|
|
| Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. (1413962) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 5 |
||
|
| (1414138) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Jan 21 23:05:01 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by bingbong on Sat Jan 21 22:53:14 2017. Post quotes where he said that or i call BINGBONG BULLSHIT |
|
|
| (1414139) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sat Jan 21 23:06:42 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Jan 21 23:00:38 2017. Which is Why I say fuck em. |
|
|
| (1414140) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Jan 21 23:07:16 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:03:18 2017. She can barely spell it |
|
|
| (1414141) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Jan 21 23:08:13 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Edwards! on Sat Jan 21 23:06:42 2017. One this issue we agree |
|
|
| (1414142) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:08:14 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Jan 21 22:12:58 2017. I don’t when Yrump said it, because I don’t know who that is, but Trump said that in November: http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/14/politics/trump-gay-marriage-abortion-supreme-court/ |
|
|
| (1414143) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:08:57 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Catfish 44 on Sat Jan 21 22:13:06 2017. Essentially yes. With his Supreme Court appointments.May Ruth Bader Ginsburg live 120 years! |
|
|
| (1414144) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sat Jan 21 23:15:15 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:08:57 2017. Eh. We have checks and balances. |
|
|
| (1414146) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:18:34 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Catfish 44 on Sat Jan 21 23:15:15 2017. The Senate will rubber-stamp any anti-Roe appointee that Trump may appoint. What checks and balances are there on the Supreme Court overturning their own prior decision? |
|
|
| (1414148) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sat Jan 21 23:26:20 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:18:34 2017. Stop it |
|
|
| (1414149) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:26:45 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Catfish 44 on Sat Jan 21 23:26:20 2017. Stop what? These are facts. |
|
|
| (1414150) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sat Jan 21 23:29:29 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:26:45 2017. Facts? It hasn't happened yet. |
|
|
| (1414151) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:40:33 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Catfish 44 on Sat Jan 21 23:29:29 2017. Of course it hasn’t happened yet? Who said it has? But it is a fact that the president wants to appoint anti-Roe justices. |
|
|
| (1414152) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sat Jan 21 23:45:14 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:40:33 2017. You said the Senate will rubber stamp any anti-Roe appointee that Trump appoints and claimed it as fact. The president can appoint anyone he or she wants thats not a guarantee of anything in terms of acceptance. |
|
|
| (1414153) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Jan 21 23:45:19 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by bingbong on Sat Jan 21 22:26:26 2017. iawtp |
|
|
| (1414154) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Jan 21 23:46:16 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by bingbong on Sat Jan 21 22:47:21 2017. iawtp |
|
|
| (1414155) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Jan 21 23:46:38 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by bingbong on Sat Jan 21 22:54:22 2017. iawtp |
|
|
| (1414156) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Jan 21 23:51:51 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by R2ChinaTown on Sat Jan 21 22:17:08 2017. you are the BS |
|
|
| (1414157) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:58:12 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Catfish 44 on Sat Jan 21 23:45:14 2017. It is a fact. The Senate wants anti-Roe justices more than the President does. Unless you think a few Republicans will decide to oppose any such nominee. |
|
|
| (1414158) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 00:14:02 2017, in response to Womens March in washington dc, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Jan 21 13:02:50 2017. attractive women at MMA in LA.ugly women at rallies. a woman's looks influences her politics. |
|
|
| (1414159) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by ntrainride on Sun Jan 22 00:19:19 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by bingbong on Sat Jan 21 22:53:14 2017. ahh. apparent vehemence of faith and piquency of expression. |
|
|
| (1414160) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 00:21:10 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 23:58:12 2017. It hasn't happened yet and that's the point. Nothing is a given. |
|
|
| (1414161) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 00:23:50 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 00:14:02 2017. In all fairness those dames at MMA don't know what they're doing there either.The looks thing has long been a valid argument though. |
|
|
| (1414162) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 00:27:35 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 00:23:50 2017. the women who go to MMA are looking for alpha male types to hook up with. They are putting themselves in male space hoping to be noticed.MMA is a great way for women to meet men. |
|
|
| (1414163) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 00:31:47 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 00:21:10 2017. What’s possible (but I’m not holding my breath) is that he may appoint a more moderate justice. |
|
|
| (1414164) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 00:32:00 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 00:27:35 2017. Just like protests are good for lesbians. |
|
|
| (1414165) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by ntrainride on Sun Jan 22 00:32:14 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by bingbong on Sat Jan 21 22:26:34 2017. what are "reproductive rights"? |
|
|
| (1414166) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 00:32:53 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by ntrainride on Sun Jan 22 00:32:14 2017. Abortion and birth control. |
|
|
| (1414167) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 00:32:59 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 00:31:47 2017. We'll have to wait and see. |
|
|
| (1414168) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 00:41:14 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 00:32:00 2017. yup.they love Slut Walk in Toronto. |
|
|
| (1414170) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 00:52:42 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 00:41:14 2017. hahhahaha |
|
|
| (1414172) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 00:54:16 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 00:52:42 2017. Slut Walk is a feminist rally in Toronto.It has been taken over by lesbians looking to hook up. |
|
|
| (1414173) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 00:54:46 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 00:54:16 2017. Just unreal |
|
|
| (1414174) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 00:59:08 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 00:54:46 2017. it's the kind of place where cortelyounext would fit right in.On my end I did go to church today but left before mass. The Left is very angry and violent. |
|
|
| (1414175) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 01:02:21 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 00:59:08 2017. I'm going to church in the morning. I'll pray for their anger and violence. |
|
|
| (1414176) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 01:04:39 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 01:02:21 2017. are you Catholic? |
|
|
| (1414178) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 01:14:26 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Jan 22 01:04:39 2017. 100% |
|
|
| (1414179) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Jan 22 01:30:34 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Edwards! on Sat Jan 21 22:56:11 2017. This man spewed hateful rhetoric, insulted everyone who isn't a white male his way into the WH and ppl wonder why there's such a syrong reaction to his winning. Unbelievable. |
|
|
| (1414183) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by ntrainride on Sun Jan 22 01:43:17 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 00:32:53 2017. that phrase, it's like calling a blindfold sunglasses. |
|
|
| (1414184) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 01:52:03 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Jan 22 01:30:34 2017. How did he win an election if all that is so true? |
|
|
| (1414185) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Jan 22 01:53:49 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 01:52:03 2017. If Obama was the great divider how did he win 2 elections? |
|
|
| (1414186) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 02:16:42 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Jan 22 01:53:49 2017. Did I say that? |
|
|
| (1414193) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Jan 22 03:04:40 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 02:16:42 2017. No but the poster i responded to did. You responded to my response to him (sounds confusing) |
|
|
| (1414195) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Sun Jan 22 03:08:29 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by ftgreeneg on Sun Jan 22 03:04:40 2017. 10_4 |
|
|
| (1414196) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by ntrainride on Sun Jan 22 03:48:39 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by bingbong on Sat Jan 21 18:51:24 2017. zero? poor analysis of available data. |
|
|
| (1414199) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Sun Jan 22 03:53:11 2017, in response to Womens March in washington dc, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Jan 21 13:02:50 2017. It never happened. That is the power of Olog's Magic Question Mark |
|
|
| (1414211) | |
Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C. |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Jan 22 05:23:39 2017, in response to Re: Women's March in Washington, D.C., posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 22 00:31:47 2017. The next justices will be chosen by Prime Minister Pence who is a wingnut of the worst kind. |
|
|
| (1414212) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Jan 22 05:31:16 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Jan 21 17:37:15 2017. I'm hoping to hear from that guy who worshiped Ugly Betty. |
|
|
| (1414214) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Jan 22 08:06:53 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Edwards! on Sat Jan 21 22:27:35 2017. Good post. |
|
|
| (1414218) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Jan 22 09:58:48 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Edwards! on Sat Jan 21 22:27:35 2017. He's only 25. You'd think he were 75. But a bitter wretch nonetheless.He even once tried to blame his high school property taxes on Obama and Core Curriculum. Imagine that - if we only stopped teaching Trig in 11th or 12th grade, we could get rid of all those math teachers. |
|
|
| (1414220) | |
Re: Womens March in washington dc |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Sun Jan 22 10:02:54 2017, in response to Re: Womens March in washington dc, posted by Edwards! on Sat Jan 21 22:28:55 2017. Sean Spicer came out and threw a hissy fit at the media yesterday about crowd totals, offering no proof. He came across as a incompetent Junior High School principal yelling at students. That does not work in the adult world. The media can take Trump's approval rating down to the 20's in short order, and with this war or words, they likely will.As for R2Chinatown, he's one of them, perhaps a Sean Hannity wannabe. |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 5 |
||