WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?

WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes? (1693061)	Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

(1693061)	view threaded
WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Mitch45 on Fri Jan 24 11:15:25 2020 Now that the WW 3 hysteria has gone away, now we have the Coronavirus to worry about.
Post a New Response

(1693069)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by BILLBKLYN* on Fri Jan 24 11:23:29 2020, in response to WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Mitch45 on Fri Jan 24 11:15:25 2020.* And in China, they eat bats and wolves.
Post a New Response

(1693073)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Fri Jan 24 11:44:21 2020, in response to WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Mitch45 on Fri Jan 24 11:15:25 2020.* Stay off the 7 train, or at least get off by 90th Street.
Post a New Response

(1693076)	view threaded
Re: WW3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Fri Jan 24 11:49:26 2020, in response to Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 24 11:23:29 2020.* Cats too.
Post a New Response

(1693077)	view threaded
Re: WW3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Fri Jan 24 11:50:00 2020, in response to WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Mitch45 on Fri Jan 24 11:15:25 2020.* That's real, however. Just as real as Ebola.
Post a New Response

(1693088)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Orange Blossom Special* on Fri Jan 24 12:42:59 2020, in response to WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Mitch45 on Fri Jan 24 11:15:25 2020.* I bet some of our sub-chatters are still in the WWIII mode. A lot of them are slow.
Post a New Response

(1693091)	view threaded
Re: WW3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Mitch45* on Fri Jan 24 12:45:51 2020, in response to Re: WW3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 24 11:50:00 2020.* Are you suggesting that what I read on social media isn't real?
Post a New Response

(1693092)	view threaded
Re: WW3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Orange Blossom Special* on Fri Jan 24 12:51:30 2020, in response to Re: WW3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 24 11:49:26 2020.* I saw a headline that it started from a reptile or snake? Everyones always sick out there anyway, who can tell the difference. I finally got over my month long cold. Don't know what was going around last month.
Post a New Response

(1693105)	view threaded
Re: WW3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Fri Jan 24 13:13:56 2020, in response to Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Fri Jan 24 12:42:59 2020.* Yes, but fighting on the wrong side.
Post a New Response

(1693157)	view threaded
Re: WW3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Jeff Rosen* on Fri Jan 24 14:52:41 2020, in response to Re: WW3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 24 11:49:26 2020.* And Wonton soup
Post a New Response

(1693159)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Jeff Rosen* on Fri Jan 24 14:54:00 2020, in response to WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Mitch45 on Fri Jan 24 11:15:25 2020.* This too shall pass.
Post a New Response

(1693389)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by TeRrApiN Station* on Sun Jan 26 03:05:29 2020, in response to Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jan 24 11:44:21 2020.* Oh sh!t, you're right, and I have to go to Flushing this week!!!
Post a New Response

(1693390)	view threaded
Orange County, California: First case of novel coronavirus confirmed
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sun Jan 26 03:14:11 2020, in response to WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Mitch45 on Fri Jan 24 11:15:25 2020.* Orange County Health Care Agency Press Release OC Health Care Agency Confirms First Case of Novel Coronavirus in Orange County, California (Santa Ana, CA)—The OC Health Care Agency’s (HCA) Communicable Disease Control Division received confirmation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) this evening that an Orange County, California case has tested positive for the novel coronavirus. The case, a traveler from Wuhan, China, has been in contact with the HCA and was provided guidance in order to reduce exposure to the public while awaiting laboratory confirmation from the CDC. The individual has now been transported to a local hospital and is in isolation in good condition. In consultation with the CDC and the California Department of Public Health, the HCA is following up directly with all individuals who have had close contact with the case and are at risk of infection. The HCA will be monitoring any close contacts and assure that proper evaluation and care is provided if they become ill. The CDC’s guidance indicates that people who have casual contact with a case (in the same grocery store or movie theater) are at minimal risk of developing infection. There is no evidence that person-to-person transmission has occurred in Orange County. The current risk of local transmission remains low. No additional details about the case will be released at this time. Members of the media, please know that Dr. Nichole Quick, County Health Officer will be available tomorrow, January 26^th for interviews after 11 a.m. Please email JGood@ochca.com with your preferred time, and indicate if you are requesting a telephone or in-person interview.
Post a New Response

(1693396)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by AlM* on Sun Jan 26 05:42:37 2020, in response to Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by TeRrApiN Station on Sun Jan 26 03:05:29 2020.* I think SP was making a joke about Corona, not describing the portions of the 7 line heavily inhabited by persons of Chinese descent.
Post a New Response

(1693397)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by LuchAAA* on Sun Jan 26 05:45:37 2020, in response to Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by AlM on Sun Jan 26 05:42:37 2020.* in a week or two the NY Times and CNN will do a story about how business in down in Chinatown or areas like Flushing around the country and how it's racist to not support Chinese businesses in this time period.
Post a New Response

(1693402)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Mitch45* on Sun Jan 26 10:28:31 2020, in response to Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 26 05:45:37 2020.* Fuck them.
Post a New Response

(1693404)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by AlM* on Sun Jan 26 10:42:24 2020, in response to Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Mitch45 on Sun Jan 26 10:28:31 2020.* LOL. You're getting outraged about a supposed news story that hasn't even been written.
Post a New Response

(1693411)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by Mitch45* on Sun Jan 26 10:58:04 2020, in response to Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by AlM on Sun Jan 26 10:42:24 2020.* It was a retroactive "fuck them" for all the shit they've already written. And it certainly sounds like something they would publish.
Post a New Response

(1693418)	view threaded
Re: Orange County, California: First case of novel coronavirus confirmed
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sun Jan 26 12:16:24 2020, in response to Orange County, California: First case of novel coronavirus confirmed, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jan 26 03:14:11 2020.* Orange County Register Case of coronavirus confirmed in Orange County; officials call risk of transmission ‘low’ January 26, 2020 at 7:00 am The OC Health Care Agency said it received confirmation from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Saturday evening that an Orange County case has tested positive for the coronavirus that appears to have spread from China. The patient, a “traveler from Wuhan, China, has been in contact with the HCA and was provided guidance in order to reduce exposure to the public while awaiting laboratory confirmation from the CDC. The individual has now been transported to a local hospital and is in isolation in good condition,” the HCA said in a statement. The Orange County agency said it, in consultation with the CDC and the state Department of Public Health, is following up with all people who have had close contact with the patient. It said: The HCA will monitor any close contacts and assure that proper evaluation and care is provided if they become ill. The CDC’s guidance indicates that people who have casual contact with a case (such as in the same grocery store or movie theater) are at minimal risk of developing infection. There is no evidence that person-to-person transmission has occurred in Orange County. “The current risk of local transmission remains low,” the agency said in a statement. Information about the coronavirus is on the OC agency’s website. Also Saturday, the new virus accelerated its spread in China with 56 deaths so far, and the U.S. Consulate in the epicenter of the outbreak, the central city of Wuhan, announced it will evacuate its personnel and some private citizens aboard a charter flight. Chinese President Xi Jinping called the outbreak a grave situation, and the government stepped up efforts to restrict travel and public gatherings while rushing medical staff and supplies to Wuhan, which remains on lockdown. The latest figures reported Sunday morning cover the previous 24 hours and mark an increase of 15 deaths and 688 cases for a total of 1,975 infections. The government also reported five cases in Hong Kong, two in Macao and three in Taiwan. Small numbers of cases have been found in Thailand, Japan, South Korea, the U.S., Vietnam, Singapore, Malaysia, Nepal, France and Australia. Canada said it discovered its first case, the man is his 50s who recently flew from Wuhan to Guangzhou, China, and then on to Toronto.
Post a New Response

(1693419)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by TeRrApiN Station* on Sun Jan 26 13:07:59 2020, in response to Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by AlM on Sun Jan 26 05:42:37 2020.* i c what u mean
Post a New Response

(1693678)	view threaded
Re: Did the Coronavirus effect me?
Posted by Orange Blossom Special* on Mon Jan 27 13:11:23 2020, in response to WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Mitch45 on Fri Jan 24 11:15:25 2020.* I order a new "phone" to replace one that is apparently obsolete already on the networks. It has been in the "building" stages since the 17th. Supposed to have been delivered on the 23rd. It's now been 10 days without being assembled. I wonder if the factory is in Wuhan.
Post a New Response

(1693706)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?
Posted by TransitChuckG* on Mon Jan 27 19:11:36 2020, in response to WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Mitch45 on Fri Jan 24 11:15:25 2020.* Corona virus fears
Post a New Response

(1693764)	view threaded
Coronavirus: 4474 cases, 107 deaths, 63 recoveries
Posted by Henry R32 #3730* on Tue Jan 28 01:58:11 2020, in response to WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Mitch45 on Fri Jan 24 11:15:25 2020.* We're up to 4474 confirmed cases, with 107 deaths and only 63 recoveries. So of the people who got it and are, uh, no longer worrying about it, 37% are still among us. This might be a bad one. Live Map for the curious.
Post a New Response

(1693802)	view threaded
Re: WW 3 Yes, But Coronavirus wha dat?
Posted by Orange Blossom Special* on Tue Jan 28 09:25:28 2020, in response to WW 3 No, But Coronavirus Yes?, posted by Mitch45 on Fri Jan 24 11:15:25 2020.* If WW3 is done, why the heck did they protest last Saturday all over the country against this War with Iran we're supposedly involved with?
Post a New Response

(1693811)	view threaded
Re: Did the Coronavirus effect me?
Posted by Orange Blossom Special* on Tue Jan 28 09:56:37 2020, in response to Re: Did the Coronavirus effect me?, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Jan 27 13:11:23 2020.* I read an article this week that said a lot of the phones are made in Wuhan. Mine is now in the factory queue for 11 days. Was supposed to have been here 5 days ago. I guess I'm not going to be getting a new device anytime soon.
Post a New Response

[ Return to the Message Index ]