|
|
| Re: Street Brawl (267) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||
|
| (482) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Mon Nov 8 18:53:30 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 8 18:50:25 2004. You might some people ideas. |
|
|
| (498) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by American Pig on Mon Nov 8 21:00:21 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by vengence on Mon Nov 8 15:49:43 2004. There were many things about the Jewish faith that I wanted to ask question about....Judaism 101 |
|
|
| (528) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 9 00:06:38 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Mon Nov 8 18:33:54 2004. I was close to where you were working at a different time during the day. I, however, was not close to where you were working at the exact time I was there.So you are no help to me. EVAR. |
|
|
| (529) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 9 00:07:16 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Mon Nov 8 18:41:31 2004. I would think the pet would be Jewish or Catholic, Islamic, etc depending on the owner.You'd be wrong. |
|
|
| (565) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 9 11:53:43 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 9 00:06:38 2004. So you're not looking for me? |
|
|
| (566) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 9 12:01:31 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 9 11:53:43 2004. Did I say that? |
|
|
| (652) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 9 20:47:58 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 9 12:01:31 2004. Are you looking? |
|
|
| (689) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by West 4th Street on Wed Nov 10 06:30:35 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 9 11:53:43 2004. Where do you ususally work and how long are your shifts? If I ever do manage to fins you, I'll call out your handle. |
|
|
| (701) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 10 09:38:28 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Tue Nov 9 20:47:58 2004. If you build it, they will come. |
|
|
| (745) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Nov 10 11:16:41 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 10 09:38:28 2004. It's built already. When will I expect you to come? |
|
|
| (747) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 10 11:17:52 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Wed Nov 10 11:16:41 2004. I tried this morning, but no one was home, and it wasn't worth my effort to look further. |
|
|
| (757) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Nov 10 11:23:06 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 10 11:17:52 2004. Maybe you were at the wrong booth. |
|
|
| (775) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 10 11:32:39 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Wed Nov 10 11:23:06 2004. How do I know that it wasn't the right booth, but the wrong time? |
|
|
| (780) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Nov 10 11:42:21 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 10 11:32:39 2004. Leave a message next time. If you had the right booth I'd be back in about 30 minutes. |
|
|
| (793) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 10 11:51:58 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Wed Nov 10 11:42:21 2004. What if your shift just ended? How would I know? |
|
|
| (797) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Wed Nov 10 11:53:39 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 10 11:51:58 2004. Ask. |
|
|
| (904) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by vengence on Wed Nov 10 22:19:40 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by American Pig on Mon Nov 8 21:00:21 2004. Wow..thanks! |
|
|
| (960) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 11 00:07:06 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Wed Nov 10 11:53:39 2004. Who would I ask? And why would they tell me? |
|
|
| (1023) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 11 10:25:35 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 11 00:07:06 2004. "Who would I ask?"Start at the first booth you pass. "And why would they tell me?" Ask nicely and say it's important. |
|
|
| (1037) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 11 10:59:31 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 11 10:25:35 2004. But it's not important. And I wouldn't have to bother the nice S/A's with this ridiculousness if you would just tell me. You can email me privately. My email address is subtalk at railfanwindow dot com. |
|
|
| (1046) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 11 11:20:53 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 11 10:59:31 2004. If it was impostant, I would have heard from you by now. |
|
|
| (1048) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 11 11:24:31 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 11 11:20:53 2004. But it's not important. |
|
|
| (1049) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 11 11:25:31 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 11 10:59:31 2004. I thought it was webmaster at railfanwindow dot com |
|
|
| (1050) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 11 11:26:25 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 11 11:24:31 2004. Definately not. |
|
|
| (1069) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 11 15:26:19 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 11 11:25:31 2004. That will work also, but I prefer the one I gave you. |
|
|
| (1070) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by aem7 on Thu Nov 11 16:01:35 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 11 11:26:25 2004. Terrapin Station owns Railfanwindow.com???? WHere do you get that money |
|
|
| (1075) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 11 16:14:28 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by aem7 on Thu Nov 11 16:01:35 2004. Are you asking me a question? |
|
|
| (3536) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 10:45:10 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 8 18:50:25 2004. It's all funny and all as a joke with the pets, but circumcision in this country is not a laughing matter. If someone would hear that they took a dog, and cut the end of it's parts off, there would be an outcry of animal cruelty, yet every day thousands of human male babies are mutlilated needlessly in this country, and on their most important and reproductive parts! This is the only country in the world that does that for non-religious reasons, although thankfully each year it lessens. It's a scam by doctors that are paid for this mutilation, that has no health benefits in modern society. It also robs a baby of a part of his body, a sexual part, that he had no choice in removing.It's bad enough this is stilll done every day for religious reasons, which is also a no choice in the matter situation, like joining a cult, but it's completely unconsciounable for it to be done for non-religious reasons, just because in the 1940's it became widespread, and "daddy" had it done. It started because they thought at the turn of the century that this would be a good cure for masturbation. Obviously that didn't work (although it is easier before circumcision), they had to find another reason for the operation. It';s the only operation that is done, and they try to find a reason afterwards to justify it. Men don't want to admidt that they lost something. If someone would be doing this to girls (as is done in prmitive countryies) people would be outraged that a part of their body was removed, but take the sensitive skin off a baby boy that had no choice is just as bad. |
|
|
| (3555) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 22 13:02:10 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 10:45:10 2004. I do agree with you that it is an unnecessary operation. In England, and most of Europe, only about 3% of men/boys are circumcised at birth. Circumcision (for non-religious reasons) started in this country in the Victorian era as a "cure" for masturbation. Of course that was silly, and that didn't work. This country was very conservative and puritanical (you think it's bad now!) back then, so people believed it was a good idea. When that didn't work, I guess they had to find another reason for doing it (no one would want to admidt that they had a piece of their penis cut off for no good reason). Doctors came up with the "health" reasons for it, and the men without their foreskins breathed a sigh of relief that they didn't loose it in vain. Of course those merits have also been deemed unnecessary. I read somewhere that a doctor charges around $200 to $300 for performing the routine baby circumcision, and they can do many a week. That's $20,000 to $40,000 of income by the end of the year, of course that's not something doctors would want to give up for an operation that lasts a few minutes, but permanently alters the body of the boy he did it too.As noted, in modern society there is no benefit for routine circumcision on baby boys. Although the frequency of the operation lowered in Canada and England (England and Canada did it as much as the US did back in the 40's and 50's), it was harder to catch on to the fact that it's a needless operation here in the US for some reason. Maybe the doctor lobby was stronger. Currently, it's rarely done in any other country but this one for non-religious reasons. And it's become much less widespread here too. I think the last time I read any stats on it, the west coast had the least done (something like 30% of boys had it done), the East coast was something like 60%, and it was the most in the midwest. |
|
|
| (3558) | |
Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 14:00:49 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 22 13:02:10 2004. I always have to be the exception to the rule, right? I was born in Europe, and was not circumcised at birth. But then I began to develop infections in my dick because the foreskin was trapping urine. The infections were painful and pretty disgusting. So eventually age 1.5 I had it done. After that I have never had a urinal infection.Health reasons? Yes there are some valid ones. But there's no reason to circumcise except when infections do develop, I think. Always wondered what I missed out on sexual sensation because I had those stupid infections as a child, but on the other hand I sometimes think I make up for that in other ways ;-) AEM7 |
|
|
| (3562) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 22 14:31:17 2004, in response to Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 14:00:49 2004. Yes, probably the exception to the rule. It doesn't make sense to circumcise boys routinely as a "preventative" medicine for a medical condition that only effects a very small percentage of boys/men.That would be like cutting off the breasts of girls because they may get breast cancer one day. Or taking out every kid's tonsils because they may cause a problem. Even an infection can be cleared up without cutting a body part off. We don't cut off someone's ear because it had an infection. The majority of men in Europe and around the world do just fine without the procedure. |
|
|
| (3563) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 14:59:09 2004, in response to Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 14:00:49 2004. And that's just it, for 95% of the boys circumcised, it was a totally unnecessary operation. Most will never have any problem"Always wondered what I missed out on sexual sensations" Trust me when I say that you have missed out - missed out on a lot. I would want that part of my body missing for anything. I feel everything that circumcised males feel, and a whole lot more! My girlfriend says it's much better too. That part of the body was not an accident of human development. It's just what someone else said. Circumcised men don't want to believe they unjustly lost out on something on their favorite body part, and for most it was cut off for absolutely NO reason, and completely against their choice. |
|
|
| (3564) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 15:00:33 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 14:59:09 2004. Typo error:"I would want that part of my body missing for anything. I feel everything that circumcised males feel, and a whole lot more!" That was meant to read: I would NOT want that part of my body missing for anything. I feel everything that circumcised males feel, and a whole lot more! |
|
|
| (3565) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 15:03:40 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 22 14:31:17 2004. That's exactly the point. It's unbelieveable that this conservative country still allows this to go on. It is mutilation of men that had no choice in the matter. If they want it done later, they can always do it. Why would anyone allow the mutliation of such a pleasurable body part? It's the repressed views people had in this country that started this ridiculous procedure, and it remains to this day. |
|
|
| (3566) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 15:09:00 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 22 13:02:10 2004. Since there are a lot of Hispanic immigrants in this country now, it will get less and less. For the most part Hispanics never bought into this procedure, so it is not widespread at all with Hispanics. It is also less common for blacks (although more than Hispanic). It's also not done in the Asian culture that much. It's mostly whites, and only non first generation immigrant whites.The only reason it's still done routinely is because fathers don't want to admidt a mistake was made with their body part. When they suck it up, and accept the fact they were unwillingly cut, maybe they can save their sons from this continuing. It worked in Europe, but unfortunately, we are a much more conservative country, and the doctors do push it for reasons mentioned. It's also safe to note than there are many Jewish doctors, and they of course believe that that part of the body is quite dispensible. |
|
|
| (3567) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 15:14:26 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 22 14:31:17 2004. It doesn't make sense to circumcise boys routinely as a "preventative" medicine for a medical condition that only effects a very small percentage of boys/men.I would agree with you that it's really not something you want to do unless you were developing infection problems. But then, it is also one of the most difficult external body parts to clean. You generally cannot clean inside the foreskin without hurting yourself, and frankly I think some parents are just too lazy/conservative to do it. Hence circumcision can be an attractive option for the parents. Here is an analogue in dentistry. In general, wisdom teeth only cause problems in a significant minority of adults. There are two failure modes: 1. mouth cavity may be too small for wisdom teeth; 2. wisdom teeth is hard to clean because of its location and can trap plague. However, most dentists recommend pre-emptive removal even for those people without apparent problems. Seems to me it is a lazyness measure. Easier to brush your teeth without wisdom teeth. Now, there's always the appendix, which is the opposite way round. Appendix are rarely preemptively removed, even though it can cause problems. So internists have bad lobby and densists have good lobby? I don't think so. I am not sure what the reason is, other than "custom". Perhaps someone ought to do some failure rate analyses on these components. Chris I did have a question for you. You seem rather bitter about this whole issue. Is this because you had been circumcised against your will? And if so do you think it has affected your sex life? I have heard an account by someone who was circumcised as an adult and he said it took away an entire dimension from his sex life, but I would ideally like to hear from more people re: this issue. Like I said in my earlier post, I don't think it affected me -- but then, you gotta think that, eh? AEM7 |
|
|
| (3569) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Peter Rosa on Mon Nov 22 15:16:25 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 22 14:31:17 2004. That would be like cutting off the breasts of girls because they may get breast cancer one day.There is a particular genetic abnormality, affecting mainly Jewish women if I recall correctly, that is associated with a hugely increased risk of breast cancer. Many women who have this abnormality, which they usually discover via genetic testing in response to a strong family history of the disease, choose to have mastectomies as a preventative measure. My LIRR/NYCT blog |
|
|
| (3571) | |
let's make this really fun Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by brooklynQB on Mon Nov 22 15:24:32 2004, in response to Street Brawl, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Nov 7 20:38:09 2004. i can just imagine. republican SIROTA with his burning cross and shotgun and 4traintowoodlawn with a box cutter and machine gun. this would rock!!!! |
|
|
| (3574) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 22 15:44:14 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 15:14:26 2004. But then, it is also one of the most difficult external body parts to clean. You generally cannot clean inside the foreskin without hurting yourselfThat's totally untrue. Chris I did have a question for you. You seem rather bitter about this whole issue. Is this because you had been circumcised against your will? And if so do you think it has affected your sex life? Me? I didn't bring this up! I was a premature baby, and they don't perform that operation routinely on premies. I left the hospital without having that done to me, and haven't had it done to this day....nor do I plan to. |
|
|
| (3581) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 22 16:03:07 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 15:14:26 2004. 2. wisdom teeth is hard to clean because of its location and can trap plague. However, most dentists recommend pre-emptive removal even for those people without apparent problems. Seems to me it is a lazyness measure. Easier to brush your teeth without wisdom teeth.Actually, I had both my wisdom teeth removed, but it wasn't preventative. One side came in crooked, and hurted like hell, the other side a few years later had the top one growing to big, and it started to mash up my gums on the bottom, so that side also was removed. I have heard an account by someone who was circumcised as an adult and he said it took away an entire dimension from his sex life, but I would ideally like to hear from more people re: this issue. Like I said in my earlier post, I don't think it affected me -- but then, you gotta think that, eh? For my personally, I could also say that it would probably take away entire dimension of feeling, and would probably adversely affect my sex life if I were to have it done as an adult. It probably did affect you, but what you don't know won't hurt you. |
|
|
| (3600) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Mon Nov 22 16:53:26 2004, in response to Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 14:00:49 2004.  Health reasons? Yes there are some valid ones. But there's no reason to circumcise except when infections do develop, I think. I have to care for elderly men as part of my nursing practice. It *is* easier to clean the circumcised than the uncircumcised. Having to take hold of that part, and pull back the skin, and then clean the sensitive skin underneath can be very uncomfortable for the patient, especially if he has issues with other guys doing it, although some of my clients would have issues with women doing it for them too. It is much easier to clean that place with a quick pass with the wash cloth while helping or changing them without having to make a production of it. Sometimes the foreskin is tight and it can be painful to clean it for them, others have more skin there and have no problem. One client insisted that he *was* circumcised when obviously he had no clue as to what circumcision consisted of. Sheesh, the guy *was* a football jock in his day, he *must* have seen other kids in the locker room. No Clue. Oh Well, I wasn't following this thread until we went here so I do not know what your issues were that prompted this line of discussion. No, I'd not circumcise some one on the 'chance that they may get infected', but I would recommend it if you have other reasons for doing so. |
|
|
| (3602) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Mon Nov 22 17:07:05 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 22 13:02:10 2004. This country was very conservative and puritanical (you think it's bad now!) back then, so people believed it was a good idea. Mr. Kellog invented Corn Flakes because they would diminish that (evil) sex drive. |
|
|
| (3604) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 17:13:06 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by Broadway Lion on Mon Nov 22 16:53:26 2004. Oh Well, I wasn't following this thread until we went here so I do not know what your issues were that prompted this line of discussion.I'm very curious about how one might feel during sex if one was not circumcised. Judging by the way that the uncircumcised talk about it, it seems that they are just attempting to differentiate themselves from the rest of us by virtue of a piece of skin. No one seem to have any real account of a before/after comparison and the one source where I have read this (COSMOPOLITAN magazine) is not exactly a scientific journal. My conclusion seems to be: this will be one of life's little mysteries, to both the circumcised and the uncircumcised alike. It is sort of like I could never understand how a colour blind person would perceive colours. And they could never know what it is like to be able to tell the difference between green and red. AEM7 |
|
|
| (3610) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by American Pig on Mon Nov 22 17:32:55 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 17:13:06 2004. It is sort of like I could never understand how a colour blind person would perceive coloursBut they have photos of what things look like for the colorblind, eg: green roses. Although I do wonder how they would know. I mean the only way to test for colorblindness is to show them to colors and see if they can tell the difference. How do color-sighted people know whether the colorblind see the flowers are green or the petals as red? |
|
|
| (3611) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 17:33:36 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 15:14:26 2004. "But then, it is also one of the most difficult external body parts to clean. You generally cannot clean inside the foreskin without hurting yourself"Are you kidding? That is completely false. It is no harder to clean than the rest of the body. This is the kind of ludicrous reaction that has been perpetuated by males that have no clue what they are talking about. Once 8 to 10 years old, it moves freely. An aroused uncircumcised male looks exactly the same as an aroused circumcised male, except the shaft skin moves a little more freely. The foreskin's purpose is to allow for the expansion of the penis. The inner skin of the foreskin becomes the outer shaftskin of the penis when it's back. The inner skin is way more sensitive than the outer skin. so not only do uncircumcise males have the ssame sensitive parts a circumcised male does, their shaft skin is also way more sensitive, and pleasurable than the shaftskin of a circumcised male, because a circumcise male doesn't even have it anymore. An unaroused uncircumcised male can look either exactly like a circumcised male or uncircumcised, and that's personal preference of the male and how he "keeps" it. There are only advantages to being uncircumcised, and unfortunately most circumcised males haven't the slightest idea what they are missing. How this crazy idea of cutting the en of the penis off began is beyond me. It's there for a reason, and it's nothing but pleasurable. Yes, you are missing something if you are cut. Most males will never face that fact though, becuase the penis is a pleasurable organ without it, but it's way more pleasurable with all it's parts. |
|
|
| (3613) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 17:35:29 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by Peter Rosa on Mon Nov 22 15:16:25 2004. That's ridiculous. Cutting off healthy body parts because 1% of people may have a problem one ay is insane. However, at least those Jewish women had a choice in the matter. Jewish males on't have a choice in loosing thier sensitive part of their penis (as well as routinely circumcised non-Jewish males). There's the difference. |
|
|
| (3616) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 17:38:07 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by Broadway Lion on Mon Nov 22 16:53:26 2004. "But then, it is also one of the most difficult external body parts to clean. You generally cannot clean inside the foreskin without hurting yourself"At least that guy enjoyed his entire life an sex as it's supposed to feel his entire life. To cut off every guys foreskin to save 1% of them problems or embarrasement because they may or may not go to a nursing home one day, or may or maynot have problems one day is insane. |
|
|
| (3618) | |
Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 17:41:18 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 17:13:06 2004. I know the pleasures I feel in that area, and that's in addition to what circumcised males feel. Uncircumcised males can feel everything circumcised males can, an in addition, there is more. I know it myself. It is impossible for circumcised males at birth to know what that area felt like.Don't give me that "just a piece of skin" crap. It's certainly not "just" a pice of skin. That is a rationalization. |
|
|
| (3621) | |
Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Mon Nov 22 17:44:09 2004, in response to Re: Street Brawl, posted by Broadway Lion on Mon Nov 22 17:07:05 2004. That's what circumcision was originally started for, to diminish the sex drive, and decrease masturbation. It was useless for that. Obviously a circumcised penis works just fine, however, it works better as it is supposed to be.If males knew WHY they started doing this, they woudn't line up to have their sons done. It's really sad that many males never get the chance, a foolish decision was made for them. |
|
|
| (3622) | |
Colour Blindness Re: Street Brawl |
|
|
Posted by aem7 on Mon Nov 22 17:44:26 2004, in response to Re: Circumcision Re: Street Brawl, posted by American Pig on Mon Nov 22 17:32:55 2004. But they have photos of what things look like for the colorblind, eg: green roses.Argh, I have a foto of a fotoshopped rose for my desktop... and it is GREEN!!! Although I do wonder how they would know. I mean the only way to test for colorblindness is to show them to colors and see if they can tell the difference. How do color-sighted people know whether the colorblind see the flowers are green or the petals as red? There you are missing the point. The colourblind see Green and Red as the SAME COLOR. That means it really doesn't matter to them whether something is red or is green, or if they see green as red or red as green. They see green and red BOTH as the same color color "gred". It's sort of like -- if you were wearing a yellow filter, then yellow and white would look like the same color to you, and they both look kind of yellow to you (but if you wear the filter for like 24 hours continuously, you will see them both as a sort of whitish yellow -- not yellow not white, but the same colour). Some colour blind people tell me that green and red both look kind of beigeish, but I have a hard time believing that, because most of my green-red colour blind friends could tell the difference between red and beige, and between green and beige. But they cannot tell the difference between green and red UNLESS the luminance is different. AEM7 |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3 |
||