| Re: Accident (403424) | |
|
|
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 8 |
||
| (403615) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 15 19:47:35 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 15 19:42:46 2009. So if a Regional train derails on the NEC tomorrow, will you still take the train? |
|
| (403616) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Jan 15 19:48:04 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 15 19:46:54 2009. Wires? Like the chicken wire idea? The reasons why that won't work have been discussed. |
|
| (403617) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 15 19:48:27 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 15 19:46:54 2009. It's unworkable, because it would eventually accumulate too much debris and choke the intakes. |
|
| (403618) | |
Re: Six Minutes (was:Re: Accident) |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Jan 15 19:49:30 2009, in response to Six Minutes (was:Re: Accident), posted by WillD on Thu Jan 15 17:42:53 2009. Since the plane was salvaged do the ferry companies get to keep it? |
|
| (403619) | |
Re: Six Minutes (was:Re: Accident) |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 15 19:51:47 2009, in response to Re: Six Minutes (was:Re: Accident), posted by Easy on Thu Jan 15 19:49:30 2009. It would be nice if they could claim Right Of Salvage. NY Waterway in particular needs the money. But the plane belongs to the NTSB until the investigation is over, then US Airways will sell the plane to the insurance company. |
|
| (403620) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Jan 15 19:52:28 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 15 19:46:54 2009. We should genetically engineer the Canadian geese so that they become one tenth their current size. |
|
| (403621) | |
Re: Six Minutes (was:Re: Accident) |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 15 19:56:08 2009, in response to Re: Six Minutes (was:Re: Accident), posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 15 19:51:47 2009. As for the pilot and future pilots, this will probably end up being a study in crew resource management just as United 232 is today. |
|
| (403622) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by DaRidgewoodBusbuff on Thu Jan 15 20:15:59 2009, in response to Accident, posted by cortelyounext on Thu Jan 15 15:46:24 2009. Everyone made a safe recovery for the most part. I'd say the pilot did a smart thing in that type of situation where landing anywhere else would've resulted in death. The crash was close enough for rescuers to save everyone in time.Heh coming from La Guardia. Rank one of the worst airports. LMAO. |
|
| (403623) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 15 20:21:00 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by DaRidgewoodBusbuff on Thu Jan 15 20:15:59 2009. LMAO? |
|
| (403624) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 15 20:25:48 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by DaRidgewoodBusbuff on Thu Jan 15 20:15:59 2009. This kind of landing is extremely risky; this may be the first time such attempt was made without the loss of a single life. |
|
| (403625) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 15 20:26:16 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 15 20:25:48 2009. Specifically, this would be for an underwing jet plane. |
|
| (403626) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by DaRidgewoodBusbuff on Thu Jan 15 20:27:25 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 15 20:21:00 2009. They did some ranking of US airports some time ago on overall performance and La Guardia rank one of the lowest. Kind of funny of all places it would be in this airport. |
|
| (403627) | |
Re: US Airways Accident (crashed in Hudson River) |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Thu Jan 15 20:34:32 2009, in response to Re: US Airways Accident (crashed in Hudson River), posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 15 17:44:42 2009. Yup. |
|
| (403628) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by mac5689 on Thu Jan 15 20:39:07 2009, in response to Accident, posted by cortelyounext on Thu Jan 15 15:46:24 2009. idk how many know it, but the NYPD was so surprised by the crash that they thought it was a scene for a movie, and called it that over their radios |
|
| (403629) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Thu Jan 15 20:44:26 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 15 17:06:49 2009. Some low life NYC piece of garbage gets impatient behind me, so he goes in the right lane, blows the red light to turn left, and nearly had a head-on. But that's NY, home of all the low-life, third-world, garbage that does stunts like thisYeah. That stuff only happens in NYC. It never happens in LA or Boston or Atlanta, right? |
|
| (403630) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Thu Jan 15 20:46:03 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by trainsarefun on Thu Jan 15 19:02:09 2009. I despise dynamic pricing. |
|
| (403633) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Jan 15 20:54:30 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by MJF on Thu Jan 15 20:44:26 2009. I've never seen that happen in LA. Or anything even similar.But today I was on Goldenwest in Huntington Beach and there was a very elderly woman that had gotten confused and was parked in the middle of three lanes at a red light, but on the wrong side of the road. The cars directly in front of me stopped and refused to enter the intersection thinking that she would realize her mistake and they would let her make a turn. If there had been a way that I could have driven around them I would have. |
|
| (403635) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 15 20:57:14 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by MJF on Thu Jan 15 20:46:03 2009. I could see the Dog going to dynamic pricing down the line; Megabus works on that idea. |
|
| (403639) | |
Re: GOOD NEWS: FAA reports all passengers/crew safely rescued |
|
|
Posted by ntrainride on Thu Jan 15 21:04:14 2009, in response to Re: GOOD NEWS: FAA reports all passengers/crew safely rescued, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 15 17:21:16 2009. Agreed. Waterways accomplished the marine equivalent of rebuilding the Jersey Central mainline through Bayonne. I've never stopped being amazed at the return of the boats. |
|
| (403640) | |
Dynamic Pricing...was Accident |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Thu Jan 15 21:10:43 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Jan 15 20:57:14 2009. The San Francisco Giants are going to try Dynamic pricing for some games in 2009.http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/60741 I would hate to find out that I paid $75 for a coach seat to someplace when a day earlier I could have paid $50. |
|
| (403641) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 15 21:25:23 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 15 17:06:49 2009. No, I'm right. Driving is similarly dangerous as flying. You won't admit that. Your fear of flying, but not of driving, makes your fear of flying irrational. |
|
| (403642) | |
Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 15 21:26:33 2009, in response to Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Jan 15 18:31:20 2009. No, I truly think he's just that stupid. I used to think he was a troll. But trolls are somewhat intelligent. This is guy is just plain stupid. |
|
| (403643) | |
Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 15 21:27:06 2009, in response to Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident, posted by AlM on Thu Jan 15 18:27:32 2009. :::Crickets::: |
|
| (403645) | |
Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by JohnnyMints on Thu Jan 15 21:30:56 2009, in response to Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 15 18:19:19 2009. Do they have any sugar-free sweet coated stats? I really should stay away from sugar. What about honey? Any honey-coated stats? Molasses even... maybe sprinkle some nuts on the top... and some fudge. |
|
| (403650) | |
Re: Missed GWB by 900 Ft US Airways Accident (crashed in Hudson River) |
|
|
Posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 15 21:59:55 2009, in response to Re: US Airways Accident (crashed in Hudson River), posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 15 15:54:52 2009. I dont know if anybody is aware of this but..Heard on Larry King that the plane missed the George Washington Bridge by 900 feet.. Wow just wow... Kudos to the Pilots.. |
|
| (403651) | |
Re: Missed GWB by 900 Ft US Airways Accident (crashed in Hudson River) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 15 22:01:12 2009, in response to Re: Missed GWB by 900 Ft US Airways Accident (crashed in Hudson River), posted by Railman718 on Thu Jan 15 21:59:55 2009. Yeah.Air traffic controllers at LaGuardia saw the plane clear the George Washington Bridge by less than 900 feet before gliding into the water about 3:31 p.m., an aviation source told CNN. |
|
| (403653) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Jan 15 22:10:58 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by MJF on Thu Jan 15 20:44:26 2009. It ain't just NYC, it's EVERYWHERE. Last week, in the Charm City of the Chesapeake Drainage Area, Baltimore, no less than three idiots behind the wheel cut me off, one making a left turn from the right lane of a three lane road with standing traffic. Good thing I have good reflexes and good brakes.Run streetcars for 40 years, you develop a "sixth sense" about drivers on the road with you, since you can't exactly swerve out of their way. |
|
| (403654) | |
Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by jimmymc25 on Thu Jan 15 22:11:54 2009, in response to Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Jan 15 18:11:02 2009. Who needs numbers, though I admit they can be interesting. Bottom line is when your #'s up it's up & off ya go. The Universe/God or whatever knows where to find you. No padded cell with purified air is gonna save you when it's your time....so it's up to us folks to live life to the fullest while we're here!!Jimmymc25 |
|
| (403655) | |
Re: Missed GWB by 900 Ft US Airways Accident (crashed in Hudson River) |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Jan 15 22:13:13 2009, in response to Re: Missed GWB by 900 Ft US Airways Accident (crashed in Hudson River), posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 15 22:01:12 2009. It sounds close, but I would imagine that the pilot took that into account when he made his decision on how to approach his landing. It's not quite like he "randomly" happened to miss it. He missed it on purpose. |
|
| (403656) | |
Re: Missed GWB by 900 Ft US Airways Accident (crashed in Hudson River) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 15 22:15:20 2009, in response to Re: Missed GWB by 900 Ft US Airways Accident (crashed in Hudson River), posted by Easy on Thu Jan 15 22:13:13 2009. I totally agree. |
|
| (403659) | |
Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Thu Jan 15 22:21:24 2009, in response to Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jan 15 21:26:33 2009. But trolls are somewhat intelligent..Can we make one exception to the troll group? |
|
| (403660) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by jimmymc25 on Thu Jan 15 22:21:55 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 15 17:34:55 2009. Actually...I'm wondering how they're gonna get that sucker out of there.Jimmymc25 |
|
| (403661) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by jimmymc25 on Thu Jan 15 22:26:02 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Jan 15 17:30:02 2009. Nah....someone will get hold of it and sell it's parts on e-bay...okay...maybe not.But it won't fly again. Jimmymc25 |
|
| (403662) | |
Re: REEF the crashed's airplane? |
|
|
Posted by R33/R36 mainline on Thu Jan 15 22:26:32 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 15 17:26:53 2009. Its already in the water, why not reef it? Instead of taking it out of the water to be scrapped. |
|
| (403665) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 15 22:38:36 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by jimmymc25 on Thu Jan 15 22:21:55 2009. Probably a Weeks barge crane, like the one used by the Barge Of Death to send the old SMEE cars to Davy Jones' Locker. |
|
| (403666) | |
Re: REEF the crashed's airplane? |
|
|
Posted by BMTLines on Thu Jan 15 22:41:30 2009, in response to Re: REEF the crashed's airplane?, posted by R33/R36 mainline on Thu Jan 15 22:26:32 2009. Its already in the water, why not reef it? Instead of taking it out of the water to be scrapped.I am sure the NTSB will want to examine the engines to find out exactly what happened. Then there is the matter of the those who own it or the insurance company involved - I am sure they want to recover something even if it is just the scrap value. |
|
| (403667) | |
Re: REEF the crashed's airplane? |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 15 22:41:35 2009, in response to Re: REEF the crashed's airplane?, posted by R33/R36 mainline on Thu Jan 15 22:26:32 2009. Serious environmental issues, like thousands of gallons of jet fuel (which is lighter than water) rising to the surface. Also, the NTSB will most definitely need the airframe for its investigation. Until the investigation is completed, not even US Airways can get its hands on that plane. |
|
| (403668) | |
Re: Accident (By the numbers) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Jan 15 22:52:09 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by WillD on Thu Jan 15 17:52:57 2009. Actually, there is a stat for airline accident deaths per million passenger miles flown. The last number I can find is .0031 (2005). Hence, each successive flight without a fatal accident, raises the liklihood that there will be a fatal airline accident. Live by stats, die by stats |
|
| (403669) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 15 22:55:07 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by WillD on Thu Jan 15 17:52:57 2009. It's also possible to avoid flying and die on the ground when a falling airplane drops in on you...you're right, the Grim Reaper never misses an appointment. |
|
| (403670) | |
Re: Accident (By the numbers) |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Jan 15 23:02:43 2009, in response to Re: Accident (By the numbers), posted by Train Dude on Thu Jan 15 22:52:09 2009. I don't think that's how statistics work. For example if you flip a quarter and get tails 9 times in a row, isn't the probability that your next flip will be heads still 50%?But in this discussion the more miles flown without an accident might show that safety measures, equipment, training, etc might be getting better. That would reduce the odds of a crash as the amount of accident free miles increase. |
|
| (403673) | |
Re: GOOD NEWS: FAA reports all passengers/crew safely rescued |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 15 23:20:38 2009, in response to Re: GOOD NEWS: FAA reports all passengers/crew safely rescued, posted by ntrainride on Thu Jan 15 21:04:14 2009. Waterways accomplished the marine equivalent of rebuilding the Jersey Central mainline through Bayonne.Agreed, but it would be nicer if people in Jersey appreciated it more, and NY Waterway starting going to Hoboken Terminal and Paulus Hook on weekends again. |
|
| (403674) | |
Re: GOOD NEWS: FAA reports all passengers/crew safely rescued |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 15 23:22:00 2009, in response to Re: GOOD NEWS: FAA reports all passengers/crew safely rescued, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 15 17:21:16 2009. According to what I saw on the news, NY Waterway's Yogi Berra, Admiral Richard E. Bennis, Henry Hudson, Moira Smith, Columbus Columbus, Athena, and two other vessels I couldn't see the name of all helped evacuate the passengers. |
|
| (403676) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Thu Jan 15 23:36:26 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Jan 15 18:45:52 2009. I don't know who wonders that.Certainly none of the people who cant get on the train because it is sold out... |
|
| (403677) | |
Re: Accident (By the numbers) |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Fri Jan 16 00:07:15 2009, in response to Re: Accident (By the numbers), posted by Train Dude on Thu Jan 15 22:52:09 2009. You obviously don't understand stats. |
|
| (403684) | |
Re: REEF the crashed's airplane? |
|
|
Posted by Mr Mabstoa on Fri Jan 16 01:30:25 2009, in response to Re: REEF the crashed's airplane?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Jan 15 22:41:35 2009. Also the pillows and seat cushions that smell of beer farts must be removed. That alone would destroy the fragile water creatures or whatever. |
|
| (403686) | |
Re: REEF the crashed's airplane? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Jan 16 01:35:43 2009, in response to Re: REEF the crashed's airplane?, posted by Mr Mabstoa on Fri Jan 16 01:30:25 2009. I'm no expert but when a plan ditches like that, it's gonna be more than just a fart. I can't prove that though.your pal, Fred |
|
| (403708) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Fri Jan 16 05:47:38 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by Easy on Thu Jan 15 19:05:22 2009. They said that the other problem would be gathering debris that would prevent the flow of air through the turbineBingo!. |
|
| (403709) | |
Re: GOOD NEWS: FAA reports all passengers/crew safely rescued |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Fri Jan 16 07:02:43 2009, in response to Re: GOOD NEWS: FAA reports all passengers/crew safely rescued, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Jan 15 23:22:00 2009. Add the Governor Thomas H. Kean to that list. |
|
| (403710) | |
Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Fri Jan 16 07:04:39 2009, in response to Re: Will D. = Aviation TROLL! Re: Accident, posted by AlM on Thu Jan 15 18:40:55 2009. LOL He doesn't need psychotherapy! |
|
| (403711) | |
Re: Accident |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Fri Jan 16 07:05:45 2009, in response to Re: Accident, posted by Easy on Thu Jan 15 19:05:22 2009. It would need to be on a conical frame. |
|
|
Page 4 of 8 |
||