|
|
| Re: Womens March in washington dc (1413962) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 5 of 5 |
||
|
| (1414221) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Jan 22 10:07:24 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by bingbong on Sat Jan 21 22:54:22 2017. Best estimates I heard are 720,000 for inauguration and 500,000 for Saturday. But the interior department no longer takes these counts. All anyone can do is aerial photos, use formulas, and WMATA turnstile counts. |
|
|
| (1414222) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Jan 22 10:08:31 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Jan 21 22:17:08 2017. They also sell breast exams. Should we ban those too ? |
|
|
| (1414225) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Sun Jan 22 10:35:17 2017, in response to Womens March in washington dc, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Jan 21 13:02:50 2017. Yea, why are the women carrying signs concerned about mens rights? |
|
|
| (1414230) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Jan 22 11:06:49 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by ntrainride on Sun Jan 22 00:32:14 2017. Fetuside |
|
|
| (1414246) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 12:51:27 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 01:52:03 2017. Because the electoral college is (not deliberately, it’s over 200 years old) rigged in favor of people who put party before country. |
|
|
| (1414248) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 12:54:43 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by ntrainride on Sun Jan 22 01:43:17 2017. How do you figure that? It’s just a euphemism. Like “pro-life” is a euphemism for “anti-legal-abortion” and “pro-choice” for “pro-legal-abortion.” |
|
|
| (1414249) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Jan 22 12:55:18 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 12:51:27 2017. If that were the case, the partisan Democrats would always win too, as they always put party first.They win some elections, the right wins some. |
|
|
| (1414251) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Jan 22 12:56:09 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 00:32:53 2017. Trump isn't going after "birth control" or "Abortion".Or gay rights for that matter. |
|
|
| (1414254) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Jan 22 12:58:12 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by R2Chinatown on Sat Jan 21 20:21:29 2017. You are natural born moron, hardly a means of calling bullshit on anyone.Here are some facts for you to digest: http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/08/05/429641062/fact-check-how-does-planned-parenthood-spend-that-government-money https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/08/12/for-planned-parenthood-abortion-stats-3-percent-and-94-percent-are-both-misleading/?utm_term=.5c35c3ff46bc |
|
|
| (1414260) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 13:25:34 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Joe V on Sun Jan 22 09:58:48 2017. LOL! Luch is not 25. He’s older than I am and I haven’t been 25 for quite some time. |
|
|
| (1414262) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 13:31:30 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Jan 22 11:06:49 2017. Most abortions involve the abortions of embryos. |
|
|
| (1414264) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 13:34:44 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Jan 22 12:55:18 2017. No. As I’ve stated a hundred times already, if Donald Trump ran as a Democrat (with appropriately different views expressed on the campaign) and Ted Cruz ran as a Republican, I’d vote for Cruz and I’d volunteer for his campaign.I choose Cruz for this example because he was one of the more orthodox Republicans in this election cycle. It works for literally any one of the other candidates in 2016. |
|
|
| (1414265) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Jan 22 13:35:36 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 13:34:44 2017. But that is YOU. |
|
|
| (1414268) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 13:38:19 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Jan 22 13:35:36 2017. A lot of Democrats would agree with me. Except of course, for the left-wing Sanderistas who stayed home. |
|
|
| (1414276) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Jan 22 14:02:23 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by Nilet on Sun Jan 22 03:53:11 2017. iawtp |
|
|
| (1414279) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Jan 22 15:28:30 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 13:25:34 2017. I made a mistake. I meant that for someone else. Too many threads here in the tree. I lost track. |
|
|
| (1414287) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jan 22 16:08:27 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Jan 22 14:02:23 2017. You have a clue to what he's talking about? |
|
|
| (1414288) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Jan 22 16:09:22 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jan 22 16:08:27 2017. yeahok |
|
|
| (1414289) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 16:09:25 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jan 22 16:08:27 2017. He doesn't, but I do. |
|
|
| (1414290) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 16:33:34 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jan 22 16:08:27 2017. Cicero |
|
|
| (1414291) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jan 22 16:34:11 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 16:09:25 2017. OK. What is it? |
|
|
| (1414292) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Jan 22 16:35:09 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Joe V on Sat Jan 21 16:10:11 2017. Menopause and its side affects - the concept does not exist.False |
|
|
| (1414293) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jan 22 16:35:57 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 16:33:34 2017. Next time you're in Chicago, I know this good Mexican restaurant in Cicero at the end of the Pink line we can summit. |
|
|
| (1414294) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 16:38:25 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jan 22 16:35:57 2017. If AAA runs another show at Cicero Stadium I'm going. |
|
|
| (1414295) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Sun Jan 22 16:40:50 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Dave on Sun Jan 22 16:35:09 2017. Correct, but to a completely different degree. |
|
|
| (1414296) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 17:01:25 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jan 22 16:34:11 2017. Olog-hai has a habit of putting question marks at the end of subject lines that he disagrees with, even where the subject line is a factual statement. Nilet is making fun of that tactic. |
|
|
| (1414299) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jan 22 17:07:54 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 16:38:25 2017. You're on. |
|
|
| (1414300) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jan 22 17:08:26 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 17:01:25 2017. A Ha! |
|
|
| (1414303) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 17:17:12 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jan 22 17:07:54 2017. there are Lucha shows in Villa Park and Berwyn today.Have you been to those towns? |
|
|
| (1414308) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by Chicagomotorman on Sun Jan 22 17:37:36 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc?, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 17:17:12 2017. Of course. I'm not a hermit. |
|
|
| (1414333) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sun Jan 22 20:09:38 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Joe V on Sun Jan 22 15:28:30 2017. Who did you mean that for then? |
|
|
| (1414378) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Sun Jan 22 23:48:23 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 13:38:19 2017. I was a left wing Sanderista and if Trump was somehow the (D) I'd have voted for Cruz, especially towards the end. Cruz would have also gotten many of the votes that ended up in Johnson's column. The only thing Cruz had going against him that fit with Trump's "campaign style" were:1. Canadian! (*yawn* not the birther thing again) 2. New York Values comment! (I would have looked past that seeing how the final months of Trump's campaign unfolded). 3. His face makes you want to punch it! (I'll admit I would have had to abstain from watching any televised debates to see past that). However they would have also played up his Tea Party obstructionism which would have kept a not-small contigent of Democrats from crossing the aisle. That said it would have been 100% impossible for Trump to win the Democratic primary this cycle. |
|
|
| (1414381) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 23 00:02:37 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Sun Jan 22 23:48:23 2017. I’d have voted for Ted Cruz (R) over Al Sharpton (D). |
|
|
| (1414390) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Mon Jan 23 00:44:35 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Jan 22 12:56:09 2017. He's got Pence and Sessions to do it for him. |
|
|
| (1414428) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 23 09:13:22 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Jan 22 12:56:09 2017. Trump isn't going after "birth control" or "Abortion".Not right now. He just became president. But he has promised that he will. - He has promised to support massive restrictions on the ability of low income women in red states to get abortions. - He has promised to remove the obligation of medical insurance companies to pay for birth control as part of their basic coverage. Of course, if you take the attitude that all Trump promises are lies, then your statement is correct. |
|
|
| (1414429) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 23 09:17:11 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 23 00:02:37 2017. Ouch. That would have been a difficult one.However, the proof that the Democrats are more responsible than the Republicans is that Gold Standard Cruz had a chance to win the Republican nomination whereas Al Sharpton would never ever have won the Democratic nomination. |
|
|
|
Page 5 of 5 |
||