|
|
| Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router (769719) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 5 |
||
|
| (769876) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Apr 24 23:35:59 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Easy on Sun Apr 24 23:26:44 2011. I think Florida is the difference. Florida broke Giuliani and we'll probably play a key role in the GOP primaries and possibly general election again.GOP is holding their convention here and the Dems in NC, both states that are expected to play a key role in 2012. Meanwhile, there is a court date on 5/2 regarding Obama's long-form. 9th Circuit Court will hear several attorneys regarding the birth certificate. LOL. |
|
|
| (769877) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:36:02 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by SMAZ on Sun Apr 24 23:28:55 2011. Yeah a man-made catastropheSo the hurricane was man made? Are you one of those kooks who believes the Bush controls the weather? a routine kiddie-porn bust. The problem is with the governments overuse SWAT teams not just with this raid Obama is responsible for that. |
|
|
| (769878) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 24 23:36:39 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:33:17 2011. Better than a runaway train in only one direction. (of either direction) |
|
|
| (769879) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:37:22 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 24 23:35:34 2011. How were the state and local governments responsible for FEMA? I asked about FEMA nothing else. |
|
|
| (769880) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Apr 24 23:37:39 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by SMAZ on Sun Apr 24 23:28:55 2011. Actually, kiddie-porn usually involves violent international criminal enterprises. Nothing to sneeze at. |
|
|
| (769881) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Apr 24 23:38:27 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:33:17 2011. That is what will happen. And that is good for the country. |
|
|
| (769882) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 24 23:39:50 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:37:22 2011. Dude, I answered your question. I said "yes", I disagreed when Bush was blamed entirely (that includes fema). I then said what was I felt was responsible for the disaster. So long as your FUCKING question was answered (in the first part, now FIVE times to be exact), what the hell difference does it make if I add more to the discussion, about what I felt WAS responsible. |
|
|
| (769883) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:40:43 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by SMAZ on Sun Apr 24 23:32:02 2011. There is more discussion of the actual subject here than there is in your post. My headline is accurate some people just object to the truth. |
|
|
| (769884) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 24 23:41:36 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Apr 24 23:38:27 2011. Correct. The govt operates BEST when one party can't control everything. We saw what a runaway train to the right can cause, and we saw what a runaway train to the left can cause. You NEED both parties to cancel eachother out. |
|
|
| (769885) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Apr 24 23:43:51 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:29:31 2011. SWAT teams are used in physical evidence-sensitive crimes because a perp can destroy the evidence before letting in Officer Snuffy after he nicely knocked on his door. |
|
|
| (769888) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:45:44 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 24 23:39:50 2011. , I disagreed when Bush was blamed entirely (that includes fema).I didn’t ask if you blamed him for everything; I asked about FEMA and nothing else. I then said what was I felt was responsible for the disaster. So long as your FUCKING question was answered (in the first part, now FIVE times to be exact), what the hell difference does it make if I add more to the discussion, about what I felt WAS responsible. So you think the state and local government are responsible for FEMA? that all asked about. |
|
|
| (769889) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 24 23:46:15 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:40:43 2011. LOL, 90% of the thread is people bashing you for the title, or about Obama's potential for relection.... |
|
|
| (769890) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Apr 24 23:47:56 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:36:02 2011. So the hurricane was man made?The hurricane didn't cause the flooding of NO. The failure of man-made levees did. But Sam Walton's daughters got a tax cut and that's what's important. How'd that Ayny Randy work out for them. Ya betcha! |
|
|
| (769891) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:47:59 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by SMAZ on Sun Apr 24 23:43:51 2011. Why not surprise the perps when they step out to go to the grocery store? |
|
|
| (769892) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Apr 24 23:48:49 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Apr 24 23:37:39 2011. This was obviously a case where they were busting the end user, not the producers and distributors. |
|
|
| (769893) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:51:49 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by SMAZ on Sun Apr 24 23:47:56 2011. Maintaining the levees would have been cheaper if democrats didn’t object to repealing the racist Davis-Beacon act and if both parties didn’t waste money on the military and the war on drugs. |
|
|
| (769894) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Apr 24 23:51:52 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:47:59 2011. LOL. Like when NYPD waited for Paul Kersey to step outside his apartment building.You're out of your mind suggesting that law enforcement should be expected to wait for a suspect to "go to the grocery store". |
|
|
| (769895) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 24 23:52:48 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:45:44 2011. I didn’t ask if you blamed him for everything; I asked about FEMA and nothing else.I never said "everything", we were talking about New Orleans, and you asked if I "object to people blaming Bush when FEMA screwed up in New Orleans", and I said YES. And that's FUCking six times now. And I said what I felt WAS the cause, a breakdown on all levels of govt, federal (including fema), state, and local. All of those things caused the disaster in New Orleans to be what it was. And I don't give a shit if you "asked me more" or not, as I answered your question six times with a "yes", I objected. Troll. |
|
|
| (769896) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Apr 24 23:56:20 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 24 23:33:16 2011. Exactly.I posted the same exact article with a sane non-political title with the intention of fostering a serious topic for discussion and as a warning that this can happen to anybody if they don't secure their wireless connection. He made it into an hysterical diatribe. |
|
|
| (769897) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:56:59 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 24 23:52:48 2011. I wasn’t asking about all entire situation I was asking about FEMA and nothing else; you keep bringing up the fact that the local government screw up as well when I never asked about it. |
|
|
| (769898) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:59:32 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by SMAZ on Sun Apr 24 23:56:20 2011. He made it into an hysterical diatribe.Chris made it into to a diatribe by making a big deal about my attention grabbing headline. |
|
|
| (769899) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:00:10 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 24 23:33:16 2011. Do you get this bent out of shape about newspaper headlines? |
|
|
| (769900) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 25 00:01:15 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:47:59 2011. Why don't you become a cop, get promoted through the ranks and when you are in a position of influence, you can suggest that.Alternatively, go run for sheriff somewhere, win and then do it that way. |
|
|
| (769901) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:04:14 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:59:32 2011. No, YOU made it a big deal by your ridiculous headline. No one is discussing the topic. That doesn't make for a "good" thread.Smaz's thread actually had the potential for rational discussion, if you didn't hijack the subject with a duplicate thread of the same topic, but with a ridiculous Obama-bashing headline. |
|
|
| (769902) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:08:27 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 25 00:01:15 2011. Let’s apply your twisted logic to other issues; if you don’t like the way health insurance companies are acting why you don’t get a job with one and work your way up the ranks; if you don’t like Bp’s environmental record why don’t you get a job for them and work your way up the ranks; if you don’t like Wall Street why don’t you work for them and make your way up the ranks.I am a citizen I have every right to criticize the government and suggest that it changes the way it acts. |
|
|
| (769903) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:09:58 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:04:14 2011. This thread would have had rational discussion if you didn’t blow a gasket over my headline. |
|
|
| (769904) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:11:27 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Sun Apr 24 23:56:59 2011. Who cares? I answered your question, "yes" (7 times now). So what the hell is your problem, your question was answered? |
|
|
| (769906) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:12:55 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:00:10 2011. If you mean "The Weekly World News", or the "National Enquirer", which your titles resemble, then no. |
|
|
| (769907) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 25 00:12:56 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dan Lawrence on Sun Apr 24 21:44:20 2011. That's not "right wing". The libertarians use it more than anyone. Do you know what a libertarian is? |
|
|
| (769909) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 25 00:13:30 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Apr 24 22:23:00 2011. Yeah . . . those that went before ye had no compunctions about feeding this troll . . . |
|
|
| (769912) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:15:13 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:09:58 2011. It would have had rational discussion if you didn't post an exaggerated title. |
|
|
| (769913) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:15:25 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:11:27 2011. The problem was you kept bringing up the local governments; blaming Bush for FEMA is different than blaming Bush for the state and local governments. |
|
|
| (769914) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:16:34 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:12:55 2011. My headlines are not different than those in the Boston Herald, New York Post or New York Daily News. |
|
|
| (769915) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:16:39 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 25 00:13:30 2011. Yes, my mistake to attempt to engage him in discussion, it won't happen again. |
|
|
| (769917) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:18:03 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:15:13 2011. You’re the one that got bent out of shape about the headline. |
|
|
| (769918) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 25 00:19:46 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:08:27 2011. If I were an executive with a health insurance company, my responsibility would be to shareholders and I would squeeze policy holders even harder than those companies already do and maximize profits to levels never seen before.A police chief is beholden to the all the citizens, not company shareholders. If you think you can better protect people than our cops do, then become one. |
|
|
| (769919) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:19:51 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:15:25 2011. This is my last post to you, as you are a troll.I answered your question "yes". I didn't "keep bringing up local governments", I answered your question you asked about Bush in regard to Fema and the meltdown in New Orleans. I answered "yes" (8 times now, and the final one), and continued in a discussion about what I felt caused it along with Fema. You then TROLLED your shit to my post, and I stupidly took the bait. I am done with you. Have a nice life. |
|
|
| (769922) | |
Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8 |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 25 00:22:23 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:15:25 2011. . |
|
|
| (769924) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:25:05 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 25 00:19:46 2011. A police chief is beholden to the all the citizensAnd that’s why as a citizen I have the right to criticize the actions of police and advocate for change through the political process. Do you believe in democracy or a dictatorship of government employees? |
|
|
| (769925) | |
Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8 |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:26:58 2011, in response to Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8, posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 25 00:22:23 2011. It's my fault, I took his bait.In my first post to him in this tirate, I thought I was engaging in a conversation with an adult. My mistake. |
|
|
| (769926) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 25 00:28:35 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:25:05 2011. And that’s why as a citizen I have the right to criticize the actions of police and advocate for change through the political process.You are gonna prompt change with ridiculous phrases like those in your subject titles? That's gonna get you taken seriously as an advocate? Why not join the Black Bloc caravan and get it over with? |
|
|
| (769928) | |
Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8 |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Mon Apr 25 00:31:37 2011, in response to Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:26:58 2011. What do you think about the Catholic Church denying communion to a boy with cystic fibrosis? |
|
|
| (769931) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:32:26 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:19:51 2011. This is my last post to you, as you are a troll.I am not a troll. I didn't "keep bringing up local governments" yes you did here, here,and here. and continued in a discussion about what I felt caused it along with Fema. I wasn’t asking about the entire situation I was asking about FEMA specifically and nothing else |
|
|
| (769934) | |
Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8 |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:34:17 2011, in response to Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8, posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 25 00:22:23 2011. I’m asking him about FEMA specifically and he keeps saying that the state and local governments screwed up as well when I wasn’t asking about them. |
|
|
| (769936) | |
Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router |
|
|
Posted by Dand124 on Mon Apr 25 00:36:02 2011, in response to Re: Obama's thugs raid mans house because he didn't password protect his Wi-Fi router, posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 25 00:28:35 2011. You are gonna prompt change with ridiculous phrases like those in your subject titles?Yes I’m raising awareness of government abuses. The more provocative headlines get more attention. |
|
|
| (769937) | |
Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8 |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:36:26 2011, in response to Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8, posted by Easy on Mon Apr 25 00:31:37 2011. Dunno, didn't read or hear about it. I don't defend religious groups too often, but can't really say as I don't know the story. |
|
|
| (769939) | |
Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8 |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Mon Apr 25 00:40:22 2011, in response to Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:36:26 2011. Basically this boy went through all of the required rituals but was not allowed first communion because they said that his mind couldn't grasp the concepts that he had learned.link |
|
|
| (769944) | |
Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Apr 25 00:44:59 2011, in response to Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8, posted by Easy on Mon Apr 25 00:40:22 2011. What a frustrating story. Some priests are out of control. Hopefully, the archdiocese, maybe even the Vatican, will get involved, and give this kid Communion.Sacred Heart happens to be the name of Tampa's oldest and most historic church. |
|
|
| (769947) | |
Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8 |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 25 00:47:15 2011, in response to Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8, posted by Easy on Mon Apr 25 00:40:22 2011. Oh wow, that's terrible. I think a church can do whatever it wants with it's rules, but I do think that is pretty bad.In any event, why do you ask? |
|
|
| (769949) | |
Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8 |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Apr 25 00:47:28 2011, in response to Re: Dand124 Asks Chris GP38 the Same Question #8, posted by Easy on Mon Apr 25 00:40:22 2011. The priest was 100% correct.One can't take the Body of Christ if they don't know what it is. What next, will she be pissed when he's denied the Sacrament of Matrimony? |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 5 |
||