|
|
| Re: Rejection by women = massacre (482252) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (482538) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by R PansePCC on Thu Aug 6 05:00:34 2009, in response to Re: Rejection by women = massacre, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 5 19:50:01 2009. His rambling went from non believer to thinking God would save him after his killings. That's the way I read it. |
|
|
| (482539) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 6 05:13:12 2009, in response to Re: Rejection by women = massacre, posted by R PansePCC on Thu Aug 6 05:00:34 2009. Do you read his rant about the right-wing guy he hated?His rant on his sister-in-law is also worth reading. |
|
|
| (482553) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Thu Aug 6 09:02:00 2009, in response to Re: Rejection by women = massacre, posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 5 23:19:40 2009. It seems that his sadness came primarily from loneliness, from not having a steady female companion and his advancing age convinced him that it's never gonna happen…what he sought was a wife or some kind of steady partner.Had he not done we did, I would have felt sorry for him. This guy was reminiscing on bad things too much. I agree. I've had my fair share of loneliness and rejection, and the recurring problem I have is that the women that I have an interest in are either already in a relationship, or are otherwise not interested in me. It's a vicious cycle. |
|
|
| (482556) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Thu Aug 6 09:07:53 2009, in response to Re: Rejection by women = massacre, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 6 05:13:12 2009. Despite the fact he said he hated religion, this quote leads me to believe he had a little bit of faith. It may or may not be a bit misguided, but reading the Bible and leaning about the things in it relating to salvation, led him to write this, as his own understanding of what is written there:Maybe soon, I will see God and Jesus. At least that is what I was told. Eternal life does NOT depend on works. If it did, we will all be in hell. Christ paid for EVERY sin, so how can I or you be judged BY GOD for a sin when the penalty was ALREADY paid. People judge but that does not matter. I was reading the Bible and The Integrity of God beginning yesterday, because soon I will see them. |
|
|
| (482557) | |
Re: Rejection (not Misogyny) = massacre |
|
|
Posted by R36 #9346 on Thu Aug 6 09:16:23 2009, in response to Misogyny = massacre, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 5 16:24:33 2009. I interpreted his writing as not hating women (the definition of misogyny), but his consistent and repeated rejection by women for an extended period of time. If he hated women, why did he go on dates with them?Where do you see misogyny? |
|
|
| (482560) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Aug 6 10:14:43 2009, in response to Re: Rejection by women = massacre, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 5 19:50:01 2009. He had no faith in HIMSELF...Lots of people out there like that... |
|
|
| (482564) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Thu Aug 6 10:33:31 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by BMT Guy on Wed Aug 5 23:43:45 2009. Or Roseanne Barr?Let's not forget Ms. Congeniality !  Bill Newkirk |
|
|
| (482565) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Thu Aug 6 10:36:16 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 5 23:28:08 2009. Agreed. This guy should have just used his savings and moved somewhere and started anew even if it were in some Third World country where 250k would have meant a comfortable retirement at 48 years old.Something tells me even if he relocated, he would have had issues with women no matter what locale. Bill Newkirk |
|
|
| (482566) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Thu Aug 6 10:37:32 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by Peter Rosa on Wed Aug 5 21:50:24 2009. From what I've read, his Usenet postings from the late 1990's show something quite different, he was actually quite social.Another victim of the women shortage ? Bill Newkirk |
|
|
| (482567) | |
Re: Rejection (not Misogyny) = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Peter Rosa on Thu Aug 6 10:45:25 2009, in response to Re: Rejection (not Misogyny) = massacre, posted by R36 #9346 on Thu Aug 6 09:16:23 2009. Siggy has put up a selection of Sodini links, including one to his (possible) daughter's Facebook page.My LIRR/NYCT blog |
|
|
| (482581) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Andrew Kirschner on Thu Aug 6 12:11:43 2009, in response to Misogyny = massacre, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 5 16:24:33 2009. Yeah, while I can feel a twinge of sympathy for his frustration, nonetheless we should call a spade a spade. This absoultely is misogyny, and it is pathological--more than that in fact, it's a destructive pathology in our entire culture. You can't blame womankind for a man not getting any. Fellas, get a grip! |
|
|
| (482736) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Thu Aug 6 17:42:42 2009, in response to Rejection by women = massacre, posted by Peter Rosa on Wed Aug 5 09:55:16 2009. Sounds like all the libs during the last election. |
|
|
| (482760) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Union Turnpike on Thu Aug 6 18:56:50 2009, in response to Misogyny = massacre, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Aug 5 16:24:33 2009. But he wrote 1982 was the very last time - he was only 21 if true. |
|
|
| (482770) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Aug 6 19:24:59 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by Newkirk Images on Thu Aug 6 10:36:16 2009. Something tells me even if he relocated, he would have had issues with women no matter what locale.Agreed but that would still leave him with the "Leaving Las Vegas" option. At least it would have been victimless. |
|
|
| (482862) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by BMT Guy on Fri Aug 7 00:52:14 2009, in response to Rejection by women = massacre, posted by Peter Rosa on Wed Aug 5 09:55:16 2009. Peter, ya know at first glance at George Sodini's photograph I had thought that it was our very own 'John' (formerly aka Qtraindash7) from Sea Cliff that when on a massacre. The resemblance is uncanny! |
|
|
| (482864) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by BMT Guy on Fri Aug 7 00:55:45 2009, in response to Re: Rejection by women = massacre, posted by vfrt on Wed Aug 5 13:37:13 2009. Again, these sick puppies ALWAYS do these things backwards.....they forget to shot themselves in the head FIRST! |
|
|
| (482866) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by BMT Guy on Fri Aug 7 00:58:26 2009, in response to Re: Rejection by women = massacre, posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 5 23:19:40 2009. I guess his only companionship was Sally and her five sisters! :-O |
|
|
| (482868) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Aug 7 01:00:12 2009, in response to Re: Rejection by women = massacre, posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 5 23:19:40 2009. According to the left-wing blogs, this guy was a right-wing nut, inspired by hatred for blacks, "liberal" media, and religion. |
|
|
| (482870) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by BMT Guy on Fri Aug 7 01:13:22 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by Andrew Kirschner on Thu Aug 6 12:11:43 2009. Yeah, and more likely than not -- since he frequented the co-ed gym -- maybe his problem was akin to B.O.....maybe a deodorant was in order and that was his problem with woman? Food for thought... |
|
|
| (482873) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Aug 7 01:26:15 2009, in response to Rejection by women = massacre, posted by Peter Rosa on Wed Aug 5 09:55:16 2009. |
|
|
| (482965) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Aug 7 12:40:34 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by BMT Guy on Fri Aug 7 01:13:22 2009. maybe his problem was akin to B.O.The president? What's he got to do with this . . . ? |
|
|
| (482971) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Peter Rosa on Fri Aug 7 13:20:48 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by Andrew Kirschner on Thu Aug 6 12:11:43 2009. Yeah, while I can feel a twinge of sympathy for his frustration, nonetheless we should call a spade a spade. This absoultely is misogyny, and it is pathological--more than that in fact, it's a destructive pathology in our entire culture. You can't blame womankind for a man not getting any. Fellas, get a grip!One idea making its way around the blogosphere is that at least in recent years, Sodini was too obsessed with chasing after young women. He would've had far more success if he had sought out women in their 30's. He was in excellent physical condition for age 48 and reasonably well-off financially. While that doesn't mean that he would have much luck with college cheerleaders, if he had tried to meet 30-something women he'd probably be getting all the tail he could manage. My LIRR/NYCT blog |
|
|
| (482984) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Aug 7 14:01:30 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by Union Turnpike on Thu Aug 6 18:56:50 2009. That's how deep his misogyny ran. |
|
|
| (482987) | |
Re: Most definitely Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Aug 7 14:11:46 2009, in response to Re: Rejection (not Misogyny) = massacre, posted by R36 #9346 on Thu Aug 6 09:16:23 2009. Where do you see misogyny?Stuff like this, where he dehumanizes women . . . ? Many of the young girls here look so beautiful as to not be human, very edible . . .Read the highlighted words here: I was reading several posts on different forums and it seems many teenage girls have sex frequently. One 16 year old does it usually three times a day with her boyfriend. So, err, after a month of that, this little hoe (sic) has had more sex than ME in my LIFE, and I am 48. One more reason. Thanks for nada, bitches! Bye.This shows that the problem was with him . . . he automatically presumed that people wouldn't want to be friends with him (never mind women), but note that he says that the unfriendliness is at first on his part (so there's not only misogyny, but general misanthropy): I like to write and talk. Ironic because I haven't met anybody recently (past 30 years) who I want to be close friends with OR who want to be close friends with me . . .His misogyny was so overwhelming, he even saw the daughter of an acquaintance as a "little ho(e)", completely objectifying a person he never knew: Andy has a young daughter Bethany Pulkowski away at college, High Point University. I saw her picture on his desk. She's your basic, attractive, young girl. Please reread my entry made on Nov 5th. That's only one thing she can do. You Andy types out there need to further strengthen your strict resolve and do more of the same thing! Because those girls were great when I recall my college years! She is someone's (or many guy's) little hoe now, I am sure . . . |
|
|
| (482997) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Kevin from Midwood on Fri Aug 7 14:44:10 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by Peter Rosa on Wed Aug 5 21:50:24 2009. He was a kook back then too. |
|
|
| (482999) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Aug 7 14:51:35 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by Kevin from Midwood on Fri Aug 7 14:44:10 2009. That clinches that. |
|
|
| (483026) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by BMT Guy on Fri Aug 7 15:51:25 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Aug 7 12:40:34 2009. How did Barack How's Sane O'bama get all mixed up in this fine mess??? ;-) |
|
|
| (483027) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by BMT Guy on Fri Aug 7 15:52:21 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by BMT Guy on Fri Aug 7 15:51:25 2009. I met to say Barack Who's Sane O'bama...not How's Sane...Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk! |
|
|
| (483091) | |
Re: Rejection by women = massacre |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri Aug 7 20:11:57 2009, in response to Re: Rejection by women = massacre, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Aug 7 01:00:12 2009. According to the left-wing blogs, this guy was a right-wing nut, inspired by hatred for blacks, "liberal" media, and religion.I haven't seen any evidence that this guy's hatred had anything to do with politics or was inspired by any right-wing propaganda. |
|
|
| (483093) | |
Re: Misogyny = massacre |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Aug 7 20:15:01 2009, in response to Re: Misogyny = massacre, posted by BMT Guy on Fri Aug 7 15:52:21 2009. You mentioned his initials. |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||