Re: Babe wars! (524835) | |
![]() |
|
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 3 of 3 |
![]() |
(525343) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 17 14:54:40 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 17 13:17:20 2009. I think maybe marge could use a makeover. the show is on for over 20 years and they could change a few things. |
|
![]() |
(525344) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Nov 17 14:55:53 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 17 14:54:40 2009. They switched to HD. They also suck more. So that's enough IMO. |
|
![]() |
(525349) | |
Re: Babe wars! (Melody Patterson, Elizabeth Montgomery) |
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 17 15:11:34 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars! (Melody Patterson, Elizabeth Montgomery), posted by Dan on Tue Nov 17 13:31:07 2009. My vote is for Ellie Mae![]() your pal, Fred |
|
![]() |
(525351) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 17 15:21:08 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Nov 17 14:55:53 2009. The recent Treehouse of horrors was pretty good this year [alfred hitchcock and 28days later parodies], but the last segment sucked big time. The worst part about it was that it was just a play and no one really died.The previous year the peanuts parody was the main good thing about it, but it was pretty weak. |
|
![]() |
(525392) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Nov 17 16:56:11 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Nov 17 14:55:53 2009. They switched to HD.Marge's wrinkles are lot more apparent in HD. |
|
![]() |
(525401) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Nov 17 17:23:52 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 17 15:21:08 2009. I think the concept of making fun of plays is funny. |
|
![]() |
(525413) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Nov 17 18:17:58 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Nov 17 00:56:16 2009. Lol! |
|
![]() |
(525441) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Tue Nov 17 20:24:23 2009, in response to Babe wars!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Nov 16 14:38:40 2009. There's always Jessica Simpson !![]() Bill Newkirk |
|
![]() |
(525448) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Nov 17 20:33:50 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by Newkirk Images on Tue Nov 17 20:24:23 2009. That's just an unflattering pose. She'd look good if she stood up. |
|
![]() |
(525451) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Tue Nov 17 20:36:05 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Nov 17 20:33:50 2009. That's just an unflattering pose. She'd look good if she stood up.Probably taken without her knowledge. Bill Newkirk |
|
![]() |
(525456) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Tue Nov 17 20:39:16 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Nov 17 00:56:16 2009. Oh dear ... now it's coming down to WHICH lips? :)Leave Mick Jagger out of this ! ![]() Bill Newkirk |
|
![]() |
(525470) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 17 20:52:12 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Nov 17 17:23:52 2009. yeah but it was pretty lame and tame for a THoH. |
|
![]() |
(525476) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Nov 17 20:58:43 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by SMAZ on Tue Nov 17 16:56:11 2009. She needs a face lift. |
|
![]() |
(525477) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Nov 17 20:59:17 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by Newkirk Images on Tue Nov 17 20:39:16 2009. Those ain't lips ... THESE is lips ...![]() |
|
![]() |
(525489) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Tue Nov 17 21:10:33 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Nov 17 20:58:43 2009. maybe she should get boob implants again :) |
|
![]() |
(525691) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by SMAZ on Wed Nov 18 09:14:30 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Nov 17 20:59:17 2009. THESE are LIPS!!I think we just destroyed this thread. |
|
![]() |
(525782) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Wed Nov 18 13:56:20 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by SMAZ on Wed Nov 18 09:14:30 2009. With a pair of lips like that, he could kiss a fire hydrant and make it disappear !Bill Newkirk |
|
![]() |
(525817) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Wed Nov 18 16:43:04 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by Newkirk Images on Wed Nov 18 13:56:20 2009. Can we get back to talking about girls with DSL? The fourth thing I look for in a girl after booty, face, and tatas. |
|
![]() |
(525963) | |
Re: Babe wars! |
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Wed Nov 18 20:48:56 2009, in response to Re: Babe wars!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 17 12:26:13 2009. Well it doesn't help that channels like E! keeps giving her attention... |
|
![]() |
Page 3 of 3 |