|
|
| Re: Nikki Haley (1926013) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 6 |
||
|
| (1926212) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Wed Feb 15 21:03:51 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Feb 15 20:25:35 2023. The people were on board with that. they even wore the armbands. And they weren't socialists but nazis. |
|
|
| (1926214) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Wed Feb 15 21:26:45 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by AlM on Wed Feb 15 15:11:17 2023. Huh? They treated the French under occupation terribly. |
|
|
| (1926215) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Wed Feb 15 21:30:51 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Feb 15 19:17:02 2023. Baloney!! 90% of the Germans were pro nazi. (and for many post war years also) |
|
|
| (1926220) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 00:30:44 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Feb 15 20:25:35 2023. Hitler had his competition killed/thrown in jail, from what I understand. |
|
|
| (1926221) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 00:36:51 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fred G on Wed Feb 15 21:03:51 2023. Nazi literally stands for National Socialist |
|
|
| (1926222) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 00:41:11 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Jeff Rosen on Wed Feb 15 21:30:51 2023. I'm not an authority on the subject, but I always thought the party rose to power by intimidation, killing, imprisoning, disrupting the opposition. I could be wrong. Once in power in the late 1930s, I guess I could see the krauts being enamored with the success of the regime. |
|
|
| (1926224) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 16 01:50:19 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Feb 15 20:25:35 2023. Evan, you people(the Left) will always insert Nazis and the Holocaust into the conversation for the win.That's what Nazis and the Holocaust means to modern leftists. It's just ammunition in an argument about politics. |
|
|
| (1926225) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 02:36:17 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 16 01:50:19 2023. Godwin's Law. |
|
|
| (1926226) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 02:41:36 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 00:41:11 2023. Hitler was voted in. |
|
|
| (1926231) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 03:42:19 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 00:36:51 2023. And yet private industry remained in private hands. That’s not Socialism.Socialism would be like a police department or a subway system that’s owned and controlled by the state |
|
|
| (1926235) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Avid Reader on Thu Feb 16 06:27:24 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Train Dude on Wed Feb 15 16:22:22 2023. Dude, he is an (_!_) , don't waste your time om him. |
|
|
| (1926236) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Avid Reader on Thu Feb 16 06:33:14 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Feb 15 17:39:19 2023. Gas stoves ban, election lies, their transgender (Child mutilation and sterilization) fixation, the list goes on.This is what the Teachers Union Stands for! |
|
|
| (1926237) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Avid Reader on Thu Feb 16 06:41:01 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Jeff Rosen on Wed Feb 15 17:41:47 2023. Each of us has the POWER of The Purse.Each of us can withhold from buying an offensive product or area. An example would be, not going to Chicago, or San Franciso, or Los Angelos, or Philadelphia, and spending tourist Dollar$. |
|
|
| (1926240) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Avid Reader on Thu Feb 16 06:57:11 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by AlM on Wed Feb 15 15:11:17 2023. But they treated French people under occupation who did not try to resist better than many plantation owners treated their field hands who did not try to resist.While holding a gun to the French population with the threat of a firing squad! |
|
|
| (1926241) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Avid Reader on Thu Feb 16 07:00:32 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 03:42:19 2023. And yet private industry remained in private hands.And those hands were members of the NAZI Party! |
|
|
| (1926246) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 07:48:27 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Avid Reader on Thu Feb 16 07:00:32 2023. There was one party yes |
|
|
| (1926247) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Feb 16 08:01:07 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 02:41:36 2023. Actually by a plurality, not a majority as there were many parties. Then President von Hindenberg appointed him chancellor. |
|
|
| (1926249) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Feb 16 08:08:22 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 03:42:19 2023. No it's not. Those are necessary services provided by government not for the purpose of generating income. To think that is socialism shows a lack of understanding of socialism. |
|
|
| (1926260) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Feb 16 09:44:48 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Avid Reader on Thu Feb 16 06:27:24 2023. Entertainment comes in many forms |
|
|
| (1926261) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Feb 16 09:46:07 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Avid Reader on Thu Feb 16 06:41:01 2023. That is correct |
|
|
| (1926268) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 10:13:24 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Train Dude on Thu Feb 16 08:08:22 2023. Owned by the state and funded by taxpayers but it’s not Socialism. Ok… |
|
|
| (1926270) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 10:16:40 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 03:42:19 2023. Is this tired, proven-to-be-wrong argument being made again? |
|
|
| (1926273) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 10:26:06 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 10:16:40 2023. You’ve never proven it wrong and you can’t so… 🤷🏽🤡 |
|
|
| (1926274) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 16 10:41:52 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 00:30:44 2023. That was after he was made Chancellor. And after he was given emergency powers by the President. |
|
|
| (1926276) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 16 10:47:50 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Feb 16 08:01:07 2023. Close enough. Justin Trudeau doesn’t have a plurality of the Canadian House of Commons either.Not only that, but in the last federal election, more people voted for Conservatives than Liberals. And I complain about the Electoral Clown College. |
|
|
| (1926277) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 10:48:24 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 10:26:06 2023. You weren't "around" for this. Police, mail, military, are directly part of the government and are not social programs like the library, parks, etc... |
|
|
| (1926278) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 16 10:50:20 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Feb 16 01:50:19 2023. It’s because it’s the only example that people are actually familiar with. I’ve used other examples of authoritarianism and all I get is crickets. |
|
|
| (1926279) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Feb 16 11:07:58 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 10:48:24 2023. Um, the MTA is more completely a state agency than the USPS is a federal agency. |
|
|
| (1926280) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 11:27:21 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Avid Reader on Thu Feb 16 06:41:01 2023. Thats whats happening with that My Pillow guy. Only its on more of a corporate level than individual. Walmart & Big lots chain stores for example have pulled all his products. The individual has had the right of choice taken from them rather than let the market place determine weather Mr Lindell, under our capitalistic ways can make more $$$.Simply put, dont like him? Then dont buy his products. But dont take that choice away from me. |
|
|
| (1926281) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 12:11:32 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by AlM on Thu Feb 16 11:07:58 2023. Did I mention the MTA? Lo@lm! |
|
|
| (1926282) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 12:13:09 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 11:27:21 2023. That's the fascist "woke" at work |
|
|
| (1926284) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 12:22:12 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Avid Reader on Thu Feb 16 06:41:01 2023. Right, like I avoid red states. |
|
|
| (1926285) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Feb 16 12:35:47 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 11:27:21 2023. Walmart & Big lots chain stores for example have pulled all his products. The individual has had the right of choice taken from them rather than let the market place determine weather Mr Lindell, under our capitalistic ways can make more $$$.Walmart made a business decision. They think their earnings are better if they don't sell his products. Surely they have the right to make that decision, don't they? |
|
|
| (1926286) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 12:47:20 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by AlM on Thu Feb 16 12:35:47 2023. "Walmart made a business decision."Based on what, political ideology or its bottom line? You know full well why this was done. This is just back door censorship. You don't like the way he exercises his right of freedom of speech and thought so lets hurt him by banning his products. Yep. thats the American Way alright...NOT! |
|
|
| (1926287) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 12:57:12 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 12:22:12 2023. I would hope that an individual wouldn't be deranged enough to not go to a state that has a governor who is not in the Sam political party as themselves. I go to states governed by both D and R |
|
|
| (1926288) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 12:58:05 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 12:47:20 2023. Yes, he knows... |
|
|
| (1926289) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 16 12:58:36 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by AlM on Thu Feb 16 12:35:47 2023. Lo@lm! |
|
|
| (1926290) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Thu Feb 16 13:02:46 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 12:47:20 2023. Politics may have been part of it, but it is also a reasonable decision that Walmart determined that the profit from My Pillow sales was less than the business lost from people not shopping there as a result. I would not shop at Walmart, but it has nothing to do with whether they sold My Pillow or not. |
|
|
| (1926291) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 13:21:28 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 12:47:20 2023. You guys are real big on 'you know why they did this'. Walmart does nothing other than cold business calculations. If My Pillow was a sales leader it would still be there. |
|
|
| (1926292) | |
Re: Nimrata Nikki Randhawa |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 13:29:29 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by mtk52983 on Thu Feb 16 13:02:46 2023. Agreed, although I do shop at Walmart. |
|
|
| (1926293) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 16 13:39:10 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by mtk52983 on Thu Feb 16 13:02:46 2023. Or more likely they have limited shelf space and felt that My Pillow products didn’t sell well enough anymore to justify the allocation. |
|
|
| (1926294) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 16 13:40:49 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 12:47:20 2023. Walmart is not required to respect anyone else’s free speech (except in California), any why don’t you evince the same concern about Walmart’s right to do with its property as it sees fit? |
|
|
| (1926295) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 13:44:16 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 16 13:40:49 2023. Obviously they can do what they want. I was just questioning the motives. |
|
|
| (1926296) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 13:45:33 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 13:21:28 2023. "You guys..."I speak for myself with my own opinions. |
|
|
| (1926298) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Feb 16 14:04:50 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 12:47:20 2023. Based on what, political ideology or its bottom line?Bottom line. They don't want to be perceived as being aligned with criminals. |
|
|
| (1926299) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Feb 16 14:05:47 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by mtk52983 on Thu Feb 16 13:02:46 2023. IAWTP. |
|
|
| (1926307) | |
Re: Nikki Haley v. Don Lemon |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 16 14:46:46 2023, in response to Nikki Haley, posted by TransitChuckG on Wed Feb 15 03:58:00 2023. Lemon getting castigated for playing the age-ism game on Haley. |
|
|
| (1926309) | |
Re: Nimrata Nikki Randhawa |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 16 14:51:10 2023, in response to Re: Nimrata Nikki Randhawa, posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 13:29:29 2023. Liberals are saying that the woman is avoiding using a "brown-person-sounding" name. No reference to that? |
|
|
| (1926312) | |
Re: Nimrata Nikki Randhawa |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 15:13:21 2023, in response to Re: Nimrata Nikki Randhawa, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 16 14:51:10 2023. No, I’m just following the time-honored OT chat tradition |
|
|
| (1926313) | |
Re: Nikki Haley |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 16 15:13:58 2023, in response to Re: Nikki Haley, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Thu Feb 16 13:45:33 2023. Of course |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 6 |
||