$83 million

$83 million (1978671)	Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7]

Page 1 of 7

Next Page >

(1978671)	view threaded
$83 million
Posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 18:38:35 2024 It's a start. Consult your favorite news source.
Post a New Response

(1978673)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim* on Fri Jan 26 18:42:53 2024, in response to $83 million, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 18:38:35 2024.* I heard. I was watching Lester Holt reporting the story with seemingly orgasmic excitement. Ill assume with the appeal process it will be years before any $$$ will be exchanged
Post a New Response

(1978674)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Fri Jan 26 18:47:15 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Jan 26 18:42:53 2024.* Appeals don’t automatically stay the obligation to pay a judgment.
Post a New Response

(1978676)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim* on Fri Jan 26 19:15:22 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jan 26 18:47:15 2024.* He has 30 days to file an appeal AFAIK
Post a New Response

(1978678)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Fri Jan 26 19:16:55 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Jan 26 19:15:22 2024.* Right. But that’s not going to stay enforcement.
Post a New Response

(1978679)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by LuchAAA* on Fri Jan 26 19:20:09 2024, in response to $83 million, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 18:38:35 2024.* Everything I predicted is coming true. Sad.
Post a New Response

(1978680)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Fri Jan 26 19:22:34 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 26 19:20:09 2024.* Nothing you predicted is coming true.
Post a New Response

(1978681)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by AlM* on Fri Jan 26 19:22:47 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Jan 26 18:42:53 2024.* He has to post a bond of $83 million in order to even file an appeal.
Post a New Response

(1978682)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim* on Fri Jan 26 19:30:51 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 19:22:47 2024.* If thats the case and if hes worth $2BIL, that would come out of petty cash
Post a New Response

(1978683)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Fri Jan 26 19:33:54 2024, in response to $83 million, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 18:38:35 2024.* Did you climax on yourself?
Post a New Response

(1978684)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Fri Jan 26 19:34:48 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Jan 26 18:42:53 2024.* You watch Lester Holt?
Post a New Response

(1978685)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by AlM* on Fri Jan 26 19:35:52 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Jan 26 19:30:51 2024.* Of course.
Post a New Response

(1978686)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by AlM* on Fri Jan 26 19:36:08 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Chicagomotorman on Fri Jan 26 19:33:54 2024.* No.
Post a New Response

(1978687)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Fri Jan 26 19:36:22 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jan 26 18:47:15 2024.* Did you climax on yourself?
Post a New Response

(1978688)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Fri Jan 26 19:36:58 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Jan 26 19:30:51 2024.* People who are that rich borrow everything.
Post a New Response

(1978689)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Fri Jan 26 19:36:59 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 26 19:20:09 2024.* Very sad.
Post a New Response

(1978690)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by bingbong* on Fri Jan 26 19:37:03 2024, in response to $83 million, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 18:38:35 2024.* Hopefully enough to get his attention.
Post a New Response

(1978691)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Fri Jan 26 19:37:48 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by bingbong on Fri Jan 26 19:37:03 2024.* Are you moist?
Post a New Response

(1978692)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim* on Fri Jan 26 19:38:21 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Chicagomotorman on Fri Jan 26 19:34:48 2024.* Tonight I did.
Post a New Response

(1978693)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by bingbong* on Fri Jan 26 19:38:37 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Chicagomotorman on Fri Jan 26 19:37:48 2024.* No.
Post a New Response

(1978694)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Fri Jan 26 19:42:04 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Chicagomotorman on Fri Jan 26 19:36:22 2024.* Not since the verdict.
Post a New Response

(1978696)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by LuchAAA* on Fri Jan 26 19:43:56 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 19:22:47 2024.* You didn't thread about a man attacked at a church on 14th Street. Anyway it's election year. They're going after Trump.
Post a New Response

(1978698)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by chicagoMotorman* on Fri Jan 26 19:50:03 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by bingbong on Fri Jan 26 19:38:37 2024.* LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post a New Response

(1978699)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by chicagoMotorman* on Fri Jan 26 19:50:36 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jan 26 19:42:04 2024.* FIGURES
Post a New Response

(1978701)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by AlM* on Fri Jan 26 20:11:35 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jan 26 19:36:58 2024.* Banks may not be willing to extend him further credit since his actual net worth is so murky. Sure he has a ton of assets, but his liabilities are completely unknown.
Post a New Response

(1978702)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by AlM* on Fri Jan 26 20:13:11 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 26 19:43:56 2024.* You are right. And as you ought to know, that is my church, even though I don't live in Stuyvesant Town.
Post a New Response

(1978703)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Olog-hai* on Fri Jan 26 20:14:04 2024, in response to $83 million, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 18:38:35 2024.* Start of what? If not to investigate jury tampering, then it's just a continuation of NY being a banana republic.
Post a New Response

(1978705)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by LuchAAA* on Fri Jan 26 20:48:47 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jan 26 19:22:34 2024.* Sadly you're wrong.
Post a New Response

(1978706)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Train Dude* on Fri Jan 26 20:58:28 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Chicagomotorman on Fri Jan 26 19:37:48 2024.* LOL
Post a New Response

(1978713)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Fri Jan 26 21:43:40 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by chicagoMotorman on Fri Jan 26 19:50:36 2024.* WHAT?‽?!?
Post a New Response

(1978715)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Fri Jan 26 21:45:06 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 20:11:35 2024.* We’ll see.
Post a New Response

(1978716)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Fri Jan 26 21:45:55 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 26 20:14:04 2024.* This is a FEDERAL court, dumbass.
Post a New Response

(1978717)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Fri Jan 26 21:47:18 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Jan 26 20:48:47 2024.* How do you figure?
Post a New Response

(1978765)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by 3-9* on Sat Jan 27 11:38:54 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jan 26 19:36:58 2024.* I heard that his credit sucks so bad, no US bank will touch him.
Post a New Response

(1978767)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Sat Jan 27 11:51:38 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by 3-9 on Sat Jan 27 11:38:54 2024.* That may now be true because I heard he deposited the bond in cash rather than borrowing.
Post a New Response

(1978768)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by AlM* on Sat Jan 27 11:53:57 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 27 11:51:38 2024.* I'm mildly surprised that he could come up with that much cash. But I don't closely follow his finances.
Post a New Response

(1978769)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by 3-9* on Sat Jan 27 12:16:00 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Sat Jan 27 11:53:57 2024.* Maybe his superPAC helped. :-S
Post a New Response

(1978777)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by DaNd124* on Sat Jan 27 14:47:39 2024, in response to $83 million, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 18:38:35 2024.* When will Juanita Broaddrick be able to file a similar lawsuit?
Post a New Response

(1978779)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Sat Jan 27 14:55:30 2024, in response to $83 million, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 26 18:38:35 2024.* WILL TRUMP PAY THIS DO EVERYTHING TO STALL AND GET OUT OF IT TYPICAL WHITE MALE
Post a New Response

(1978784)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by chicagoMotorman* on Sat Jan 27 15:31:23 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Sat Jan 27 14:55:30 2024.* Typical Salaam Allah racist post.
Post a New Response

(1978785)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by AlM* on Sat Jan 27 15:31:46 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by DaNd124 on Sat Jan 27 14:47:39 2024.* Huh? When has Bill Clinton ever said anything to defame her? Even this is from his lawyer, not him: "Any allegation that the president assaulted Mrs. Broaddrick more than 20 years ago is absolutely false. Beyond that, we're not going to comment." Compare to "liar," "whack job," and whatever else.
Post a New Response

(1978790)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by DaNd124* on Sat Jan 27 15:41:09 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by AlM on Sat Jan 27 15:31:46 2024.* If you say someones statements are false you are implicitly calling them a liar. At any rate the sexual assault itself seems worse than the defamation.
Post a New Response

(1978793)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Sat Jan 27 15:50:00 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by chicagoMotorman on Sat Jan 27 15:31:23 2024.* TYPICAL HATE FROM YOU YOU KNOW TRUMP WILL GET AWAY WITH IT
Post a New Response

(1978795)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by chicagoMotorman* on Sat Jan 27 15:54:00 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Sat Jan 27 15:50:00 2024.* As he should.
Post a New Response

(1978796)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Sat Jan 27 15:58:33 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by chicagoMotorman on Sat Jan 27 15:54:00 2024.* UH HUH SEE ?
Post a New Response

(1978797)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Sat Jan 27 16:09:35 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Sat Jan 27 15:58:33 2024.* With my glasses.
Post a New Response

(1978798)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Sat Jan 27 16:11:42 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by DaNd124 on Sat Jan 27 15:41:09 2024.* TNHIW
Post a New Response

(1978799)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by DaNd124* on Sat Jan 27 16:12:38 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 27 16:11:42 2024.* I know that, the law is absurd.
Post a New Response

(1978801)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Sat Jan 27 16:13:35 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by DaNd124 on Sat Jan 27 16:12:38 2024.* No, it’s not.
Post a New Response

(1978802)	view threaded
Re: $83 million
Posted by AlM* on Sat Jan 27 16:15:44 2024, in response to Re: $83 million, posted by DaNd124 on Sat Jan 27 15:41:09 2024.* Obviously Clinton's lawyer felt comfortable that his statement would not be construed as defamation.
Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7]
	Page 1 of 7	Next Page >

[ Return to the Message Index ]