Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai (1931322) | |
![]() |
|
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 3 of 3 |
![]() |
(1931675) | |
Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Mar 30 14:11:20 2023, in response to Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai, posted by AlM on Thu Mar 30 09:51:52 2023. The 2nd Amendment IS absolute. It's like being pregnant. Either you are or you aren't. |
|
![]() |
(1931677) | |
Re: Salaam Allah Does Not Like The Mickey Mouse Club |
|
Posted by chicagoMotorman on Thu Mar 30 14:16:14 2023, in response to Re: Salaam Allah Does Not Like The Mickey Mouse Club, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Thu Mar 30 13:58:52 2023. WHAT ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |
|
![]() |
(1931684) | |
Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai |
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Mar 30 14:29:23 2023, in response to Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Mar 30 14:11:20 2023. The overwhelming majority of the country, in addition to the Supreme Court, disagrees with you.You aren't going to get support for portable anti-tank weapons. |
|
![]() |
(1931690) | |
Re: Salaam Allah Does Not Like The Mickey Mouse Club |
|
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Thu Mar 30 14:47:04 2023, in response to Re: Salaam Allah Does Not Like The Mickey Mouse Club, posted by chicagoMotorman on Thu Mar 30 14:16:14 2023. LOL |
|
![]() |
(1931692) | |
Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai |
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Mar 30 14:48:16 2023, in response to Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai, posted by AlM on Wed Mar 29 15:31:05 2023. So where do you draw the line? |
|
![]() |
(1931693) | |
Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Mar 30 14:53:02 2023, in response to Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai, posted by AlM on Thu Mar 30 14:29:23 2023. "Overwhelming majority" LO@LM!!What is with the anti-tank.weapons/nukes/rockets, etc.. that the lins ALWAYS use as an argument? I don't get it. |
|
![]() |
(1931694) | |
Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Mar 30 14:53:04 2023, in response to Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai, posted by AlM on Thu Mar 30 14:29:23 2023. "Overwhelming majority" LO@LM!!What is with the anti-tank.weapons/nukes/rockets, etc.. that the lins ALWAYS use as an argument? I don't get it. |
|
![]() |
(1931697) | |
Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Mar 30 15:37:40 2023, in response to Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Mar 30 14:53:02 2023. Reductio ad absurdum. |
|
![]() |
(1931702) | |
Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai |
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Mar 30 16:29:02 2023, in response to Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Mar 30 14:53:02 2023. You make an absolute statement. That immediately invites a counter-example. |
|
![]() |
(1931703) | |
Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai |
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Mar 30 16:32:05 2023, in response to Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Mar 30 15:37:40 2023. In mathematics, it isn't even considered that.You say: "A holds." I say: not in the following case. So you are wrong. As long as my example is feasible, it's not considered absurd. And besides, even in general speech, it's not absurd. An insurrectionist very well might consider an anti-tank weapon to be very helpful to his cause. |
|
![]() |
(1931747) | |
Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai |
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Mar 30 19:14:27 2023, in response to Re: I Apologize To Olog-hai, posted by AlM on Thu Mar 30 16:29:02 2023. And where are those silly examples written in any laws? |
|
![]() |
Page 3 of 3 |