|
|
| Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch (910658) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||
|
| (911064) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 19:59:13 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 19:41:27 2012. Supporting free religion and woman's access to quality health care? Yep must be a Democrat.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (911066) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 20:02:19 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 19:46:46 2012. It wasn't widespread as you claimed. It was one poster, SMAZ that compared him to Hamas. That's not widespread outrage, for the umpteenth time.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (911067) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Feb 19 20:02:32 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 19:59:13 2012. Sure ain't Santorum ... |
|
|
| (911070) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 20:06:19 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 19:42:05 2012. Now hour talkin.... |
|
|
| (911071) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 20:12:30 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 20:02:19 2012. SMAZ also said Tebow's church wants to kill Train Dude. |
|
|
| (911072) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 20:12:42 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 20:06:19 2012. I knew I'd get an amen from you :)your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (911073) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 20:19:22 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 20:12:42 2012. Well that was supposed to be your not hour...damn cell phone...but i am sure you got the idea. |
|
|
| (911075) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 20:21:28 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 20:12:30 2012. SMAZ said a lot of things in that thread. I never heard those statements made anywhere else so it's not like there's some movement or conspiracy among those left of center.I think most of the so-called anti Tebow comments were basically people laughing at him. your pal Fred |
|
|
| (911076) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 20:22:14 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 20:12:30 2012. And even worse. Never a comment to attack the absurdity...just those that attacked the absurdity get reprimanded. |
|
|
| (911084) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 19 21:06:30 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 19 20:02:19 2012. No it wasn't wide spread but it was clearly divided along conservative, liberal lines |
|
|
| (911142) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Feb 20 03:11:02 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 19 15:24:16 2012. Great post! |
|
|
| (911143) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 20 03:16:18 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by SMAZ on Mon Feb 20 03:11:02 2012. Ya gotta love how conservatards bitch about what they get when they're unwilling to show up and do some actual work. Just like hippies ... they protest and do nothing. |
|
|
| (911144) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Feb 20 03:19:50 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 19 20:22:14 2012. Rabbi Hammerman vindicated my comments. |
|
|
| (911170) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 06:35:21 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by SMAZ on Mon Feb 20 03:19:50 2012. Who the hell is "Rabbi Hammerman" and why should anyone care what he says? |
|
|
| (911171) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 06:38:45 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 20 03:16:18 2012. You mean like your beloved Occupy groups which turned out to be a disaster? |
|
|
| (911173) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 07:43:09 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 06:35:21 2012. According to Fred, no one outside of Smaz made a big deal out of Tebow. |
|
|
| (911175) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Feb 20 08:29:56 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 07:43:09 2012. No, I said it wasn't widespread outrage like you claimed. I even gave you the latitude to include others besides SMAZ.You keep watering it down but it's not working. Your selective memory isn't working either. Just stand corrected. your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (911224) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Feb 20 10:43:10 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Feb 19 11:49:48 2012. It's not the government! It's the school.From the article, it looks like it's an inspector from the state Department of Health and Human Services, not the school. |
|
|
| (911225) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Feb 20 10:44:31 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 07:08:55 2012. Wow. It's amazing that people don't see that there is seriously something wrong here. It's way overstepping by the government.No, it's an inspector not doing his job properly. It's pretty obvious that they're only supposed to supplement, not supposed to replace a salami sandwich with chicken nuggets. |
|
|
| (911226) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Mon Feb 20 10:45:57 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Feb 19 11:49:48 2012. It's not the government! It's the school.it's a government run school therefore it is the government. |
|
|
| (911235) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Feb 20 11:54:18 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 06:38:45 2012. I don't think OWS has been a disaster for leftists. In fact, it's going to be a force going into November. |
|
|
| (911280) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Feb 20 14:59:50 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:21:21 2012. This is about conformity and not nutrition. It's again about the class warfare that the liberals are waging. Parents who pack their children's lunches are more likely conservative while parents who leave it up to the state to feed their children are more likely liberal, lazy and stupid. |
|
|
| (911284) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Feb 20 15:06:09 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Feb 19 08:19:42 2012. That's what I was saying. I don't think the policy is so wrong if they were trying to substitute more healthy foods but the substitution doesn't make any sense. |
|
|
| (911295) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Feb 20 15:31:00 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Feb 20 15:06:09 2012. I don't think the policy is so wrong if they were trying to substitute more healthy foodsYou're going too far left. |
|
|
| (911305) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Feb 20 15:43:18 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Feb 20 15:31:00 2012. I think Jeff is saying that it's ridiculous of the school to try and pass off chicken nuggets as healthy. Now I see his point. |
|
|
| (911310) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 15:57:51 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Fred G on Mon Feb 20 08:29:56 2012. There is nothing to stand corrected on. There was widespread outrage from the far left about Tebow. |
|
|
| (911312) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 15:58:32 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Feb 20 11:54:18 2012. With all the violence that ensued in the wake of it, Democrats are smart to stear clear of them. |
|
|
| (911316) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Feb 20 16:10:36 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 15:57:51 2012. Just refer back to the ravings of of selkook and the selkookette about Tebow or the constant news stories about his prayer. The left is not steeped in reality, though. |
|
|
| (911320) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Feb 20 16:20:41 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Feb 20 15:43:18 2012. It's still not right even if they were trying to give the kids "healthier" foods. It's turning the USDA into dictators. |
|
|
| (911321) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 20 16:25:50 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 06:38:45 2012. To slip into your method for a moment, "what the hell does OWS have to do with lazy parents who won't attend a PTA meeting or work on a school board and then bitch about those who do telling their kid what to eat?"Sorry ... just had to. :) |
|
|
| (911324) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Feb 20 16:51:26 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 20 16:25:50 2012. You were the one who brought up hippie protests! |
|
|
| (911325) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Feb 20 16:51:49 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 15:58:32 2012. We had a confrontation down here on Dale Mabry between police and OWS. I think it was hours after the incident in Oakland which caused the Tampa OWS to get out of hand.But the violent aspect of the OWS is not covered as much in the MSM. They're portrayed as heroes who brought the "1%" issue to the mainstream. |
|
|
| (911327) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Feb 20 16:56:10 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Feb 20 16:20:41 2012. Most leftists will support the USDA as dictators. Even centrists do. We live in a society where more and more households get free or discounted meals at school, and children live in single-parent households. The thought of a parent sending a kid to school is obnoxious to leftists. They want to state to be the ultimate parent. |
|
|
| (911340) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Feb 20 17:16:11 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Feb 20 06:38:45 2012. What disaster? You whine about the 1%, in your own context, as well. Guess what, they won. |
|
|
| (911344) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 20 17:20:30 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Feb 20 16:51:26 2012. More like "protesting like hippies" ... :) |
|
|
| (911347) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Feb 20 17:37:11 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Feb 20 16:56:10 2012. Most leftists will support the USDA as dictators. Even centrists doThose aren't real centrists. We live in a society where more and more households get free or discounted meals at school, and children live in single-parent households. The thought of a parent sending a kid to school is obnoxious to leftists. They want to state to be the ultimate parent You did read the second chapter of the Communist Manifesto, I hope . . . ? It's all in there. . . . meanwhile, exploitation of children by "the state" is no problem for the commies. |
|
|
| (911415) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Feb 20 20:31:03 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Feb 20 16:51:26 2012. No but I'm sure he'll claim that he covered the hippie movement for the Weekly Reader. :) |
|
|
| (912916) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Sat Feb 25 17:11:47 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 19 18:51:41 2012. Go back in your cave, Troll. You see Communists in every woodpile. You serve no good purpose here.I suspect this entire thread is about a NC right wing GOP school employee. |
|
|
| (913015) | |
Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Sun Feb 26 07:34:10 2012, in response to Re: Second mother comes forward with claim NC school confiscated ''unhealthy'' lunch, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 19 09:00:47 2012. Which is bullshit... |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||