Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4]

< Previous Page  

Page 4 of 4

 

(1603167)

view threaded

Re: $250 Million take that!

Posted by bingbong on Wed Feb 20 21:24:39 2019, in response to Re: $250 Million take that!, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Feb 20 21:04:44 2019.

Oh yes she does.

Post a New Response

(1603168)

view threaded

Re: $250 Million take that!

Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Wed Feb 20 21:34:21 2019, in response to Re: $250 Million take that!, posted by bingbong on Wed Feb 20 20:19:54 2019.

"What he has...that donor network...."

Don't write him off just yet. He raised 6 million dollars in 48 hrs. Eyebrows have been raised too.
No other Dem contender has come anywhere near that.

Post a New Response

(1603171)

view threaded

Re: $250 Million take that!

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Feb 20 21:37:58 2019, in response to Re: $250 Million take that!, posted by bingbong on Wed Feb 20 21:24:14 2019.

I guarantee you that each and every single one of those kids grows up to be a success

Post a New Response

(1603172)

view threaded

Re: $250 Million take that!

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Feb 20 21:39:01 2019, in response to Re: $250 Million take that!, posted by bingbong on Wed Feb 20 21:24:39 2019.

You live in your alternate reality. The bingbubble as it were

Post a New Response

(1603174)

view threaded

Re: $250 Million take that!

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Wed Feb 20 21:44:03 2019, in response to Re: $250 Million take that!, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Feb 20 21:37:58 2019.

Wasting your time. Bingbong knows nothing about raising children but her pro-late term abortion stance and other factors show just how much she hates children.

Post a New Response

(1603175)

view threaded

Re: $250 Million take that!

Posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Feb 20 22:02:31 2019, in response to Re: $250 Million take that!, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Wed Feb 20 21:44:03 2019.

Lol

Post a New Response

(1603176)

view threaded

Re: $250 Million take that!

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Wed Feb 20 22:37:33 2019, in response to Re: $250 Million take that!, posted by Chicagomotorman on Wed Feb 20 22:02:31 2019.

That wasn't meant as a joke. Bingbong hates children

Post a New Response

(1603179)

view threaded

Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million

Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Thu Feb 21 02:35:43 2019, in response to Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million, posted by Fred G on Wed Feb 20 10:12:33 2019.

Why is he filing in Kentucky? The event in question as well as the paper are both located in Washington DC.

I honestly thought that was a ridiculously high amount to begin with anyway. The remaining $50 million is less ridiculous. I figured he'd have taken a shotgun approach at all the media outlets / celebrities going for ~$10 million each or something, not try and catch a whale.

Post a New Response

(1603184)

view threaded

Re: $250 Million take that!

Posted by 3-9 on Thu Feb 21 02:55:13 2019, in response to Re: $250 Million take that!, posted by AlM on Wed Feb 20 20:27:58 2019.

If he comes up with nothing on Trump, then fine, we drop the topic.

Which is more than what conservatives do when Obama or a Clinton is in the hot seat.

Post a New Response

(1603185)

view threaded

Re: $250 Million take that!

Posted by N6 Limited on Thu Feb 21 02:57:14 2019, in response to Re: $250 Million take that!, posted by JayZeeBMT on Wed Feb 20 07:35:58 2019.

"There is already too much out there pointing squarely at the campaign and the Russians"


Yeah, too much fake news.

Post a New Response

(1603193)

view threaded

Re: $250 Million take that!

Posted by Fred G on Thu Feb 21 03:49:26 2019, in response to Re: $250 Million take that!, posted by 3-9 on Thu Feb 21 02:55:13 2019.

We still keep hearing about uranium one

#TDS

Post a New Response

(1603207)

view threaded

Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 21 08:17:47 2019, in response to Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million, posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Thu Feb 21 02:35:43 2019.

The event is the paper’s alleged libel, not the incident with the “Black Israelites” and the Aboriginal man. They plead as to venue in the complaint by stating that the Washington Post does business in Kentucky and therefore the libel took place in Kentucky, inter alia.

Post a New Response

(1603210)

view threaded

Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 21 08:28:49 2019, in response to Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 21 08:17:47 2019.

Abos are in Australia, this guy is an indian!

Post a New Response

(1603223)

view threaded

Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 21 09:22:52 2019, in response to Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 21 08:28:49 2019.

This isn’t the Falkland Islands or Bermuda, there are Aboriginal Americans.

Post a New Response

(1603234)

view threaded

Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 21 09:55:18 2019, in response to Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 21 09:22:52 2019.

Indians! Whoowoowoowoowoowoowoowoowoowoowoowoowoo!!

Post a New Response

(1603236)

view threaded

Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 21 09:59:07 2019, in response to Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 21 09:55:18 2019.

HOW? You've been drinking too much firewater.

Post a New Response

(1603252)

view threaded

Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Feb 21 10:37:23 2019, in response to Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Feb 21 09:59:07 2019.

Me no likeum!

Post a New Response

(1603260)

view threaded

Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million?

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Feb 21 10:53:12 2019, in response to Re: It may be a lot less than $250 Million, posted by Fred G on Wed Feb 20 10:12:33 2019.

LOL "may have". And double LOL @ Dan Abrams of all people. Are you bleating "four legs good, two legs better" yet?

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4]

< Previous Page  

Page 4 of 4

 

[ Return to the Message Index ]