|
|
| Re: ... #423 (658348) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||
|
| (659234) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Sep 3 23:57:50 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Sep 3 23:54:17 2010. it was not founded on "Christian principles."Yes it was. Why do you think the "testimony of two witnesses" clause is in Article 3 section 3 of the Constitutuion, for example? They made that very clear by adding "in any sense." Nope; the "Christian religion" is the one that crusaded against the Mussulmen. |
|
|
| (659241) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sat Sep 4 00:11:32 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Sep 3 14:31:28 2010. Do you think I give a shit about what you can or cannot "imagine". |
|
|
| (659244) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 00:16:23 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by SMAZ on Sat Sep 4 00:11:32 2010. More than you can express on here, perhaps. |
|
|
| (659249) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:24:46 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Sep 3 14:18:28 2010. Complaining about the confederate flag does not equate to wanting to ban it. What part of "I may despise what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it?" do conservatives not understand? |
|
|
| (659250) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:25:13 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Sep 3 23:49:20 2010. Keep up, simpleton. |
|
|
| (659251) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:26:54 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Sep 3 23:57:50 2010. Yes it was. Why do you think the "testimony of two witnesses" clause is in Article 3 section 3 of the Constitutuion, [sic] for example?Practicality. Do you believe that the civil prohibition of murder is a Christian principle as well? I see you didn't even bother answering my question. |
|
|
| (659254) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 00:29:30 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:26:54 2010. Do you believe that the civil prohibition of murder is a Christian principle as well?Absolutely. |
|
|
| (659255) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 00:30:35 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:25:13 2010. Bullshit is not worth keeping up on; it's only worth joking about. |
|
|
| (659266) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:43:00 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 00:29:30 2010. I guess if I want to kill people I should go to India or China or any other nation where Abrahamic religion is minor at best. |
|
|
| (659267) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:43:35 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 00:30:35 2010. Well, I do joke about you, so there you go. |
|
|
| (659269) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 00:44:30 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:43:00 2010. I didn't say "Abrahamic". No mention of the ten commandments is present in the Koran. |
|
|
| (659271) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 00:45:08 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:43:35 2010. Joking about me is really joking about yourself. |
|
|
| (659275) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:46:42 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 00:44:30 2010. Yes, thank you once again for another irrelevant response. |
|
|
| (659277) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:46:56 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:46:42 2010. ...that skirts the question. Your specialty. |
|
|
| (659278) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 00:47:21 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:46:42 2010. As you say, Sr. Moreira. |
|
|
| (659279) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:48:20 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 00:45:08 2010. Nice trick with the two different meanings of about. But I don't tend to have people joking on the topic of you around me. |
|
|
| (659287) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:53:43 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 00:47:21 2010. Confused about whom you're responding to? Explains a lot. |
|
|
| (659293) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 01:11:20 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Sep 4 00:53:43 2010. You're using the word "irrelevant" a lot. That's Moreira's favorite word. |
|
|
| (659294) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sat Sep 4 01:20:30 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Sep 3 14:18:28 2010. I wipe my ass with the Confederate flag. That's my freedom of speech. |
|
|
| (659298) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 01:40:10 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by SMAZ on Sat Sep 4 01:20:30 2010. I support your right to do that. But do you actually do that in the spirit you're implying? |
|
|
| (659316) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Sep 4 06:51:01 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Sep 3 23:44:57 2010. We don't have too many lunatic Nazis today trying to kill us en mass, so I am not too worried about it. |
|
|
| (659318) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Sep 4 06:53:43 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 01:11:20 2010. I thought it was "however"? |
|
|
| (659342) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Sep 4 13:07:31 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by SMAZ on Sat Sep 4 00:11:32 2010. Since you think everyone gives a shit about your life, which you always talk about in grand terms("When I lived in Italy" "When I(insert great SMAZ accomplishment)), I figured you want people to talk about the great life of SMAZ.Your response shows how right I am about white libs too. |
|
|
| (659345) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sat Sep 4 13:17:21 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Sep 4 13:07:31 2010. Yes, swimming in a public pool is indeed a great accomplishment, unequaled in the annals of human history.I am so proud to notice that my unprecedented endeavor has inspired legions of imitators young and old. Nobody had ever set foot in the dangerous and unforgiving waters of Astoria Pool until I led the way. Columbus and Vespucci would be proud. My feat is grand indeed. |
|
|
| (659349) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Sep 4 13:33:04 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by SMAZ on Sat Sep 4 13:17:21 2010. I hope you enjoy your Saturday. It's a beautiful day. |
|
|
| (659350) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Sep 4 13:48:37 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Sep 3 14:31:28 2010. It's weird how many whites won't swim in a pool with too many blacks and it goes beyond a (mostly inaccurate) perception that black kids are unruly. I think that there's some sort of phobia involved. |
|
|
| (659351) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Sep 4 13:52:23 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by Easy on Sat Sep 4 13:48:37 2010. It's not just the pool. It's public beaches too. That's how white people, especially liberal ones, are.But this SMAZ character, he may be the one liberal who would not mind. Although I don't think he's a real person anyway. |
|
|
| (659356) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Sep 4 14:12:21 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by SMAZ on Sat Sep 4 13:17:21 2010. Vespucci went swimming in Astoria? Ewwww! :) |
|
|
| (659487) | |
Re: ... #423 |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 20:38:58 2010, in response to Re: ... #423, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sat Sep 4 06:53:43 2010. He turns to "irrelevant" when his back is really up against the wall. |
|
|
| (659493) | |
Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim |
|
|
Posted by David Fairthorne on Sat Sep 4 21:37:04 2010, in response to Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Sep 1 20:11:03 2010. I have no tolerance for religious extremists of ANY religionI have very little tolerance for intolerant religions. |
|
|
| (659495) | |
Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 21:48:46 2010, in response to Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim, posted by David Fairthorne on Sat Sep 4 21:37:04 2010. Yeah, it's almost as bad as intolerant atheism. |
|
|
| (659499) | |
Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim |
|
|
Posted by David Fairthorne on Sat Sep 4 22:04:15 2010, in response to Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 21:48:46 2010. Yeah, it's almost as bad as intolerant atheism.I suppose you're referring to Communism. But bear in mind that not all atheists are communists. |
|
|
| (659521) | |
Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 22:55:47 2010, in response to Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim, posted by David Fairthorne on Sat Sep 4 22:04:15 2010. I always bear that in mind. Rotten thing is, communists don't.And no, I wasn't referring to communism. Is Richard Dawkins communist? |
|
|
| (659524) | |
Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Sep 4 23:00:37 2010, in response to Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 22:55:47 2010. The guy from the Family Feud? Nah, I don't think so. |
|
|
| (659529) | |
Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 23:16:07 2010, in response to Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim, posted by Easy on Sat Sep 4 23:00:37 2010. I doubt Mr. Dawson is. I don't think Dawkins is either. |
|
|
| (659531) | |
Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sat Sep 4 23:18:10 2010, in response to Re: ... in which I prove that I am not just anti-Muslim, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Sep 4 23:16:07 2010. Yah. |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||