|
|
| Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated "unhealthy" lunch (910658) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |
|
|
| (910658) | |
Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated "unhealthy" lunch |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Feb 18 19:17:18 2012 This time, we have a name and a far more specific charge:http://www.theblaze.com/stories/exclusive-2nd-n-c-mother-says-daughters-school-lunch-replaced-for-not-being-healthy-enough/ I think the first mother was probably telling the truth. |
|
|
| (910706) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Feb 18 21:04:56 2012, in response to Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated "unhealthy" lunch, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Feb 18 19:17:18 2012. Yawn. It's stupid but legal. School officials do stupid things all the time. |
|
|
| (910719) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Feb 18 21:27:02 2012, in response to Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated "unhealthy" lunch, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Feb 18 19:17:18 2012. I guess this will convince Jeff Rosen.Pretty sad. It's illegal for parents to send their kids to school with a sandwich. This is why government wants the percentage of single-parent households to continue growing. It allows government to have more control. |
|
|
| (910733) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Feb 18 21:39:02 2012, in response to Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated "unhealthy" lunch, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Feb 18 19:17:18 2012. Funny how they denied doing this... |
|
|
| (910774) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Feb 18 22:49:53 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Feb 18 21:27:02 2012. Do conservatives like schools to have rules, or not? I used to think they did. |
|
|
| (910775) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Feb 18 22:53:08 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by italianstallion on Sat Feb 18 22:49:53 2012. I think that they like local jurisdiction instead of federal. |
|
|
| (910776) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Feb 18 22:56:31 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Easy on Sat Feb 18 22:53:08 2012. Federal rules do not require confiscation of lunches. |
|
|
| (910777) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Feb 18 23:00:09 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by italianstallion on Sat Feb 18 22:56:31 2012. Whether they do or not, I think that they like local control. As long as the federal government is involved some people will be suspicious. |
|
|
| (910779) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Feb 18 23:18:00 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by italianstallion on Sat Feb 18 22:49:53 2012. No chewing gun or tank tops makes sense. This doesn't. |
|
|
| (910806) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 01:52:08 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Feb 18 23:18:00 2012. What do you want from a product of Columbia U, Ahmadinejad's favorite university . . . ? |
|
|
| (910808) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Feb 19 02:06:40 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 01:52:08 2012. LOL! |
|
|
| (910809) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 02:09:35 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Feb 19 02:06:40 2012. Yes, LOLage aplenty. |
|
|
| (910812) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Feb 19 02:20:31 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 02:09:35 2012. Yeah, God forbid we have a chance to hear the moron in person instead of YOUR translation of the book of whack. |
|
|
| (910836) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 07:05:51 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Edwards! on Sat Feb 18 21:39:02 2012. Yes it is quite funny...but typical of government. |
|
|
| (910837) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 07:08:55 2012, in response to Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated "unhealthy" lunch, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Feb 18 19:17:18 2012. Wow. It's amazing that people don't see that there is seriously something wrong here. It's way overstepping by the government. |
|
|
| (910838) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Feb 19 07:21:45 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 07:08:55 2012. School officials do stupid things all the time. Compared to incidents like strip searches and major punishment for giving a fellow student an ibuprofen, this is nothing. |
|
|
| (910840) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 07:38:29 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by AlM on Sun Feb 19 07:21:45 2012. ???? How does saying something like that make it any better?The fact that the school even thinks that it should be able to second guess what a parent sends with their child as lunch is an abomination. The other two mentioned things, especially the Advil is bad, but the lunch thing is ridiculous. |
|
|
| (910842) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Feb 19 07:48:20 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Feb 18 21:27:02 2012. "I guess this will convince Jeff Rosen."Convince me of what? Why do you even mention other poster's names in your posts? (OK, I admit I mention Terrapin, Ron in Bullshit, and Salaam, but they're exceptions._ "Pretty sad. It's illegal for parents to send their kids to school with a sandwich." |
|
|
| (910846) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 08:15:11 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Feb 19 07:48:20 2012. Convince you that the school wants final say over what students eat and will confiscate lunches provided by parents. |
|
|
| (910847) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 08:19:42 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by AlM on Sun Feb 19 07:21:45 2012. It's about how much power the state should have over a parent-child relationship. There is good reason for the school to want to provide a health lunch to students. But parents should have final say.And how are chicken nuggets "healthy"? Because it's a "serving of meat/poultry"? Those things are loaded with calories. |
|
|
| (910849) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 08:27:23 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 01:52:08 2012. LOL!Go pray in traffic! your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910850) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 08:39:08 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by AlM on Sun Feb 19 07:21:45 2012. True, and this is basically someone who grabbed more authority than they actually had, and not some widespread government plot. Then again, it's OTChat where 2 means "widespread" :Pyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910853) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:00:47 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 08:39:08 2012. Add the hundreds more schools where they won't let a parent send their child to school with lunch at all. |
|
|
| (910854) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:01:51 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 08:19:42 2012. Yeah, I was wondering that too, especially the way they are prepared to get the crust on them, are probably prepackaged, deep fried, drenched in salt to preserve. |
|
|
| (910856) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 09:07:07 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:00:47 2012. That's not the same as inspecting lunches.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910858) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 09:09:10 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 08:19:42 2012. You'll claim that they're "not so bad" when Mayor Mike bans them :)your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910859) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 09:13:48 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:01:51 2012. I'd love to see the menu for an entire month. Just curious. Even if the food is good(I doubt that it is), parents should still be allowed to provide a lunch for their children. |
|
|
| (910862) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:18:31 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 09:07:07 2012. Sure it is. Either way they aren't letting the parent decide what their kid has for lunch. |
|
|
| (910863) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:19:29 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 09:09:10 2012. Whether they are not so bad or not is besides the point. "Mayor Mike" shouldn't be banning what he bans to begin with. If I want to eat them, that's my choice, not his. |
|
|
| (910864) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:21:21 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 09:13:48 2012. Of course they should. The school lunches should be there just as they always have been, if the parent doesn't send their kid to school with lunch, so they have lunch, or if the parent doesn't want their kid eating what the school provides. That is the PARENT decision. Of course for the kids that threw their mother's lunch in the trash and bought whatever the school is selling. Either way it's not the public institution's decision to overstep a parent. |
|
|
| (910866) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 09:36:20 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:18:31 2012. In a blanket statement kind of way it is. Specifically no, because if the school bans home lunches, parents know upfront what's going on. And it's not really lunch "inspection" but more some school employee noticing someone's lunch and commenting on it, which is bullshit.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910867) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 09:37:33 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:19:29 2012. It's not beside the point I made, which is that the perspective will change depending on the source politics.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910868) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 09:41:55 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 09:37:33 2012. Your Amy Winehouse point was a good one. This one is weak. "Righties" are outraged over proposed salt bans in NYC, and complain about the food police whenever the topic comes up.Besides, no one on "the right" sees Bloomberg as a conservative. |
|
|
| (910869) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 09:46:42 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 09:41:55 2012. We'll see if and when an actual ban of such comes up :)your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910870) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 09:52:38 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 09:46:42 2012. Every proposed or actual ban in NYC or beyond, has been opposed by the "righties".Didn't your mother send you to school with a sandwich? You're old enough to be from the generation when most kids had two parents. |
|
|
| (910871) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 09:58:41 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 09:46:42 2012. Everyone here complains about bloombergs crap. And besides...hes a lifekong democrat...that changed to republican to get elected...and after switched back out.There no one here that defends the trans fat...salt and all his other crap...in fact most complain |
|
|
| (910873) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 10:02:14 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 09:52:38 2012. Of course, we didn't have school lunch in Catholic school. We traded lunches too; usually a Fluffernutter was most popular. Nobody wanted my liverwurst sandwiches.your pal, Fred PS all children have 2 parents :D |
|
|
| (910874) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 10:03:08 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 09:58:41 2012. Recently, Bloomberg has defended the Ground Zero Victory Mosque and two weeks ago gave $250,000 to Planned Parenthood after the Komen controversy. |
|
|
| (910876) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 10:04:04 2012, in response to Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated "unhealthy" lunch, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Feb 18 19:17:18 2012. Let's see what we have here.....2 schools in one state. Sounds like a local problem, not anything of any concern outside of where this is happening. |
|
|
| (910878) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 10:08:48 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 10:03:08 2012. Good for him.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910885) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 11:46:24 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:00:47 2012. That's locally set policies which the parents can change by running for school board and then changing the policy. It isn't difficult, and would set a good example for the kids about enacting change in a positive manner. Fact is, it doesn't mean enough to the parents to do it. It takes time and effort on their part, they'd rather just whine about it. |
|
|
| (910886) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Feb 19 11:49:48 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 07:08:55 2012. It's not the government! It's the school. |
|
|
| (910887) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 11:50:33 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Easy on Sat Feb 18 23:00:09 2012. And here we see them whining about a local control issue that they could readily change by running for their local school board and changing the policy. But that takes effort and dedication, which is clearly lacking or we wouldn't be discussing this. It's easier to troll forums and whine I guess. |
|
|
| (910888) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Feb 19 11:51:56 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 07:38:29 2012. LOL! |
|
|
| (910890) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 11:55:34 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 07:08:55 2012. Fer chrissakes, it's a local school board's policy. Government has much bigger things to handle than PB&J. Go run for school board and set the lunch policy. The Dept of Agriculture, which funds the school lunch program has NO policy on brown bag lunches. There is no other authority to answer to WRT this.Do everyone a favor, get off the internet, run for school board and change the lunch policy. Trolling the forum here about it isn't going to change a thing. |
|
|
| (910891) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Feb 19 11:55:52 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 09:52:38 2012. Didn't your mother send you to school with a sandwich?No. Except that brief period where I wanted to bring lunch from home. That lasted only a few days. |
|
|
| (910894) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 12:07:36 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 09:52:38 2012. All kids have 2 parents. Otherwise they simply wouldn't be. |
|
|
| (910895) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 12:21:22 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 12:07:36 2012. Only at conception, not necessarily still true by the time that they attend school. |
|
|
| (910896) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 12:55:32 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Easy on Sun Feb 19 12:21:22 2012. Unless one dies, a child still has... :)your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (910897) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 12:56:09 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 11:50:33 2012. They'd rather have the government change it :Pyour pal, Fred |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |
|