|
|
| Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' (1592874) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||
|
| (1593308) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 10:45:15 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Jan 21 07:41:13 2019. We will see at the polls next year. |
|
|
| (1593309) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 10:48:41 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 07:50:41 2019. Pelosi has already sent a bill to the Senate. Now it's McConnell's turn to get something passed. Then they sit down and negotiate. |
|
|
| (1593311) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 21 10:49:40 2019, in response to Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by Mitch45 on Mon Jan 21 09:37:21 2019. Open the government then we’ll talk |
|
|
| (1593314) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by https://salaamallah.com/ on Mon Jan 21 10:51:37 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 10:48:41 2019. iawtp |
|
|
| (1593316) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 10:52:05 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by Mitch45 on Mon Jan 21 10:02:31 2019. What's your point? It's McConnell's turn to get something through the Senate now. The two bills won't agree, so then it goes to a House/Senate conference to work out something both sides can pass.This is how it's worked for 225 years. |
|
|
| (1593317) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 21 10:52:58 2019, in response to Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by Mitch45 on Mon Jan 21 09:37:21 2019. The left doesn't believe in compromise. Their way or no way, and if it's not their way, they whine. |
|
|
| (1593318) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 21 10:53:29 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Jan 21 07:41:13 2019. LOL!!! |
|
|
| (1593322) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 21 10:57:47 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 21 10:52:58 2019. Kind of sounds like Mitch McConnell |
|
|
| (1593323) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 10:59:38 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 21 07:53:34 2019. It's going to be the same landscape as it was in 2016. The American people will vote for Donald Trump once again and the fractured Democratic party would wonder what the hell happened? |
|
|
| (1593324) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 21 11:00:43 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 10:59:38 2019. Unfortunately that is true. They will put a Cortes, Warren, or Sanders type up, think it's just wonderful, and the same thing will happen. |
|
|
| (1593325) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 11:01:15 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 21 10:57:47 2019. Well Olog-hai did say that Mitch McConnell was a RINO |
|
|
| (1593326) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 11:01:37 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 21 08:10:30 2019. Your problem is you need to stop doubting and start listening to us. |
|
|
| (1593327) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 21 11:02:30 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 21 08:10:30 2019. he won't. But they will put some type like that up, think how wonderful it is, and the same thing will happen again. |
|
|
| (1593329) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 11:04:38 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 21 10:49:40 2019. "We'll"? |
|
|
| (1593332) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 11:06:30 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 21 10:57:47 2019. But I thought McConnell had passed a bill in the Senate and Pelosi was refusing to consider it. Have I got that wrong? |
|
|
| (1593340) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 11:23:35 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 21 11:00:43 2019. The Democrats have to realize that normal people with jobs, like us, who have houses and who have kids and who pay tuition, and who have other bills do not want to be taxed out of their ass for these bulshit social programs |
|
|
| (1593341) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 11:24:30 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 21 11:00:43 2019. About the only name who doesn't fit that mold and has at least expressed an interest in running is Montana Governor Steve Bullock |
|
|
| (1593342) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 11:26:11 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 11:06:30 2019. A bill was passed last Senate, but with the end of the Congress anything that had not completed the process automatically "dies." In this Congress, Nancy Pelosi passed a bill in the House, but the Senate has not acted. |
|
|
| (1593343) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jan 21 11:30:35 2019, in response to Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by Mitch45 on Mon Jan 21 09:37:21 2019. The way this is going on is as if Trump is Israel (under Netanyahu) and Pelosi represents the Palestinians. |
|
|
| (1593344) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 11:32:04 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 11:23:35 2019. Some of those "bulshit social programs" cost less in the long run. Our tax dollars fund the hospitalization of those who do not have health insurance (by choice or otherwise). The problem is those without health insurance either use hospitals for everything or they wait until it gets really bad. If everybody had access to yearly physicals without expense, a lot of the expenses of hospitalization could be avoided and we would reduce the strain on Emergency Rooms for non-emergent cases. If someone is found to be pre-Diabetic in a blood test, diet/exercise can change that. The person without insurance won't be seen until they show up in the ER needing amputations. What costs less to the public, one blood test or a surgical procedure? |
|
|
| (1593350) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 21 12:04:05 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 11:04:38 2019. Oh yes, I'm in on this, Bill. |
|
|
| (1593351) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 12:05:39 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 11:32:04 2019. Deny hospitalization to those who can't pay, and that problem is solved. If the work is done, and then the hospital finss out they can't pay, make them work it off. |
|
|
| (1593354) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Mon Jan 21 12:10:59 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 12:05:39 2019. I don't agree with that. There has to be something in the middle. You can't just not treat a sick person. |
|
|
| (1593357) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 12:14:24 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 21 12:04:05 2019. Then stop being stubborn and open the government! |
|
|
| (1593358) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 12:15:00 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by gp38/r42 chris on Mon Jan 21 12:10:59 2019. I'm just being obnoxious! |
|
|
| (1593360) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 12:23:27 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 12:14:24 2019. The bill that passed the House does that and defers consideration of the "Wall" until after the government is open. Mitch McConnell refuses to bring that to a vote in the Senate. |
|
|
| (1593361) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 12:26:36 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 11:26:11 2019. Your sarcasm meter just failed.(Yeah, OK, it wasn't totally obvious, but I've made the same point in a non-sarcastic way many times in the last few days. Of course, Chris is totally oblivious and wonders why I am agreeing with him.) |
|
|
| (1593362) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Jan 21 12:27:26 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 12:15:00 2019. No, you're not. You have said many ties here, in all seriousness, that "healthcare is a luxury, not a right". You believe that those who cannot afford medicine should die. |
|
|
| (1593364) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 12:29:36 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by gp38/r42 chris on Mon Jan 21 12:10:59 2019. You can't just not treat a sick person.Just look what it does to keep Social Security costs down! |
|
|
| (1593368) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Jan 21 12:33:04 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 11:01:15 2019. ...Olog-hai did say...
|
|
|
| (1593373) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 12:40:04 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 11:24:30 2019. By "not fitting the mold" do you mean white males?Non-Sanderistas include Biden, Brown, and O'Rourke, all of whom have a realistic chance. (No one has a good chance in such a broad field.) |
|
|
| (1593377) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 21 12:45:25 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 10:59:38 2019. The American people didn’t vote for Trump in 2016. 2020 might well be a repeat of that. And it would be the Democrats’ fault because they know or should know how it works. |
|
|
| (1593382) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 21 13:19:52 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 21 12:45:25 2019. They haven't learned, or it certainly seems that way. |
|
|
| (1593386) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 21 13:35:41 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 10:59:38 2019. Doubtful. Especially considering they didn't last time either. |
|
|
| (1593388) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 21 13:36:25 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 21 13:19:52 2019. Did you believe in early 2015 that Trump would be the Republican nominee? The Democrats might still put out a reputable candidate who can beat Trump. I'm just not optimistic. |
|
|
| (1593392) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Jan 21 13:44:23 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 12:05:39 2019. So people dropping dead at the steps of the hospital is preferable to you? That's what you're advocating. |
|
|
| (1593396) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Jan 21 13:50:40 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 11:23:35 2019. You also have to understand when to turn off the bullshit and be realistic.Realistically speaking...people who voted for that man KNEW he wasnt qualified for the job. Also..they KNEW EXACTLY WHAT KIND OF PERSON HE WAS. Bottom line..they Voted For him because they THINK like him...in terms of being a... 1)WS 2)WR 3)WN So when You say We...you are basically saying WHAT you are all about...the White Rage representative. |
|
|
| (1593397) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Jan 21 13:53:21 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 21 13:36:25 2019. The reason I am not optimistic is because they haven't learned from then. I keep hearing all the same things that got them into this mess. |
|
|
| (1593399) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Jan 21 13:58:00 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by Edwards! on Mon Jan 21 13:50:40 2019. In Chinese, is your name PronouncedSUM DUM FUK |
|
|
| (1593401) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 14:03:18 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 12:40:04 2019. Sherrod Brown and Beto O'Rourke are quite Liberal. The other downside to Brown is that he would be replaced in the Senate by a Republican. Not fitting the mold of a Sandersista. Bernie Sanders is a white male last I checked. |
|
|
| (1593403) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 21 14:04:45 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 14:03:18 2019. I don't think that a full liberal (as opposed to a moderate or a supposed socialist) would lose. |
|
|
| (1593405) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 14:10:53 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 14:03:18 2019. Not fitting the mold of a Sandersista.But in that case there are plenty of women and non-white men too. |
|
|
| (1593406) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 14:12:33 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 14:10:53 2019. I agree. Only problem is none of them have presently declared their candidacy. Don't know enough about Julian Castro from Texas. Amy Klobuchar is a woman and also doesn't fit the mold of a Sandersista. |
|
|
| (1593409) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jan 21 14:27:53 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 12:14:24 2019. Nah; leave it closed. Too many things the federal government took over have to go back to the private sector or to the states. |
|
|
| (1593411) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Jan 21 14:31:15 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by TRAIN DUDE on Mon Jan 21 13:58:00 2019. Just as you are the upfront very callous rep of what White Wrath..looks like.You cant tell me a fucking thing about how politics work in this country. You cant tell me shit about anything...because You are the basic Frontline Devil. Meaning YOU ARE A FUCKING MOUTHPIECE that doesnt matter. Fuck you . |
|
|
| (1593412) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 21 14:31:43 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 14:12:33 2019. One problem I have with Julian Castro is his name. No, I don't mean his surname, we had a president named "Hussein" after all. I mean his first name. I'd get sick of pronouncing it that way for four years or more. He should just call himself "Jewel-ian" already.And it's not a matter of it being a Spanish name. If his name were the similar "Julio," I'd have no problem with it because the Spanish way is the natural way of pronouncing that name. |
|
|
| (1593414) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 21 14:33:20 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 21 14:31:43 2019. I'm sure Republicans would fix that by always calling him "Fidel." :) |
|
|
| (1593418) | |
Re: Trump's ''Compromise'' |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Mon Jan 21 15:12:04 2019, in response to Re: Trump's ''Compromise'', posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 21 14:31:43 2019. I had 4 years of Spanish, but from not speaking or using it, forgot 99% of it. But I do remember "J" at the beginning is pronounced "H". "H" at the beginning is silent, our professor told us , "like the X in fish":) |
|
|
| (1593419) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Mon Jan 21 15:13:12 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by mtk52983 on Mon Jan 21 12:23:27 2019. Somebody will have to budge!!! |
|
|
| (1593427) | |
Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise'') |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Mon Jan 21 16:06:25 2019, in response to Re: Pelosi’s Compromise? Crickets (Re: Trump's ''Compromise''), posted by TransitChuckG on Mon Jan 21 15:13:12 2019. Trump should budge, and then duly point out that he had to be the better person! |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||