Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 4

Next Page >  

(1458874)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 22 17:44:39 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 17:28:41 2017.

I did not state anything of the kind. I stated A FACT. If you want, you can try to prove me wrong by quoting the appropriate clause in the Constitution. Beyond that, let's not try to play the same game AlM likes to play.

Post a New Response

(1458875)

view threaded

Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history

Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Aug 22 17:47:01 2017, in response to Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 17:12:26 2017.

Potatoes aren't a "brain food."

That's debatable. Glucose as an energy source might be great for the brain. Some people believe that Asians also evolved with high IQ's because they ate white rice.

Potatoes specifically might not be a "brain food" but glucose in general might be, and could help explain evolutionary developments in humans who added them or increased intake of starchy carbs.


Post a New Response

(1458876)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 17:47:55 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 22 17:44:39 2017.

An irrelevant fact given that the Bill of Rights does not grant rights.

Post a New Response

(1458877)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by ClearAspect on Tue Aug 22 17:49:21 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 17:43:09 2017.

True but thats my vote for most likely candidate to discover the Americas.

Post a New Response

(1458879)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Aug 22 17:51:31 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 22 17:44:39 2017.

let's not try to play the same game AlM likes to play.




Post a New Response

(1458882)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 17:58:48 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Aug 22 17:49:21 2017.

By 1492 the Vikings were gone.

Post a New Response

(1458884)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by ClearAspect on Tue Aug 22 17:59:57 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 17:58:48 2017.

Scandinavians.... ?

Post a New Response

(1458886)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by AlM on Tue Aug 22 18:07:03 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 17:26:48 2017.

A bunch of countries had spare money. The idea of exploring for new business opportunities would have continued. Someone pretty soon would have sprung for the money to find out what happens if you just sail west.


Post a New Response

(1458892)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 22 18:29:51 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Aug 22 17:51:31 2017.

The Times of London cryptic crosswords are the real headaches.



Post a New Response

(1458893)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 22 18:30:47 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 22 17:09:06 2017.

And never will be.

Post a New Response

(1458894)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Fred G on Tue Aug 22 18:31:08 2017, in response to Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 07:59:49 2017.

yes and the advanced Union Army kicked ass on the Confederacy and only dumbasses erect statues to losers so time to get rid of them.

Post a New Response

(1458900)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Aug 22 19:19:57 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 17:47:55 2017.

I stated what I stated. Your original comment was incorrect.

Post a New Response

(1458902)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 19:42:38 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Fred G on Tue Aug 22 18:31:08 2017.

The original comment isn't about this.

Post a New Response

(1458903)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 19:43:47 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 17:26:48 2017.

The Irish and the Vikings were already here. Probrably Polynesians too.

Post a New Response

(1458904)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 19:44:57 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Aug 22 17:38:59 2017.

The Irish monks on tge,St. Brendan boat did it first. Before the Vikings

Post a New Response

(1458905)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Fred G on Tue Aug 22 19:55:16 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 19:42:38 2017.

Which brings me to this whole statue issue.

oh?

Post a New Response

(1458906)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by ClearAspect on Tue Aug 22 19:56:40 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 19:44:57 2017.

That is hotly contested as there is 0 archelogical evidence of St Brendan making it to America. Much like the story of St Patrick reality from legend is blurred.

Post a New Response

(1458907)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 20:44:31 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Aug 22 17:59:57 2017.

The descendants of the Vikings but no longer Vikings.

Post a New Response

(1458910)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 20:46:11 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Aug 22 19:56:40 2017.

To be fair, the idea of the Vikings landing in America was discounted until the site at L'Anse aux Meadows was found.

Post a New Response

(1458913)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by ClearAspect on Tue Aug 22 21:01:44 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 20:46:11 2017.

Thats why I said contested. But lets be honest, America was discovered thanks to the land/ice bridge between Russia and America thousands of years ago =p

Post a New Response

(1458922)

view threaded

Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history

Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 22 22:22:01 2017, in response to Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 14:41:39 2017.

Then don,t make such a generalzed statement about "western culture" which encompasses some two thousandish years.

Post a New Response

(1458927)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 22 22:26:15 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Aug 22 15:22:04 2017.

Hell, it was declared a basic human right on ths very day.....in 1864. The International Order of the Red Cross, established on this day, did that.

Post a New Response

(1458929)

view threaded

Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:28:37 2017, in response to Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 22 22:22:01 2017.

Well, the fact stands thst western culture is the world's premier culture.

Post a New Response

(1458930)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:30:22 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by ClearAspect on Tue Aug 22 19:56:40 2017.

Just because they didn't stay and leave behind anything, doesn't mean it didn't happen. We have NO way to prove or disprove it.

Post a New Response

(1458931)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 22 22:30:23 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 15:55:14 2017.

No, you won't.

Post a New Response

(1458932)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:31:35 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 20:44:31 2017.

Only a small percentage of Scandinavians were Vikings.

Post a New Response

(1458933)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 22 22:32:09 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:31:35 2017.

Also true.

Post a New Response

(1458934)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:32:39 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 22 22:30:23 2017.

Then I'll be a cripple! I'll change my handle to BILLCRIPPLE.

Post a New Response

(1458936)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:34:19 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 16:09:03 2017.

No one took the bait I see!

Post a New Response

(1458938)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Fred G on Tue Aug 22 22:38:53 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:30:22 2017.

We have NO way to prove or disprove it.

sounds like end of discussion.

Post a New Response

(1458939)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:44:03 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Fred G on Tue Aug 22 22:38:53 2017.

So, that's that then? You "subchat element" are something else!

Post a New Response

(1458941)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:48:21 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Fred G on Tue Aug 22 19:55:16 2017.

Yes, go back and reread. It's about the statue of Columbus, NOT any civil war ststues.

Post a New Response

(1458951)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by SMAZ on Wed Aug 23 04:36:23 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Aug 22 11:07:37 2017.

You only get to be technologically advanced by being morally advanced.



Post a New Response

(1458956)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Fred G on Wed Aug 23 06:28:30 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:44:03 2017.

Anybody sensible would end the discussion there based on lack of evidence but you'll keep going and try to convince us with your expertise by ego 👶🏼

Post a New Response

(1458962)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by AlM on Wed Aug 23 08:36:17 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:30:22 2017.

So perhaps the Arabs got there before St. Brendan. They were pretty adventurous.





Post a New Response

(1458968)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Aug 23 09:27:18 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by Fred G on Wed Aug 23 06:28:30 2017.

But here's how stupid your comment is. I never said it was fact, go back and reread what I said! The bottom line is we weren't around for ancient events, so every argument then has no proof!

Post a New Response

(1458970)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Aug 23 09:29:21 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by AlM on Wed Aug 23 08:36:17 2017.

I never heard that theory before, I would have to look into it but you know what? The Barbary Coast Arabs did indeed master the sea as well

Post a New Response

(1458971)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 10:06:45 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:32:39 2017.

Don,t expect anyone would be willing to help.

Post a New Response

(1458975)

view threaded

Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history

Posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 10:10:32 2017, in response to Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 22 22:28:37 2017.

Not exacctly. If given a choice, I'd rather be a Pacific Islander. The west is almost as cruel as fundamentalist Islamic enclaves to women.

Post a New Response

(1458976)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 10:14:25 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Aug 23 09:27:18 2017.

The only knowledge we have of "ancient events" is the record of what remains, ruins and the limited written record. In other words, it's EVIDENCE BASED.. Exclusively. Entirely.

Post a New Response

(1458981)

view threaded

Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Aug 23 10:42:24 2017, in response to Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history, posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 10:10:32 2017.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Pacific Islanders are the fattest people.

Post a New Response

(1458984)

view threaded

Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history

Posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 11:16:00 2017, in response to Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Aug 23 10:42:24 2017.

Only lately. They are also among the happiest. It's all a question of what you think is important.

Post a New Response

(1458988)

view threaded

Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Aug 23 11:40:09 2017, in response to Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Aug 23 10:42:24 2017.

AND, they are supposed to have the biggest penises.

Post a New Response

(1458990)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Aug 23 11:44:17 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 10:14:25 2017.

And SOME is folklore as well.

Post a New Response

(1458992)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Aug 23 11:47:03 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 10:06:45 2017.

That's ok, I have medical bennies!

Post a New Response

(1458993)

view threaded

Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Aug 23 11:48:48 2017, in response to Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history, posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 11:16:00 2017.

Health is very important and fat is not healthy.

Post a New Response

(1459004)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 13:05:38 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Aug 23 11:44:17 2017.

Which remains fiction, and thus belongs outside this discussion.

Post a New Response

(1459005)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 13:06:52 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by BILLBKLYN on Wed Aug 23 11:47:03 2017.

Now, maybe.

Who knows what a trump future holds. All that we can surmise is that it isn't good.

Post a New Response

(1459006)

view threaded

Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history

Posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 13:07:32 2017, in response to Re: Nature with Billbklyns wrong history, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Aug 23 11:48:48 2017.

It's also not necessarily harmful.

Post a New Response

(1459008)

view threaded

Re: Nature

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Aug 23 13:17:14 2017, in response to Re: Nature, posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 23 13:05:38 2017.

Folklore is NOT fiction. Some of it is based in reality and those stories which are more plausible and supported by the archaeological record can be taken into account.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 4

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]