|
|
| Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters (1589814) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (1589814) | |
Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jan 10 19:00:44 2019 LinkThis is only of interest for people who care about the future of the Democratic Party. All others, don't waste your time. |
|
|
| (1589897) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 01:57:58 2019, in response to Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by AlM on Thu Jan 10 19:00:44 2019. I love how the author assumes that Millennials, blacks, and hispanics are automatically Democrat. For some reason, I didn't see MY type of Democrat listed.🤔🤔 |
|
|
| (1589925) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jan 11 08:23:18 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 01:57:58 2019. Idiot. |
|
|
| (1589929) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Fri Jan 11 08:31:46 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 01:57:58 2019. You mean lying republican? |
|
|
| (1589935) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Fri Jan 11 09:21:13 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 01:57:58 2019. You are not interested in the future well-being of the national Democratic Party. There was nothing in that article for you. |
|
|
| (1589941) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 09:30:34 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 11 09:21:13 2019. Says who?! |
|
|
| (1589947) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Fri Jan 11 09:40:15 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 09:30:34 2019. Me. |
|
|
| (1589956) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 09:59:47 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 11 09:40:15 2019. Well seeing that you don't know me, that's just your opinion |
|
|
| (1590006) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Jan 11 13:21:06 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 01:57:58 2019. 😂😂😂😂😂🙄🙄🙄 |
|
|
| (1590023) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 14:44:04 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jan 11 08:23:18 2019. Are you looking in the mirror? |
|
|
| (1590024) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 14:44:29 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by bingbong on Fri Jan 11 08:31:46 2019. I've told you a thousand times before, I've been a registered Democrat since I was 17 years old. |
|
|
| (1590032) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Fri Jan 11 15:44:21 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 14:44:29 2019. Irrelevant. |
|
|
| (1590039) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Fri Jan 11 16:21:58 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 01:57:58 2019. What is YOUR type of Democrat? Which Democrats (declared or not) would you vote for in the general election if that Democrat received the nomination? |
|
|
| (1590186) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 00:40:02 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by AlM on Fri Jan 11 15:44:21 2019. THEREFORE... I am NOT a "RWer Republican", NOR did I vote for Trump, THEREFORE... I'm not a "Trumper". I hope, once again, that I cleared the air. |
|
|
| (1590188) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 12 00:45:47 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 00:40:02 2019. The left just loves their labels. |
|
|
| (1590190) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 12 00:48:00 2019, in response to Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by AlM on Thu Jan 10 19:00:44 2019. LOL! The Democratic Party has no future. They've relied on dirty tricks for too long to try to keep their dirty paws on power.And since when are you the webmaster, eh? The "analysis" of Republican constituencies fails utterly, too. |
|
|
| (1590191) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 12 00:48:36 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Jan 11 01:57:58 2019. That's why this is no analysis. It's as much garbage as the Steele dossier. |
|
|
| (1590203) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 02:31:41 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by mtk52983 on Fri Jan 11 16:21:58 2019. One with who I agree with, politically. I voted for Prince Andy Boy the FIRST time around. |
|
|
| (1590205) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 12 02:41:06 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 02:31:41 2019. Why? |
|
|
| (1590219) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 03:56:14 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 12 02:41:06 2019. Because the R challenger was a nut job! I didn't vote for him the second time around. |
|
|
| (1590228) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Sat Jan 12 04:37:51 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 02:31:41 2019. Nice non-answer to any of my questions. Name me which Democrats in 2020 you would vote for for President. |
|
|
| (1590237) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jan 12 05:07:21 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by mtk52983 on Sat Jan 12 04:37:51 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/12/world/europe/france-paris-explosion.html |
|
|
| (1590239) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 05:09:26 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by mtk52983 on Sat Jan 12 04:37:51 2019. So far, none. I'm a Blue Dog. I guess. A middle of the roader. |
|
|
| (1590246) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Sat Jan 12 05:48:52 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 05:09:26 2019. If you can’t name a Democrat, declared or not, who you would vote for in 2020, that does not make you a “blue dog” or a “middle of the roader”, that makes you a Republican. |
|
|
| (1590252) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 07:27:51 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by mtk52983 on Sat Jan 12 05:48:52 2019. It makes me a free-thinker. Plus, not everyone threw their hat in the ring yet. |
|
|
| (1590254) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Jan 12 07:40:01 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 07:27:51 2019. Plus, not everyone threw their hat in the ring yet.As mtk said, that wasn't a requirement. You're not a blue dog. You're a "Never D" Democrat. |
|
|
| (1590260) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 09:06:27 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by AlM on Sat Jan 12 07:40:01 2019. How can I be when I've been voting for Democrats as well as Republicans since I started voting? |
|
|
| (1590307) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 12 10:41:24 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 07:27:51 2019. It makes me a free-thinkerThe left is still fond of that buzz-phrase. |
|
|
| (1590308) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 12 10:47:05 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 03:56:14 2019. Because the R challenger was a nut jobYou have absolutely no basis in accusing Paladino of that. None whatsoever. You're more of a lefty than you think you are. |
|
|
| (1590329) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 12 11:30:12 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 12 10:47:05 2019. Paladino is the Buffalo equivalent of Trump. |
|
|
| (1590594) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Jan 13 00:58:39 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 12 10:41:24 2019. I've NEVER heard of that referred to by the Left. In fact, there is NO free thought nowadays. You have to think in lock-step with THEIR line of thought, lest you be ostracized. |
|
|
| (1590602) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Jan 13 01:07:27 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jan 12 10:47:05 2019. Having my opinion about him makes me a Lefty? Now THAT is a LW train of thought. Based on watching and reading about him and his antics, PLUS dealing with psychos for years, he didn't get MY vote. |
|
|
| (1590606) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jan 13 01:20:52 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Jan 13 01:07:27 2019. You said "he was a nut job", which is exactly the thing a left-winger would say. That is no "opinion" which consists of little more than an Alinsky-style personal attack, just as falsely accusing me of exhibiting "a LW train of thought" is. I only judge by what I read.And again, you offer empty innuendo and nothing concrete, "watching and reading about him and his (supposed and unidentified) 'antics'". Just as a left-winger would. |
|
|
| (1590632) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Jan 13 02:33:18 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Jan 13 01:20:52 2019. It is also something a right-winger would say as well. I don't live my life as a political ideology nor does my train of thought reflect that.You didn't see when he went nuts on that videotape, back in the day? Cuomo was no bargain, but IN MY OPINION, he was the lesser of 2 evils at the time. |
|
|
| (1590635) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Jan 13 02:39:19 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Jan 12 09:06:27 2019. You've left the national party. |
|
|
| (1590647) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Jan 13 05:17:09 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Jan 13 02:33:18 2019. You’re right; had the GOP run somebody even like Pataki, it could be a whole different world right now. Maybe not but at least it would’ve been closer.📞🎙 |
|
|
| (1590648) | |
Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 13 05:25:30 2019, in response to Re: Interesting (for Democrats) analysis of Democratic voters, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Jan 13 02:33:18 2019. women are causing most of the problems though.Look at the threads about women going to places like Morocco getting raped and beheaded on the internet. |
|
|