|
|
| Does anyone here use att.net? (658712) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (658712) | |
Does anyone here use att.net? |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Thu Sep 2 12:35:48 2010 Even though cookies are enabled, 1 -2x per day the home page throws out the content I've added and puts in default content. Any idea why? |
|
|
| (658730) | |
Re: Does anyone here use att.net? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Sep 2 13:23:17 2010, in response to Does anyone here use att.net?, posted by Dave on Thu Sep 2 12:35:48 2010. I noticed that you did not say a work about the Qantas Boeing 747 making an emergency landing when one engine cover was ripped to shreds. Typical of you to back off in the face of facts. |
|
|
| (658733) | |
Re: Does anyone here use att.net? |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Thu Sep 2 13:27:24 2010, in response to Re: Does anyone here use att.net?, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Sep 2 13:23:17 2010. Wait |
|
|
| (658735) | |
Re: Does anyone here use att.net? |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Thu Sep 2 13:28:19 2010, in response to Re: Does anyone here use att.net?, posted by cortelyounext on Thu Sep 2 13:27:24 2010. Disregard... |
|
|
| (658750) | |
Re: Does anyone here use att.net? |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Thu Sep 2 14:29:13 2010, in response to Re: Does anyone here use att.net?, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Sep 2 13:23:17 2010. I noticed you didn't say anything about the derailment in Ft. Worth on Monday I posted about. Why aren't you shouting from the rooftops about how unsafe train travel is? I mean, OMG!, those tracks are shared with a commuter railroad!!Oh, I forgot...you're an aerophobe, not a siderodromophobe. |
|
|