|
|
| I told you so.....you'd miss him (574124) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
| (574124) | |
I told you so.....you'd miss him |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 11:48:18 2010 http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/08/do-you-miss-him-yet/God, it must suck to be a Bush hater right now. |
|
|
| (574127) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Mar 9 11:56:01 2010, in response to I told you so.....you'd miss him, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 11:48:18 2010. Nah. Posting multiple stories about the same billboard won't make us miss him. |
|
|
| (574132) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Mar 9 12:00:07 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by Easy on Tue Mar 9 11:56:01 2010. You're right....and if you read the feedback you'll see there's LOTS of people that don't miss him one iota as well. Myself included. |
|
|
| (574146) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 12:27:42 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by Easy on Tue Mar 9 11:56:01 2010. The story mentioned it, it was not about it. |
|
|
| (574178) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Tue Mar 9 14:34:43 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by Easy on Tue Mar 9 11:56:01 2010. I don't miss Bush either, but Obama has proven himself to not be up to the job either. And I never liked McCain, war hero and all.The last President I really liked was Bill Clinton. I'd vote for him again today if I could. |
|
|
| (574180) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Tue Mar 9 14:36:32 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by Mitch45 on Tue Mar 9 14:34:43 2010. I liked McCain in 2000, but not so much in 2008. |
|
|
| (574195) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Tue Mar 9 14:57:32 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by Mitch45 on Tue Mar 9 14:34:43 2010. I'd vote for him [Bill Clinton] again today if I could.Agreed. |
|
|
| (574196) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Mar 9 15:00:42 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by R42 4820 on Tue Mar 9 14:57:32 2010. Yep. And/or his wife. Wish she had won,we'd have healthcare by now,a jobs program and a stimulus that would have done plenty, instead of just more taxcuts. |
|
|
| (574198) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 15:04:02 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by R42 4820 on Tue Mar 9 14:57:32 2010. So would I, he is the lesser evil. Best thing Clinton ever did was accept reality in 1994 and adopt GOP positions. That led to the late 90's economic boom. |
|
|
| (574211) | |
Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 15:20:21 2010, in response to I told you so.....you'd miss him, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 11:48:18 2010. Hahaha, and in the NY Times yet!! |
|
|
| (574213) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 15:21:47 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by Mitch45 on Tue Mar 9 14:34:43 2010. I'd probably vote for Clinton again if he was able to run. I don't think I would vote for Bush again, but I at least respected the man. I won't miss Obama in the least in 2012. |
|
|
| (574214) | |
Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Mar 9 15:23:04 2010, in response to Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 15:20:21 2010. Hahaha, and in the NY Times yet!!So it must be false! |
|
|
| (574215) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 15:23:12 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 15:04:02 2010. Yes, and that's when I really began to like him....enough to vote for him in 1996. As I said, I probably would have voted for him in 2000 too, if he was able to run. I hated Gore, so did vote for Bush however. |
|
|
| (574222) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 15:32:39 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 15:21:47 2010. I would vote for President Bush again in a heartbeat. I never did and never would vote for the stain maker from Harlem USA. Mr. Clinton governed acording to the polls. Mr. Bush is a STRONG leader that governed according to what he believed was the way to go based on the current issues on the table. I.E. he tried to pass social security reform, he pushed through a prescription drug plan, etc.. many of his policies went against the grain of us on the extreme right, but he felt it was the way to go and he acted.Clinton was a lying opportunistic puppet. |
|
|
| (574227) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 15:37:00 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 15:32:39 2010. I didn't like a lot of Clinton's policy either, however, at least he DID govern according to what people really want. Obama doesn't give two shits about what "the people" want, only what he and his elitist cronies want. |
|
|
| (574229) | |
Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 15:37:44 2010, in response to Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Mar 9 15:23:04 2010. What they print is usually Gospel to you guys, so.... |
|
|
| (574230) | |
Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 15:38:18 2010, in response to Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 15:37:44 2010. ....and an op ed piece can't be "true or false", it's just that....an op ed. |
|
|
| (574232) | |
Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 15:39:56 2010, in response to I told you so.....you'd miss him, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 11:48:18 2010. One can NEVER get enough Bush ... |
|
|
| (574259) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 16:27:55 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Mar 9 15:37:00 2010. okay. Look at how Clinton hooked up with Newt to sign off on welfare reform. He infuriated people by doing this. He raised taxes in 1993, He did not even acknowledge the war on terror after we were hit in 1993. Look at the pardons Mark Rich etc.. Look at the way his people looted the white house when they thankfully left. I understand thst they took the W off of the key boards."I did not have sexual relations with that woman!" He looked us in the eye and lied to us! He called Mario (Sfacheem) Cuomo a mafioso!, he made ac comment about Obama getting us coffee a few years ago and he made other racially insensitive coments during Hillary's campaign, He won with 42% of the vote in 1992. I can go on and on. This guy IMHO is a F in disgrace. Lets definately not forget his PC policy in 1995 that made it difficult for the CIA & FBI from sharring information. I would love to know what was in Sandy Berger's socks. |
|
|
| (574264) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Tue Mar 9 16:33:51 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 15:04:02 2010. Not to mention he took the country out of debt which reluctantly Bush put us back into. |
|
|
| (574271) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 16:43:09 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 15:04:02 2010. Thank you Newt |
|
|
| (574274) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 16:48:41 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by R42 4820 on Tue Mar 9 16:33:51 2010. yea but President Bush had two wars and 9/11 to deal with. Despite this we had a pretty good economy for most of his presidency. the Corpsman spent more money in one year than any president from washington to Bush 43 combined. |
|
|
| (574279) | |
Bush Not Missed |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Tue Mar 9 16:52:35 2010, in response to I told you so.....you'd miss him, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 11:48:18 2010. Once again, you did not read the whole article.There is no support in it for the proposition that he is being missed. |
|
|
| (574286) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Tue Mar 9 16:56:17 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 16:27:55 2010. Yes, Clinton was a sex maniac. So what? He was still a good President. I'd rather have a competent sex maniac as President than a phoney-baloney Marxist like Obama. |
|
|
| (574289) | |
Re: Bush Not Missed |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 16:57:08 2010, in response to Bush Not Missed, posted by italianstallion on Tue Mar 9 16:52:35 2010. I did read the article.I read them all before posting. |
|
|
| (574290) | |
Re: Bush Not Missed |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Tue Mar 9 16:57:43 2010, in response to Re: Bush Not Missed, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 16:57:08 2010. Coulda fooled me. |
|
|
| (574294) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 17:02:30 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by Mitch45 on Tue Mar 9 16:56:17 2010. I totally disagree. I could csre less if Clintonhit every skirt in Washington. Heck I wish I could LOL, the issue is he looked me in the eye on TV and LIED to my face. I could care less if he lied about the color of the Lincoln bedroom's wallpaper. THe point is he LIED to the World on TV!!!! He should not have done that and then I would not be as over the top about it. He should not hav emade that statement. Why go on the stand and do that? THat is the same crap Patterson did last week when he made the statement that he never abused his office. THese guys think there are two sets of rules. |
|
|
| (574303) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 17:07:01 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 16:48:41 2010. And to think ... those wars could have been done "pay as you go" by appealing to patriotic need. Instead, he told us to go on a credit card spree instead. Some leadership. :( |
|
|
| (574307) | |
Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Mar 9 17:14:55 2010, in response to I told you so.....you'd miss him, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 11:48:18 2010. FIU, good school. So I finally found someone else who said what I did. You're going to miss him. |
|
|
| (574311) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 17:19:56 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 17:07:01 2010. We will agree to disagree. |
|
|
| (574314) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 17:29:01 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 17:19:56 2010. Kewl. :) |
|
|
| (574316) | |
Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him |
|
|
Posted by busdude2 on Tue Mar 9 17:32:02 2010, in response to I told you so.....you'd miss him, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 9 11:48:18 2010. I never thought I would say it but I would rather have him back in office. |
|
|
| (574317) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 17:32:24 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 17:29:01 2010. I gotta learn these abbrivations, what's KEWL |
|
|
| (574318) | |
Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him |
|
|
Posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 17:33:53 2010, in response to Re: I told you so.....you'd miss him, posted by busdude2 on Tue Mar 9 17:32:02 2010. Yea Baby. ANd before I get pounced on, wasn't Laura a terrific first Lady that helpped so many? |
|
|
| (574331) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Tue Mar 9 18:16:28 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 17:32:24 2010. It means "cool" lol |
|
|
| (574341) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 18:29:46 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 17:32:24 2010. "Dewd-speak" for cool ... as in city-speak for "we agree, no need to yammer on." :) |
|
|
| (574351) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 18:37:26 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 18:29:46 2010. You mean "It's Like dat?" LOL! |
|
|
| (574356) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 18:43:35 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 18:37:26 2010. Why SOITENLY! Nyuk-nyuk-nyuk. :) |
|
|
| (574366) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 18:51:33 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 18:43:35 2010. oh yea Fuggedaboutit!! |
|
|
| (574367) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 18:52:52 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 18:51:33 2010. You talkin' to me? :) |
|
|
| (574370) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 18:55:47 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Mar 9 18:52:52 2010. lol |
|
|
| (574699) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Mar 10 04:42:20 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by Mitch45 on Tue Mar 9 16:56:17 2010. Umm, one blow job does not a sex maniac make. |
|
|
| (574724) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Mar 10 07:23:03 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Mar 10 04:42:20 2010. One? LOL!!!! |
|
|
| (574726) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Mar 10 07:33:56 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Mar 10 07:23:03 2010. Even if there was more than one it still doesn't make the man a sex addict. Seems Mitch thinks anyone who gets more than he does is a sex addict. |
|
|
| (574727) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Mar 10 07:38:14 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Mar 10 07:33:56 2010. Agreed.More like incredibly stupid that he thought he wouldn't get caught. |
|
|
| (574728) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Mar 10 07:39:56 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Mar 10 07:38:14 2010. There have been many that were never caught, you can take that to the bank |
|
|
| (574730) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by R42 4820 on Wed Mar 10 08:25:12 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by rbseabeach on Tue Mar 9 16:48:41 2010. The way I see it, if Bush was never elected into office, 9/11 probably would have never happened. That's just my honest feeling. |
|
|
| (574745) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Mar 10 09:30:00 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by R42 4820 on Wed Mar 10 08:25:12 2010. Oh please. |
|
|
| (574805) | |
Re: Bush missed |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 10 11:46:40 2010, in response to Re: Bush not missed, posted by R42 4820 on Wed Mar 10 08:25:12 2010. Absurd assumption. The USA doesn't become and un-become the "Great Satan" due to whomever is running the country. The only way the USA would stop being a target of Jihadists is if we became the Islamic States of America, and Twelver Shi'ite at that, recognizing the Supreme Leader in Tehran as the Caliph. |
|
|
| (574809) | |
Re: Bush not missed |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Wed Mar 10 11:54:02 2010, in response to Re: Bush missed, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 10 11:46:40 2010. I agree, but still don't miss him. Does this mean that we will always be at war with Islamic countries/Islamic terrorism until there is a winner? |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|