|
|
| Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam (399820) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
| (399820) | |
Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jan 4 21:21:06 2009 But Tom Cruise's wife could get $2,500 an hour.A-list ratings |
|
|
| (399916) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by R PansePCC on Mon Jan 5 06:29:44 2009, in response to Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jan 4 21:21:06 2009. If Palin was deemed inexpensive maybe some of the OTchatters that need a girlfriend could afford her :) |
|
|
| (399938) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 5 07:11:02 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by R PansePCC on Mon Jan 5 06:29:44 2009. Yes, but it's the OTChatters on the left that can't let her go. It's only people from the left that begin any thread with the word "Palin" in it (case in point, this thread), or bring her up in posts).The left is OBSESSED with her. The election is over. She lost. They all need to get over her, but they can't. |
|
|
| (399946) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Mon Jan 5 07:58:34 2009, in response to Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jan 4 21:21:06 2009. I'd take Palin over Holmes any day of the week. |
|
|
| (399953) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Mon Jan 5 08:30:33 2009, in response to Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jan 4 21:21:06 2009. WHAT THE F? That was absolutely UNCALLED for...and by that, I mean what is in the link. |
|
|
| (399957) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jan 5 08:41:27 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 5 07:11:02 2009. Daily Snooze has gone straight to hell. Wonder when they're going to start featuring "Page 3 models" . . . ?? |
|
|
| (399959) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jan 5 08:58:27 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by R PansePCC on Mon Jan 5 06:29:44 2009. Still can't get over her? |
|
|
| (399971) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 5 11:04:05 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by AMoreira81 on Mon Jan 5 08:30:33 2009. It's the dumbest article I have ever seen. |
|
|
| (399984) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by R PansePCC on Mon Jan 5 11:31:15 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jan 5 08:58:27 2009. I didn't start this thread. I just made a wise ass comment. |
|
|
| (399989) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Mon Jan 5 11:55:24 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Mitch45 on Mon Jan 5 07:58:34 2009. OK. And she'd actually be affordable. |
|
|
| (399990) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Mon Jan 5 11:55:38 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by AMoreira81 on Mon Jan 5 08:30:33 2009. Why? |
|
|
| (399992) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Mon Jan 5 12:18:03 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by RonInBayside on Mon Jan 5 11:55:24 2009. Even better!And for the record, she is much better looking than the vastly overrated Tina Feh, er, Fey. |
|
|
| (399994) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 5 12:31:37 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 5 07:11:02 2009. The left is OBSESSED with her.There does seem to be a bit of an obsession. On the other hand, former VP candidates take quite a while to stop being news. Geraldine Ferraro and Jack Kemp (to a lesser degree) remained newsworthy for quite a few years, and Joe Lieberman and John Edwards remain newsworthy even now. |
|
|
| (399995) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Mon Jan 5 12:42:35 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 5 07:11:02 2009. The election is over. She lost. They all need to get over her, but they can't.Why? She at least did something noteworthy. I'd be more worried about obsessions with non-entities such as Paris Hilton and Prince Harry. |
|
|
| (399996) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Mon Jan 5 12:44:24 2009, in response to Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jan 4 21:21:06 2009. But Tom Cruise's wife could get $2,500 an hour.His ex-wife's hotter. |
|
|
| (399999) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Mon Jan 5 12:50:12 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Mon Jan 5 12:42:35 2009. Good point! |
|
|
| (400009) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 5 13:08:06 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by AlM on Mon Jan 5 12:31:37 2009. Geraldine Ferraro was a local politician, so she was always in the news.Also, Senators are in the news too. I don't even remember who John Edwards ran with if that says anything about how memorable most lost VP candidates are. |
|
|
| (400010) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 5 13:09:15 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Mon Jan 5 12:42:35 2009. Paris Hilton is a national celebrity, and Prince Harry is a part of Britain's Royal Family. Of course they will be in the news. Prince Harry more so for you probably, although he does occasionally come up here too. |
|
|
| (400017) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by R PansePCC on Mon Jan 5 13:23:48 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Mon Jan 5 12:44:24 2009. Yes she is. |
|
|
| (400021) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by R PansePCC on Mon Jan 5 13:30:08 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 5 07:11:02 2009. If these Palin females keep multiplying like rabbits they will eventually have to name one of their little boys Train or Trolley. As much as I am obsessed with the day to day (lefty) :) media reports about them, the Palins seem to be obsessed with boys names that begin with "TR". Is anyone else out there obsessed about their "TR" obsession, or is it just me? :) LOL. |
|
|
| (400044) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 5 14:32:50 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by R PansePCC on Mon Jan 5 13:30:08 2009. Well, I agree the names are WAY out there. |
|
|
| (400062) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by R PansePCC on Mon Jan 5 16:00:29 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 5 14:32:50 2009. I was just wondering if the kids could be baptized in a Catholic Church? I remember a few years ago that a priest refused to use a child's real name and used another one for the baptism. I think it was mentioned that the child had to have the name of a Saint, and the priest substituted and used a Saint's name. |
|
|
| (400063) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 5 16:19:17 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by R PansePCC on Mon Jan 5 16:00:29 2009. I was just wondering if the kids could be baptized in a Catholic Church? I remember a few years ago that a priest refused to use a child's real name and used another one for the baptism. I think it was mentioned that the child had to have the name of a Saint, and the priest substituted and used a Saint's name.I don't think the Catholic Church takes that issue so seriously any more. A classical example was Amy (there is no Saint Amy - it comes from the French Aimee). But I think priests have been baptizing lots of Amys for quite a few years now. |
|
|
| (400064) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Mon Jan 5 16:21:18 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by AlM on Mon Jan 5 16:19:17 2009. Amy is sometimes short for Amelia, is it not? |
|
|
| (400117) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Mon Jan 5 20:30:26 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by R PansePCC on Mon Jan 5 13:30:08 2009. Those Palin kids in full (after a copy of the OED was received as a christening present):Trabant Trachle Trachodon Traction-Engine Tractor-Trailer Trade-In Traffic-Circle Tragelaph Traheen Trahison-Des-Clercs Trailbaston Trajectile Trakehner Tramway Trance-Dancer Transaccidentation Transleithan Transom Transpenetrable Transrational Transreal Trans-Siberian Trans-Village Trantles Trashtrie Traskite Travado Travelogue Travestiment Travisher Travolator Trayne Continued on page 94. |
|
|
| (400129) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 5 21:09:44 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Mon Jan 5 20:30:26 2009. I nominate Trabajo but that won't ever happen :Dyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (400222) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Jan 6 02:09:51 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Mon Jan 5 12:42:35 2009. I'd be more worried about obsessions with non-entities such as Paris Hilton and Prince Harry.Paris Hilton had a better energy plan then McCain/Palin |
|
|
| (400223) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Jan 6 02:12:24 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by R PansePCC on Mon Jan 5 16:00:29 2009. I don't know if they still do that. Back in 1970 my uncle and aunt had to give my cousin the middle name of a Saint's or she wouldn't have been baptized. |
|
|
| (400226) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Jan 6 02:18:49 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Mitch45 on Mon Jan 5 12:18:03 2009. I think that the younger Palin was better looking then the younger Fey but not nowadays. Sarah is several years older then Tina and it shows. |
|
|
| (400227) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Jan 6 02:20:14 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Mon Jan 5 12:44:24 2009. Absolutely. |
|
|
| (400228) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Tue Jan 6 02:23:18 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 5 21:09:44 2009. LOL!Great list. |
|
|
| (400314) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 6 07:57:52 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by SMAZ on Tue Jan 6 02:12:24 2009. I also don't believe that is still the case. |
|
|
| (400374) | |
Re: Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jan 6 14:49:35 2009, in response to Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jan 4 21:21:06 2009. This is what the flesh-peddler in question looks like. |
|
|
| (400378) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jan 6 14:53:46 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Mon Jan 5 12:44:24 2009. Which one?  |
|
|
| (400388) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Tue Jan 6 15:35:08 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jan 6 14:53:46 2009. He keeps trading up to new models. |
|
|
| (400389) | |
Re: Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Tue Jan 6 15:35:47 2009, in response to Re: Manhattan madam, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jan 6 14:49:35 2009. Yeah. Not my type personally... |
|
|
| (400398) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Mitch45 on Tue Jan 6 15:52:36 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jan 6 14:53:46 2009. Mimi Rogers is smokin' hot. |
|
|
| (400410) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Tue Jan 6 16:48:29 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jan 6 14:53:46 2009. Definitely Nicole.
|
|
|
| (400452) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by R143 on Tue Jan 6 19:27:58 2009, in response to Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by RonInBayside on Sun Jan 4 21:21:06 2009. Why would someone even post such rubbish? |
|
|
| (400473) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jan 6 20:04:31 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by AlM on Mon Jan 5 12:31:37 2009. Yes, newsworthy. That means they make news, it's reported. The obsession with Palin is entirely demeaning in nature, and unusual given that her ticket lost the election and now she's returned to being a low-profile governor. |
|
|
| (400497) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Tue Jan 6 20:37:59 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Jan 6 20:04:31 2009. LOL |
|
|
| (400500) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Tue Jan 6 20:42:47 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 5 13:09:15 2009. And Palin is a governor, one of just fifty people in the country in the same position. Are you trying to say her position does not lend her some sort of notoriety?Also, what about the continual ribbing from the right Al Gore and Hillary Clinton took after 2000? Did either person have the same notoriety Mrs. Palin has created for herself? The amusing thing is that by keeping his name in people's heads the Right actually helped Mr. Gore in his production of 'An Inconvenient Truth' and Mrs Clinton's bid for the presidency. |
|
|
| (400507) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Tue Jan 6 20:48:53 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by WillD on Tue Jan 6 20:42:47 2009. Yeah but this isn't even Palin. This is Palin's possible son-in-law. (I haven't been following it but I gather that her daughter and the boy aren't married?).If/when Bristol Palin and her significant other go into politics, I think that they're fair game. But not until then. When McCain told a joke about a tween Chelsea Clinton that she's so ugly because her real father is Janet reno, I thought that was low. This sort of coverage of Palin's relations and possible relations strikes me a similarly low. |
|
|
| (400565) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jan 6 22:45:11 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by WillD on Tue Jan 6 20:42:47 2009. First, what does this have to do with Palin? This is some lunatic saying that Palin would be behind as a call girl. What is that? What are you defending here?Second, yes, she is a governor that ran for VP . Great, she lost. Let her go back to being governor. Notoriety? LOL. Some people can't even name the governor of their own state, much less the governor of 5 other states. (Arnold, not withstanding). Third, Al Gore? Hillary Clinton? Uhm, last I checked, he actually WAS a Vice President, and Hillary, the First Lady. When has Palin did either? And as for Al Gore's "notoriety" outside of being VP, he kept HIMSELF in the spotlight with his global warming stuff. |
|
|
| (400852) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 8 01:39:29 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Tue Jan 6 16:48:29 2009. Come on, no NSFW stuff without a warning. |
|
|
| (400856) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Jan 8 03:16:58 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jan 6 14:53:46 2009. The red. |
|
|
| (400857) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Jan 8 03:17:58 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by RonInBayside on Tue Jan 6 15:35:08 2009. I think Nicole still looks better then Katie even now. Not that I would toss Katie out of my bed mind you. |
|
|
| (400923) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Thu Jan 8 10:26:12 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 8 01:39:29 2009. Didn't realize you worked for fascists. |
|
|
| (400925) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 8 10:34:51 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Thu Jan 8 10:26:12 2009. No, but anyone in the EU does. |
|
|
| (400926) | |
Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jan 8 10:35:59 2009, in response to Re: Palin not a good call girl, says Manhattan madam, posted by SMAZ on Thu Jan 8 03:16:58 2009. Don't think either one's a commie . . . |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|