|
|
| USS New York (518071) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (518071) | |
USS New York |
|
|
Posted by Doctor B on Mon Nov 2 17:28:27 2009 USS New York pauses at the WTC site this morning. |
|
|
| (518073) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Mon Nov 2 17:31:26 2009, in response to USS New York, posted by Doctor B on Mon Nov 2 17:28:27 2009. Beautiful photo, exquisite!!! |
|
|
| (518078) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 2 18:07:51 2009, in response to USS New York, posted by Doctor B on Mon Nov 2 17:28:27 2009. THANK YOU!! |
|
|
| (518096) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Nov 2 18:41:09 2009, in response to USS New York, posted by Doctor B on Mon Nov 2 17:28:27 2009. Thanks, B, that's an excellent shot.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (518125) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by tbev on Mon Nov 2 20:04:40 2009, in response to USS New York, posted by Doctor B on Mon Nov 2 17:28:27 2009. That is a beautiful shot of a beautiful ship , I saw it being turned around when I was driving thru Edgewater. The police were racing to the marina to catch a glimpse of her. |
|
|
| (518147) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Mon Nov 2 21:10:28 2009, in response to USS New York, posted by Doctor B on Mon Nov 2 17:28:27 2009. Gorgeous! |
|
|
| (518154) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Nov 2 21:25:34 2009, in response to USS New York, posted by Doctor B on Mon Nov 2 17:28:27 2009. Nice pic. That's a cool looking ship. |
|
|
| (518155) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Nov 2 21:29:43 2009, in response to Re: USS New York, posted by SMAZ on Mon Nov 2 21:25:34 2009. Whenever they execute Khalid Sheik Mohammed and other 9/11 people, they should do so on that ship or on the USS Cole. |
|
|
| (518165) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Mon Nov 2 21:43:19 2009, in response to USS New York, posted by Doctor B on Mon Nov 2 17:28:27 2009. Looks like a Helo and an Osprey on the stern. Nice shot. |
|
|
| (518177) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Nov 2 22:36:24 2009, in response to Re: USS New York, posted by SMAZ on Mon Nov 2 21:29:43 2009. Wow! We are agreeing a lot this evening! |
|
|
| (518188) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Mon Nov 2 22:49:34 2009, in response to Re: USS New York, posted by SMAZ on Mon Nov 2 21:29:43 2009. Method of execution:throw him into the rotor blades of the ospry or a cobra :) or have a cobra fire off a few rounds into him :) |
|
|
| (518189) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Nov 2 22:53:13 2009, in response to Re: USS New York, posted by Grand Concourse on Mon Nov 2 22:49:34 2009. Too merciful. |
|
|
| (518199) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by Grand Concourse on Mon Nov 2 23:30:22 2009, in response to Re: USS New York, posted by SMAZ on Mon Nov 2 22:53:13 2009. But entertaining :D |
|
|
| (518234) | |
Re: USS New York CITY? |
|
|
Posted by Jersey Mike on Tue Nov 3 08:28:28 2009, in response to USS New York, posted by Doctor B on Mon Nov 2 17:28:27 2009. Shouldn't that by the USS New York CITY. Only capitol ships are named after states and today that would be pretty much be a Carrier Vessel, or Nuclear Submarine. Besides, I don't recall the 9/11 hijackers crashing into anything upstate. |
|
|
| (518235) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by Jersey Mike on Tue Nov 3 08:29:16 2009, in response to Re: USS New York, posted by cortelyounext on Mon Nov 2 21:43:19 2009. Better hope the Osprey doesn't try to take off. We'll have aircraft crashing into things all over again. |
|
|
| (518279) | |
Re: USS New York CITY? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 12:11:04 2009, in response to Re: USS New York CITY?, posted by Jersey Mike on Tue Nov 3 08:28:28 2009. Trident subs were named after states and fast attacks were named after cities. Seawolf has a different convention, given the 3 of them, Seawolf, Connecticut and Jimmy Carter. Carriers seem to be named after Presidents.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (518284) | |
Re: USS New York CITY? |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Nov 3 12:55:04 2009, in response to Re: USS New York CITY?, posted by Jersey Mike on Tue Nov 3 08:28:28 2009. Shouldn't that by the USS New York CITY.No, because "New York" is the name of the City. |
|
|
| (518300) | |
Re: USS New York CITY? |
|
|
Posted by Jersey Mike on Tue Nov 3 15:16:12 2009, in response to Re: USS New York CITY?, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Nov 3 12:55:04 2009. That distinction has been made in the past. |
|
|
| (518345) | |
Re: USS New York CITY? |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Nov 3 16:49:12 2009, in response to Re: USS New York CITY?, posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 12:11:04 2009. They should name trains after SubChatters. |
|
|
| (518346) | |
Re: USS New York CITY? |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Nov 3 16:50:06 2009, in response to Re: USS New York CITY?, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue Nov 3 12:55:04 2009. No, because "New York" is the name of the City.It's also the name of the county. |
|
|
| (518397) | |
Re: USS New York CITY? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 18:51:27 2009, in response to Re: USS New York CITY?, posted by SMAZ on Tue Nov 3 16:49:12 2009. You mean some of the luminaries here?your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (518432) | |
Re: USS New York |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Tue Nov 3 19:46:35 2009, in response to USS New York, posted by Doctor B on Mon Nov 2 17:28:27 2009. This is great . Thank you . |
|
|
| (518842) | |
Re: USS New York CITY? |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Wed Nov 4 05:55:37 2009, in response to Re: USS New York CITY?, posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 3 18:51:27 2009. Absoluletly. |
|
|