it up and runs with it and it becomes a firestorm. Memo to conservatives and their enablers - no, this is not "actually going on." |
|
|
| (910935) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:11:58 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 19 16:07:47 2012. Yeah because liberals never do the same thing against singular conservative incidents, right? |
|
|
| (910937) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 16:12:41 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:05:31 2012. And here you are arguing...your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910942) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 16:18:24 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 19 16:07:47 2012. Just like that widespread outrage over Tim Tebow :Pyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910944) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 16:19:51 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 16:18:24 2012. Why do you keep saying "outrage"? "Reaction" would better describe it. |
|
|
| (910949) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:23:28 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 16:12:41 2012. There's nothing to argue. |
|
|
| (910950) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 16:23:46 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 16:19:51 2012. Because the claim was that the left was outraged.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910951) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 16:26:28 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:23:28 2012. Of course not. Thank you.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910954) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 16:29:30 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 16:23:46 2012. Both sides were outraged as things escalated from week-to-week.People like SMAZ and many like him were emotionally invested in seeing Tebow lose. Ratings were high when he played, and it wasn't because of his QB skills. |
|
|
| (910955) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 16:31:57 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 16:29:30 2012. The claim was that he outraged those on the left, a claim that was debunked. You must not have been here.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910956) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 19 16:32:04 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:11:58 2012. Not nearly as much and as consistently. |
|
|
| (910957) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:32:08 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 16:29:30 2012. His ratings were high mostly because people that liked him tuned in, not because people that didn't like him tuned in. He was the most popular athlete in the country according to ESPN. |
|
|
| (910959) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:33:19 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 19 16:32:04 2012. Maybe. Or maybe we only notice when it's about our side. |
|
|
| (910962) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:36:42 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 19 16:32:04 2012. You just did it in the Santorum thread! One person says something and you make it the right. |
|
|
| (910964) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 19 16:40:15 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:36:42 2012. No. I can cite many instances of such historical ignorance, from such luminaries as Gingrich, Bachmann and Palin, among others. I chose my characterization quite deliberately.Additionally, my remarks were not broadcast nationally :-) |
|
|
| (910965) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 16:47:35 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:32:08 2012. I think you're right about the football game ratings. But they were high because of the hype machine in place all week. |
|
|
| (910968) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:52:21 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 16:47:35 2012. Not the usual sports hype though. People - especially fundamentalist Christians - were finding out about Tebow from other places. He was on entertainment shows, on the news, probably on religious shows. |
|
|
| (910972) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 16:59:54 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 16:52:21 2012. I think the "fundamentalist Christians" were well aware of him. To me, this season was a continuation of the controversy that started over Tebow's Super Bowl ad. Once he was playing and lost his first game, it gave opponents of Christianity a platform to stand on. Then he unexpectedly went on a winning streak and things escalated from there. |
|
|
| (911003) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 19 17:55:21 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by AlM on Sun Feb 19 07:21:45 2012. I agree, in a vacuum, it's not much of an offense. However, it's disturbing to see increasing encroachment upon parents' rights. Parents have the legal right to send their kids to school with Twinkies and Cheeze Wiz for lunch and there's absolutely no way a school official should ever be empowered to interfere. Of course, we'd all hope no parent would do such a thing. |
|
|
| (911008) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Sun Feb 19 18:09:29 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 19 17:55:21 2012. But how do I know that either of these parents are not lying? I see them as liars without evidence. |
|
|
| (911012) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 18:51:41 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 19 17:55:21 2012. However, it's disturbing to see increasing encroachment upon parents' rightsIt's all in the Communist Manifesto, second chapter. |
|
|
| (911013) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 18:52:17 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by AMoreira81 on Sun Feb 19 18:09:29 2012. Thanks for admitting that you believe in Code Napoleon (guilty until proven innocent). |
|
|
| (911014) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by RockParkMan on Sun Feb 19 18:52:50 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 18:51:41 2012. Fuck you, subhuman idiot. you should be a medical experiment.The altrernative to a strong German based EU is a strong Russia. Now stop vandalizing threads and scrub my toilet, you shanty trash piece of shit. Then learn to love the EU which is the strongest defender of Western Civilization besides America and Israel |
|
|
| (911015) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by RockParkMan on Sun Feb 19 18:53:03 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 18:52:17 2012. Fuck you, subhuman idiot. you should be a medical experiment.The altrernative to a strong German based EU is a strong Russia. Now stop vandalizing threads and scrub my toilet, you shanty trash piece of shit. Then learn to love the EU which is the strongest defender of Western Civilization besides America and Israel |
|
|
| (911017) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Feb 19 18:53:24 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 18:51:41 2012. Second verse, worse than the first. |
|
|
| (911020) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Sun Feb 19 19:02:04 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 18:52:17 2012. Uh, I go by the substance of the accusation, not its seriousness. Substance over style! |
|
|
| (911033) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 19 19:21:31 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 19 17:55:21 2012. It was spelled out in "Brave New World". Huxley foresaw the coming of extremist liberalism. |
|
|
| (911037) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Feb 19 19:25:20 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 19 17:55:21 2012. Sorry ... I can almost accept the twinkies. Enough preservative to ensure that the kid won't decompose for at least 50 years. But the cheese-whiz? Nope ... that's child abuse. :) |
|
|
| (911045) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 19:33:51 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 11:46:24 2012. Or it can be done by locally elected mayors, congress people etc....usually of the democratic persuasion. |
|
|
| (911047) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 19:37:04 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 12:07:36 2012. You only need two for the act of procreating...after that many dont have two. You probably dont understand that as you appear, at least how you post anyway, to be one of the coldest people. |
|
|
| (911051) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 19:41:27 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 10:03:08 2012. And people.wonder about his motive after being a lifelong democrat. |
|
|
| (911053) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 19:42:05 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 19 17:55:21 2012. Cheez whiz to dunk the twinkies in? Man that's hard core. Ok maybe if it was jalapeño CW.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (911056) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 19:43:07 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 19:37:04 2012. You are too serious for your own good. |
|
|
| (911059) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 19:46:46 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 16:31:57 2012. It wasnt debunked at all. The people starting threads on him were extreme leftists comparing him to hamas and such. |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||