|
|
| Re: why are there no thriving ''sub-saharan'' black nations? (1423507) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||
|
| (1423870) | |
Re: why are there no thriving ''sub-saharan'' black nations? |
|
|
Posted by ntrainride on Sun Mar 12 04:40:30 2017, in response to Re: why are there no thriving ''sub-saharan'' black nations?, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 12 01:11:48 2017. i meant, nobody from around the world ever thinks about moving to africa. that's amazing. though nobody ever thinks about moving to china, russia, central america, india/pakistan, the middle east (excepting israel), or eastern europe either.the united states, canada, western europe, australia. that's it. |
|
|
| (1423875) | |
Re: why are there no thriving ''sub-saharan'' black nations? |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 12 05:52:00 2017, in response to Re: why are there no thriving ''sub-saharan'' black nations?, posted by ntrainride on Sun Mar 12 04:40:30 2017. People also move to Japan. Just sayin'. People don't move to the other places you mentioned because they are shitholes! |
|
|
| (1423917) | |
Re: why are there no thriving ''sub-saharan'' black nations? |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Sun Mar 12 11:01:35 2017, in response to why are there no thriving "sub-saharan" black nations?, posted by ntrainride on Sat Mar 11 02:59:24 2017. According to the internet, it's the white europeans who stole all their rubies and diamonds.And I'm not making it up. That's probably why, the crazy excuses. |
|
|
| (2015359) | |
Re: Why are there no thriving “sub-Saharan” African nations? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed May 7 01:48:27 2025, in response to Re: why are there no thriving ''sub-saharan'' black nations?, posted by AlM on Sat Mar 11 12:54:15 2017. the trans-Atlantic slave trade was far more brutal than anything that happened to slaves within AfricaYou were there? |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||