Uh, oh! (1667976) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
(1667976) | |
Uh, oh! |
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Sun Oct 20 18:42:55 2019 Inquiry |
|
(1667981) | |
Re: Uh, oh? |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 20 18:46:02 2019, in response to Uh, oh!, posted by TransitChuckG on Sun Oct 20 18:42:55 2019. Hah, more fake news. |
|
(1667983) | |
Re: Uh, oh! |
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Oct 20 18:48:47 2019, in response to Uh, oh!, posted by TransitChuckG on Sun Oct 20 18:42:55 2019. Not so critical. The House has plenty of willing witnesses. |
|
(1668089) | |
Re: Uh, oh! |
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Oct 21 10:32:44 2019, in response to Re: Uh, oh!, posted by AlM on Sun Oct 20 18:48:47 2019. With no one to witness the "witness"BAHAHAHAHAHAHA How about that ICE? |
|
(1668093) | |
Re: HAHAHAH; #RESIGN |
|
Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Oct 21 10:40:20 2019, in response to Re: Uh, oh!, posted by AlM on Sun Oct 20 18:48:47 2019. I just saw what you're referring to.TWO witnesses set to secretly testify at the same time, so that no one can question them. Brilliant move! Where's law and justice pig to show outrage at this one? |
|
(1668098) | |
Re: HAHAHAH; #RESIGN |
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Oct 21 11:11:25 2019, in response to Re: HAHAHAH; #RESIGN, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Oct 21 10:40:20 2019. Secret testimony can't be used as the basis for impeachment.There is plenty of public testimony about Trump's actions with respect to Ukraine. There is also Mulvaney's public confession. |
|