Re: The worst possible outcome? (1580944) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 4 of 4 |
(1581827) | |
Re: The worst possible outcome? |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Dec 12 16:36:59 2018, in response to Re: The worst possible outcome?, posted by 3-9 on Wed Dec 12 15:45:34 2018. Again, only preferential voting would do it. Until then, third parties can go fuck themselves. |
|
(1581869) | |
Re: The worst possible outcome? |
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 12 21:26:24 2018, in response to Re: The worst possible outcome?, posted by Fred G on Wed Dec 12 16:09:20 2018. +1 to your infinity= Moar ∞. |
|
(1582137) | |
Re: The worst possible outcome? |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 13 23:56:56 2018, in response to Re: The worst possible outcome?, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Dec 9 19:50:09 2018. So tax evasion and financial fraud are non-crimes? Figures. |
|
(1582138) | |
Re: The worst possible outcome? |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Dec 13 23:58:45 2018, in response to Re: The worst possible outcome?, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Dec 10 11:54:08 2018. 45 states or hundreds of millions of people.Of course you side with legal entities over human beings. Corporate persons are more important to you than natural persons. |
|
Page 4 of 4 |