OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE

OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE (1736302)	Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2]

Page 1 of 2

Next Page >

(1736302)	view threaded
OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 21:31:14 2020 GET A LOAD ON THIS
Post a New Response

(1736303)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Train Dude* on Wed Jun 3 21:36:22 2020, in response to OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 21:31:14 2020.* Salaam, why do you persist in betraying yourself? Even snopes says that the photo is a fake.
Post a New Response

(1736311)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Wed Jun 3 21:55:58 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jun 3 21:36:22 2020.* Because Salaam's an idiot!
Post a New Response

(1736312)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Dave* on Wed Jun 3 21:58:13 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Jun 3 21:55:58 2020.* Indeed!
Post a New Response

(1736314)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Mitch45* on Wed Jun 3 22:01:53 2020, in response to OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 21:31:14 2020.* TDS
Post a New Response

(1736318)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Wed Jun 3 22:07:08 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jun 3 21:36:22 2020.* SAYS WHO ?? SOURCE PLEASE
Post a New Response

(1736319)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Wed Jun 3 22:07:37 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Dave on Wed Jun 3 21:58:13 2020.* NOPE SHE IS A WHORE AND YOUR PREISDENT IS A PIMP
Post a New Response

(1736320)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Wed Jun 3 22:07:53 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Mitch45 on Wed Jun 3 22:01:53 2020.* WHAT ??
Post a New Response

(1736321)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Wed Jun 3 22:08:24 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Jun 3 21:55:58 2020.* YOU
Post a New Response

(1736323)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Wed Jun 3 22:16:29 2020, in response to OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 21:31:14 2020.* Adult Film Star Ron Jeremy Fighting to Save Tree Outside His Childhood Home in Queens
Post a New Response

(1736324)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Train Dude* on Wed Jun 3 22:17:01 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 22:07:08 2020.* Did you read my post? Duh
Post a New Response

(1736326)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Wed Jun 3 22:20:00 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Jun 3 22:16:29 2020.* HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Post a New Response

(1736327)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Wed Jun 3 22:20:13 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jun 3 22:17:01 2020.* I DID
Post a New Response

(1736329)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Wed Jun 3 22:21:33 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jun 3 22:17:01 2020.* I DID AND DO YOU HAVE ANY LINKS TO PROVE THIS IS A FAKE ETC .....
Post a New Response

(1736332)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Wed Jun 3 22:30:15 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 22:20:13 2020.* And what did it say?
Post a New Response

(1736333)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Train Dude* on Wed Jun 3 22:35:29 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 22:20:13 2020.* You are shaming yourself.
Post a New Response

(1736335)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Train Dude* on Wed Jun 3 22:37:23 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 22:21:33 2020.* I gave you the name of the site that says its false. In fact, they said that only a complete moron would think that the picture is real.
Post a New Response

(1736370)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Mitch45* on Thu Jun 4 03:54:57 2020, in response to OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 21:31:14 2020.* TDS
Post a New Response

(1736437)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Thu Jun 4 11:45:26 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Mitch45 on Thu Jun 4 03:54:57 2020.* WTF
Post a New Response

(1736438)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Thu Jun 4 11:45:55 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jun 3 22:37:23 2020.* I BET IT IS FOX RIGHT ? LOL
Post a New Response

(1736441)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim* on Thu Jun 4 12:04:53 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Jun 3 22:16:29 2020.* At his age, thats probably the only way he can get a "woodie"!:)
Post a New Response

(1736447)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Catfish 44* on Thu Jun 4 12:17:07 2020, in response to OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 21:31:14 2020.* Hahahahaha Good one
Post a New Response

(1736450)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Catfish 44* on Thu Jun 4 12:18:56 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Train Dude on Wed Jun 3 22:37:23 2020.* This is too effin funny
Post a New Response

(1736459)	view threaded
Re: Our classy First Lady in the White House
Posted by Olog-hai* on Thu Jun 4 12:36:09 2020, in response to OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 21:31:14 2020.* Aww. Just as hopeful as your fake pic of Trump—and Mueller who ended up running away with his tail between his legs. And how would 1990s Ron Jeremy make it into the 2017-20 White House, eh? Does he have a time machine?
Post a New Response

(1736460)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Thu Jun 4 12:36:22 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Catfish 44 on Thu Jun 4 12:17:07 2020.* YEP LOL
Post a New Response

(1736462)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Catfish 44* on Thu Jun 4 12:40:00 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Thu Jun 4 12:36:22 2020.* The girl in the photo is Traci Bingham.
Post a New Response

(1736463)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Thu Jun 4 12:40:35 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Catfish 44 on Thu Jun 4 12:40:00 2020.* LINK PROOF PROFF
Post a New Response

(1736464)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Jeff Rosen* on Thu Jun 4 12:43:54 2020, in response to OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 21:31:14 2020.* She didn't set the precedent.
Post a New Response

(1736465)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Dave* on Thu Jun 4 12:50:13 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Catfish 44 on Thu Jun 4 12:18:56 2020.* You can't make this stuff up!
Post a New Response

(1736469)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Train Dude* on Thu Jun 4 12:56:07 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Jun 4 12:43:54 2020.* Wow, I forgot about that
Post a New Response

(1736476)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Thu Jun 4 13:03:01 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Jun 4 12:43:54 2020.* Yes, but that was after being first lady and she didn't intend to be photographed. I acknowledge that the OP is fake.
Post a New Response

(1736477)	view threaded
Re: our classy first lady in the white house
Posted by Olog-hai* on Thu Jun 4 13:04:07 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Jun 4 12:43:54 2020.* Neither did she. Jackie O was ambushed.
Post a New Response

(1736482)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Catfish 44* on Thu Jun 4 13:12:55 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Thu Jun 4 12:40:35 2020.* Google her name
Post a New Response

(1736484)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Train Dude* on Thu Jun 4 13:14:34 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Catfish 44 on Thu Jun 4 13:12:55 2020.* now he thinks you said Google is her name.
Post a New Response

(1736485)	view threaded
Re: esuoh etihw eht ni ydal tsrif yssalc ruo
Posted by Olog-hai* on Thu Jun 4 13:18:53 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jun 4 13:14:34 2020.* So long as he doesn't think that "Plex" is her last name.
Post a New Response

(1736486)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Catfish 44* on Thu Jun 4 13:20:24 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jun 4 13:14:34 2020.* Haha
Post a New Response

(1736493)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Jeff Rosen* on Thu Jun 4 13:36:09 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Train Dude on Thu Jun 4 12:56:07 2020.* I have the non blurred pictures from another site but didn't think it would be wise to post them especially that I'd have to go to a hosting site.
Post a New Response

(1736495)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by FYBklyn1959* on Thu Jun 4 13:45:02 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Catfish 44 on Thu Jun 4 12:40:00 2020.* Hmm, not quite seeing it. Maybe a photoshop of Melania's face on Traci's body. Guess that pic is from an early season of The Surreal Life (fun show, I watched it when it was on VH1).
Post a New Response

(1736505)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Train Dude* on Thu Jun 4 14:19:01 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Jun 4 13:36:09 2020.* Understood. Most of us have an idea what it would look like.
Post a New Response

(1736508)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Thu Jun 4 14:31:54 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Dave on Thu Jun 4 12:50:13 2020.* WEAK ASS EXCUSES EXCUSES
Post a New Response

(1736509)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Thu Jun 4 14:32:07 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Catfish 44 on Thu Jun 4 12:18:56 2020.* WEAK ASS EXCUSES EXCUSES
Post a New Response

(1736510)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Thu Jun 4 14:32:56 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Jun 4 13:03:01 2020.* WEAK ASS EXCUSES EXCUSES
Post a New Response

(1736514)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Thu Jun 4 14:44:40 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 22:07:37 2020.* And you really this is real? Not photoshopped?
Post a New Response

(1736516)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Thu Jun 4 14:45:24 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Chicagomotorman on Thu Jun 4 14:44:40 2020.* Rand Paul holds up passage of anti-lynching bill Posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Thu Jun 4 14:40:52 2020 Rand Paul holds up passage of anti-lynching bill YAHOO NEWS TOP STORY This is part of an occasional series of Yahoo News articles and accompanying videos on how the issues America faced in the 1920s — aka “the roaring twenties” — have echoes in our own decade, a century later. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., is holding up the passage of an anti-lynching bill with broad bipartisan support — the latest delay in an effort to pass a federal law against lynching that goes back over a century. When the Emmett Till Antilynching Act passed the House 410-4 on Feb. 26, lawmakers expected it to pass in the Senate and head to President Trump’s desk within days. A Senate version, the Justice for Victims of Lynching Act, had already passed by unanimous consent in December 2018 and again in February 2019, but the House version needed to pass separately. Ordinarily the Senate handles these matters by unanimous consent, but Paul’s objection means the act named for Till, a black teenager who was kidnapped and lynched in Mississippi in 1955, requires a roll call vote, which uses up scarce floor time in the chamber. Paul told reporters on Capitol Hill on Wednesday that he wants changes to the bill to narrow the kinds of crimes it covers. “For things to pass unanimously there has to be some give and take in order to try to make the language the best we can get it,” Paul said. “We think that lynching is an awful thing that should be roundly condemned and should be universally condemned. I don’t think it’s a good idea to conflate someone who has an altercation where they had minor bruises, with lynching. We think that’s a disservice to those who were lynched in our history, who continue to have, we continue to have these problems. And I think it’s a disservice to have a new 10-year penalty for people who have minor bruising.” “The bill as written would allow altercations resulting in a cut, abrasion, bruise, or any other injury no matter how temporary to be subject to a 10-year penalty,” Paul later said in a statement from his office. “My amendment would simply apply a serious bodily injury standard, which would ensure crimes resulting in substantial risk of death and extreme physical pain be prosecuted as a lynching.” “Sen. Paul is working with the sponsors of the bill to make it stronger,” a spokesperson for Paul also told Yahoo News. The Senate’s Justice for Victims of Lynching Act was introduced by Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., and Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J. The Emmett Till Antilynching Act was introduced by Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Ill., who worked closely with Harris and Booker’s offices while crafting the bill. It would make lynching a federal crime by establishing it as a new criminal civil rights violation, and would amend federal civil rights law to include provisions on lynching. The bill says that “whoever conspires with another person to violate section 245, 247, or 249 of this title or section 901 of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3631) shall be punished in the same manner as a completed violation of such section, except that if the maximum term of imprisonment for such completed violation is less than 10 years, the person may be imprisoned for not more than 10 years.” “The language of the Emmett Till Antilynching Act is IDENTICAL to the bill that was unanimously approved by the Senate,” Rush tweeted on Tuesday. “The only conclusion I can draw from Rand Paul’s sudden opposition is he has an issue with the House bill being named after Emmett Till.” Paul’s hold on the bill, which was first reported by National Journal, comes amid mass protests that are sweeping the U.S. in response to acts of violence against African-Americans, including the killings of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery and Breonna Taylor. Arbery’s father has called his son’s death a “modern-day lynching,” and Rush believes Arbery’s death, in which three white men have been indicted, could be considered a lynching under his anti-lynching legislation. Lynching has a long, dark legacy in American history. According to the NAACP, there were 4,472 lynchings between 1882 and 1968, most of them involving black people killed at the hands of white mobs. In the post-Reconstruction South, lynching was commonly used to enforce white supremacy. The fight for federal anti-lynching legislation goes back over 100 years and involves hundreds of failed attempts. It was pushed vigorously by the NAACP and civil rights activists in the early 20th century, with Rep. Leonidas C. Dyer, R-Mo., finally introducing the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill on April 18, 1918. If passed into law, it would have charged lynch mobs with capital murder, tried lynching cases in federal court and imposed jail time and fines on state and local law enforcement officials who failed to make reasonable efforts to prevent lynchings. After stalling in the House Judiciary Committee for several years, the bill finally passed the House of Representatives on Jan. 26, 1922, and from there it needed passage in the Senate before the president could sign it into law. But with ambivalent support from Senate Republicans and adamant opposition from Southern Democrats, the bill eventually died in the Senate.
Post a New Response

(1736521)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Thu Jun 4 14:49:19 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Thu Jun 4 14:45:24 2020.* Again, without the copy and paste, you do know that picture was photoshopped?
Post a New Response

(1736535)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Thu Jun 4 15:04:36 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Chicagomotorman on Thu Jun 4 14:49:19 2020.* EXCUSES EXCUSES
Post a New Response

(1736537)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Thu Jun 4 15:05:22 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Thu Jun 4 15:04:36 2020.* Answer the question.
Post a New Response

(1736539)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Thu Jun 4 15:05:42 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Chicagomotorman on Thu Jun 4 15:05:22 2020.* WE DID
Post a New Response

(1736549)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by Dyre Dan* on Thu Jun 4 15:37:44 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Wed Jun 3 22:07:08 2020.* It may be fake, but it is/was believable, because this one was not fake.
Post a New Response

(1736550)	view threaded
Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/* on Thu Jun 4 15:39:38 2020, in response to Re: OUR CLASSY FIRST LADY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, posted by Dyre Dan on Thu Jun 4 15:37:44 2020.* IT MAY BE FAKE ........................ YOUR PHOTOS ARE REAL
Post a New Response

[1 2]
	Page 1 of 2	Next Page >

[ Return to the Message Index ]