|
|
| Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? (518268) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (518268) | |
Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 11:27:09 2009 Are we now officially a third world country? I always here a lot about GOP voter fraud schemes, but it seems the only fraud charges that ever have substance involve Democrats:http://www.electionjournal.org/2009/11/03/video-terrified-voter-says-nj-dems-using-gangbangers-for-gotv/ **VIDEO** Terrified Voter says NJ Dems Using Gangbangers for GOTV November 3, 2009 by EJ How would you like to be a New Jersey police officer and look out your window and see several known criminals, including a man you arrested several weeks ago and another who had just been released from prison for shooting a cop? And then find out that the men were sent into the neighborhood by the Democratic Party for GOTV operations - complete with lists of voters names, addresses and phones numbers! That is what happened Sunday on a quiet street in Morris Township. The officer, who’s name we are with holding, specifically heard the men discussing that he was a police officer and that they now know where he lives. The officer confronted the men and they took off. He contacted the local police who responded and caught up with them and about a dozen other men a few blocks away. According to the police report, the men were known criminals and when asked why they were in the neighborhood they stated they were “campaigning for the Democratic Party.” Below is an interview with another Morris Township resident who also witnessed the gangbangers going door to door. She contacted a local Democratic Party Official who sent her an email stating “Thanks for writing. Yes, I heard about this and am very sorry for the incident.” Shockingly, this isn’t the first time New Jersey Democrats have used gang bangers for GOTV. According to this story on PolitickerNJ, the Bloods Street gang stole $6000 from the NJ Democratic State Committee through a check fraud scheme. NJ Democratic Party Chairman Joseph Cryan said “that checks were copied from payments sent out for the party’s 2006 field operation.” It’s 9:00 AM and things are just heating up in Jersey. |
|
|
| (518290) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Nov 3 13:45:19 2009, in response to Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 11:27:09 2009. "don't belong in the neighborhood. You can tell". LOL |
|
|
| (518291) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 13:53:41 2009, in response to Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 11:27:09 2009. What is this, the pre-spin show? If the GOP candidates win, we'll never hear about this again?your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (518330) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Nov 3 16:34:48 2009, in response to Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 11:27:09 2009. This is such an obvious lie that it's actually somewhat hilarious. |
|
|
| (518356) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Tue Nov 3 17:04:36 2009, in response to Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 11:27:09 2009. well, that black guy who wants to talk about race ain't going to charge them. Like the ones in phillybtw, maybe one day they'll outlaw messenger ballots, they did that in everystate for the most recent stolen election: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703932904574511612622116146.html The race for governor in New Jersey is so close in final polls that it may well end up in a recount -- the 1981 election did and was decided by less than 1,800 votes. If there is a recount, you can bet disputes about absentee ballots will loom large. Moreover, if serious allegations of fraud emerge, you can also expect less-than-vigorous investigation by the Obama Justice Department -- which showed just how seriously it takes such allegations when it walked away from an open-and-shut voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party in Philadelphia earlier this year. Plenty of reasons exist for suspecting absentee fraud may play a significant role in tomorrow's Garden State contests. Groups associated with Acorn in neighboring Pennsylvania and New York appear to have moved into the state. An independent candidate for mayor in Camden has already leveled charges that voter fraud is occurring in his city. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party in New Jersey is taking advantage of a new loosely written vote-by-mail law to pressure county clerks not to vigorously use signature checks to evaluate the authenticity of absentee ballots, the only verification procedure allowed. The state has received a flood of 180,000 absentee ballot requests. On some 3,000 forms the signature doesn't match the one on file with county clerks. Yet citing concerns that voters would be disenfranchised, Democratic Party lawyer Paul Josephson wrote New Jersey's secretary of state asking her "to instruct County Clerks not to deny applications on the basis of signature comparison alone." Mr. Josephson maintained that county clerks "may be overworked and are likely not trained in handwriting analysis" and insisted that voters with suspect applications should be allowed to cast provisional ballots. Those ballots, of course, would then provide a pool of votes that would be subject to litigation in any recount, with the occupant of New Jersey's highest office determined by Florida 2000-style scrutiny of ballot applications. Absentee voter fraud is in danger of becoming a hardy perennial in New Jersey. Atlantic City Councilman Marty Small and 13 campaign workers were indicted in September on charges of conspiring to commit election fraud using absentee ballots. One worker pleaded guilty last month. In Newark, five campaign workers were indicted in August on charges involving absentee ballot fraud. Victor Negron, a campaign adviser for independent mayoral candidate Roberto Feliz, a former director of Camden's public works department, says he's shocked that more than fifteen times the normal number of voters are casting absentee ballots in Camden this year. In the 2005, when the city's voters voted for both governor and mayor on the same day, only 200 absentee ballots were cast. This year, some 3,700 have already been received. At least four voters have approached the Feliz campaign to complain that an absentee ballot was sent to them without their permission or cast for them without their understanding the documents they were signing. I spoke with Uremia Rojas who reports that "a man with a clipboard knocked on my door and had me sign something so I could vote by mail. I was skeptical but signed and got a ballot. I never really wanted one." Says Mr. Negron: "We believe this to be underhanded and a possibly illegal strategy by the Democratic Party to undermine the civil rights of the residents of Camden." ..... 15times equals 1500% for you obama voters |
|
|
| (518378) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Tue Nov 3 18:03:19 2009, in response to Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 11:27:09 2009. What exactly is a "gangbanger"? Outside the porn sense, that is.Is that the same as a gang member? |
|
|
| (518435) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 19:49:16 2009, in response to Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 13:53:41 2009. If the GOP candidates win, we'll never hear about this again?I will be sure to remind you. |
|
|
| (518437) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Tue Nov 3 19:50:11 2009, in response to Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 13:53:41 2009. So that makes it right ? |
|
|
| (518439) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Nov 3 19:51:54 2009, in response to Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by SMAZ on Tue Nov 3 16:34:48 2009. why do you hate America so much? |
|
|
| (518442) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 19:58:25 2009, in response to Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 19:49:16 2009. No you won't.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (518460) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Tue Nov 3 20:23:59 2009, in response to Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 11:27:09 2009. I have to believe that the police officer is being less than truthful though; he has something to hide. |
|
|
| (518461) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Tue Nov 3 20:24:59 2009, in response to Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Nov 3 19:51:54 2009. Because he doesn't; he only hates liars, and this person claiming so is either misrepresenting himself as a cop or is hiding something else (i.e., he sold his badge out to people who are now after him). |
|
|
| (518463) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 20:30:04 2009, in response to Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 19:58:25 2009. I promise. |
|
|
| (518465) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 20:34:36 2009, in response to Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Nov 3 20:30:04 2009. I'll hold you to it.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (518468) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 20:45:09 2009, in response to Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by R143 on Tue Nov 3 19:50:11 2009. Dude you're so loaded for bear you don't even know what we're talking about. I'm saying that if Corzine loses, you won't hear anything about this alleged occurence ever again. Damn, you just wanna fight.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (518487) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Nov 3 21:33:13 2009, in response to Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 20:45:09 2009. His posting makes my head spin. |
|
|
| (518835) | |
Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters? |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Wed Nov 4 05:12:06 2009, in response to Re: Democrats using gangbangers to intimidate voters?, posted by AMoreira81 on Tue Nov 3 20:24:59 2009. Truth. |
|
|