Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3]

< Previous Page  

Page 2 of 3

Next Page >  

(1478484)

view threaded

Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word

Posted by R30A on Tue Nov 28 21:23:54 2017, in response to Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word, posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Nov 28 21:18:19 2017.

I never said it was.

Post a New Response

(1478485)

view threaded

Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word

Posted by bingbong on Tue Nov 28 21:25:48 2017, in response to Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word, posted by R30A on Tue Nov 28 21:09:41 2017.

With all due respect, I wouldn't call someone whose politics are informed by their life experience either misguided or misinformed. I have seen what works. I have seen what fails. The differences are monumental and glaring.

Post a New Response

(1478486)

view threaded

Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word

Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Nov 28 21:25:51 2017, in response to Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word, posted by R30A on Tue Nov 28 21:23:54 2017.

It must be, since you seem to be answering for her.

Post a New Response

(1478487)

view threaded

Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word

Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Nov 28 21:27:25 2017, in response to Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word, posted by bingbong on Tue Nov 28 21:25:48 2017.

James O'Keefe has more integrity in his little pinkie than you do in your entire being.


Post a New Response

(1478492)

view threaded

Re: Stop feeding the trolls

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Nov 28 22:27:42 2017, in response to Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word, posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Nov 28 21:27:25 2017.

They say the same crap over and over. Starve 'em.

Post a New Response

(1478494)

view threaded

List of Times James O'Keefe Owned Himself

Posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 28 22:43:31 2017, in response to James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Nov 28 07:43:26 2017.

This list proves James O’Keefe is the king of self-owns

Hahahaha, what a clown.

Post a New Response

(1478495)

view threaded

Re: List of Times James O'Keefe Owned Himself

Posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Nov 28 23:12:49 2017, in response to List of Times James O'Keefe Owned Himself, posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 28 22:43:31 2017.

Daily Dot, what a clown!

Post a New Response

(1478496)

view threaded

Re: List of Times James O'Keefe Owned Himself?

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Nov 28 23:15:01 2017, in response to List of Times James O'Keefe Owned Himself, posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 28 22:43:31 2017.

Yah rite. Daily Dot. LOL!

What really shows is how much the left fears him.

Post a New Response

(1478497)

view threaded

Re: List of Times James O'Keefe Owned Himself?

Posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 28 23:16:26 2017, in response to Re: List of Times James O'Keefe Owned Himself?, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Nov 28 23:15:01 2017.

Nah, more like Ology of Horror.

Post a New Response

(1478498)

view threaded

Re: List of Times James O'Keefe Owned Himself

Posted by Fred G on Tue Nov 28 23:17:02 2017, in response to Re: List of Times James O'Keefe Owned Himself, posted by R2Chinatown on Tue Nov 28 23:12:49 2017.

I enjoy seeing O'Keefe self immolate.

Post a New Response

(1478499)

view threaded

Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word

Posted by R30A on Tue Nov 28 23:38:30 2017, in response to Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word, posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Nov 28 21:25:51 2017.

I never stated that I was speaking for anybody but myself.

I doubt that bingbong considers herself to be misinformed.

Post a New Response

(1478505)

view threaded

Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word

Posted by AlM on Wed Nov 29 03:36:20 2017, in response to Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word, posted by R30A on Tue Nov 28 21:09:41 2017.

+100

Post a New Response

(1478515)

view threaded

Re: Stop feeding the trolls

Posted by bingbong on Wed Nov 29 08:48:01 2017, in response to Re: Stop feeding the trolls, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Nov 28 22:27:42 2017.

Yes, you do.

Post a New Response

(1479001)

view threaded

Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word

Posted by orange blossom special on Fri Dec 1 15:08:15 2017, in response to James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Nov 28 07:43:26 2017.

Washington Post has been ignoring the news Hillary's Fusion GPS having paid Journolist to put out fake news.

Think the Bezo's Post got a paycheck from them?

Post a New Response

(1479004)

view threaded

Re:

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 1 15:23:58 2017, in response to Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word, posted by orange blossom special on Fri Dec 1 15:08:15 2017.

Don't feed the troll.

Post a New Response

(1479013)

view threaded

Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word

Posted by ClearAspect on Fri Dec 1 16:01:29 2017, in response to Re: James O’Keefe Busted Lying, Conservatives Dont say a word, posted by orange blossom special on Fri Dec 1 15:08:15 2017.

Lol post that link inbredblossomspecial

Post a New Response

(1479014)

view threaded

Re: olog supports white supremacists

Posted by ClearAspect on Fri Dec 1 16:02:26 2017, in response to Re:, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Dec 1 15:23:58 2017.

Oh, its cool we know you support white supremacists, defending them and supporting conservatives who lie about it.

Post a New Response

(1479159)

view threaded

Re:

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Dec 2 03:28:09 2017, in response to Re: olog supports white supremacists, posted by ClearAspect on Fri Dec 1 16:02:26 2017.

When all else fails, blather about "white supremacists". They have idiots in college now calling every white person a "white supremacist", so that's in the toilet now.

Post a New Response

(1617715)

view threaded

Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 07:00:08 2019, in response to Re: James O’Keefe lied on video and Olog defends a liar, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Nov 28 12:00:45 2017.

The judge found that they did not lie, streetcarliar1.



Post a New Response

(1617730)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 07:21:54 2019, in response to Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 07:00:08 2019.

No news links and no link to PACER. Fake news.

Post a New Response

(1617737)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 07:39:43 2019, in response to Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 07:00:08 2019.

Hey LIAR-hai, this lawsuit has nothing to do with the Post article Streetcarman referenced.

Post a New Response

(1617738)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 07:40:13 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 07:39:43 2019.

FUCK! I fell for his crap.

Sorry, Clearaspect!

Post a New Response

(1617744)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 07:47:38 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 07:21:54 2019.

Heh. I did a quick Google search and found nothing but their own posting.



Post a New Response

(1617747)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 08:32:42 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 07:47:38 2019.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6081022/wentz-v-project-veritas/

Found this by searching the Plaintiff's name and Veritas.

Post a New Response

(1617762)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 09:50:05 2019, in response to Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 07:00:08 2019.

Too bad nobody replied.

Post a New Response

(1617763)

view threaded

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 09:55:02 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 09:50:05 2019.

Too bad the OP was a blank post.

Post a New Response

(1617764)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 09:56:34 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 09:50:05 2019.

Yes, very sad.

Post a New Response

(1617768)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 10:08:15 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 09:50:05 2019.

Hmm.

Summary judgment means that the case was dismissed out of hand before evidence was heard. So how could the court have determined that the videos were not edited or deceptive?

Sounds more like the court was saying, we don't care what the videos showed, plaintiff doesn't have the right to bring this case under the law.




Post a New Response

(1617770)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 10:36:44 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 10:08:15 2019.

No.

Post a New Response

(1617771)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Apr 17 10:48:40 2019, in response to Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 07:00:08 2019.

The judge didn't make any finding at all.

Post a New Response

(1617772)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 10:50:39 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 10:36:44 2019.

???

Summary judgment means there was no trial on the facts of the case.


Post a New Response

(1617773)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 10:51:48 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Apr 17 10:48:40 2019.

FALSE!

Post a New Response

(1617775)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 11:17:00 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 10:50:39 2019.

You made four false assertions:

1. No evidence was heard.
2. The Court doesn't care what the videos showed.
3. Plaintiff didn't have the right to bring this case under the law.
4. The case was dismissed "out of hand."

Post a New Response

(1617776)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Apr 17 11:19:28 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 10:51:48 2019.

If the case was summarily dismissed before evidence was introduced, what was there for a judge to find?

Post a New Response

(1617778)

view threaded

Re: Project Truth wins defamation case

Posted by cortelyounext on Wed Apr 17 11:20:50 2019, in response to Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 07:00:08 2019.

Once again, subject corrected.

Post a New Response

(1617779)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 11:23:25 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Apr 17 11:19:28 2019.

The judge found in favor of the Defendants.

Post a New Response

(1617782)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 11:52:16 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 09:56:34 2019.

Still nobody responded. Wow.

Post a New Response

(1617786)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 12:23:24 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 11:52:16 2019.

Perhaps you should look up the dictionary definitions of the words "replied" and "responded."




Post a New Response

(1617787)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 12:23:57 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 11:17:00 2019.

OK, 0 for 4. :(



Post a New Response

(1617817)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 16:20:31 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 17 09:50:05 2019.

So aren't you going to link us to a copy of the judge's ruling so that we can read what he said?



Post a New Response

(1617819)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 16:24:03 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 16:20:31 2019.

I already did. And I may have paid 20˘ for it. You're welcome.

Post a New Response

(1617824)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Fred G on Wed Apr 17 16:29:27 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 16:24:03 2019.

I always said you have a lot of good ˘ ˘

Post a New Response

(1617901)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by SLRT on Wed Apr 17 20:53:47 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 08:32:42 2019.

You got 'em, Pigs.

Post a New Response

(1617906)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 22:18:01 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 17 16:24:03 2019.

???

I followed your link. It just said "summary judgment."





Post a New Response

(1617908)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?

Posted by The Silence on Wed Apr 17 22:51:07 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Apr 17 10:48:40 2019.

the very fact the case was dismissed means the judge agreed with the defendants that the plaintiff offered nothing to prove the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt.


Post a New Response

(1617911)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 18 02:44:49 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?, posted by The Silence on Wed Apr 17 22:51:07 2019.

Sigh.

This has nothing to do with "reasonable doubt." This wasn't a criminal trial.

Post a New Response

(1617912)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 18 02:47:42 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by AlM on Wed Apr 17 22:18:01 2019.

My link was to the docket report. The order is the most recent document. You can find the Defendants' motion and read that.

Post a New Response

(1617939)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 18 05:23:24 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case?, posted by The Silence on Wed Apr 17 22:51:07 2019.

Explaining the obvious to those who try to rewrite reality. Well done.

Post a New Response

(1617944)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 18 05:32:49 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 18 05:23:24 2019.

No, he's not, idiot. Reasonable doubt has nothing to do with anything.

People should really stop pretending to have legal expertise on this board.

Post a New Response

(1617946)

view threaded

Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case

Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 18 05:37:22 2019, in response to Re: Project Veritas wins defamation case, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 18 05:32:49 2019.

Especially Olog.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3]

< Previous Page  

Page 2 of 3

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]