Could This Be True (1408861) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
(1408861) | |
Could This Be True |
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Mon Dec 5 03:04:54 2016 In 3 days of recounting in Wisconsin, Hillary has lost more than 18,000 votes. Why, yes it is true. |
|
(1408864) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by Dave on Mon Dec 5 07:15:58 2016, in response to Could This Be True, posted by R2Chinatown on Mon Dec 5 03:04:54 2016. |
|
(1408871) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Dec 5 08:58:52 2016, in response to Could This Be True, posted by R2Chinatown on Mon Dec 5 03:04:54 2016. In checking voter eligibility, how many illegal aliens did they find on the voter rolls? |
|
(1408873) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by Kevin from Midwood on Mon Dec 5 09:40:32 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by AlM on Mon Dec 5 08:58:52 2016. What he wrote is untrue to begin with. |
|
(1408875) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Dec 5 10:27:20 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by Kevin from Midwood on Mon Dec 5 09:40:32 2016. Not surprising. |
|
(1408883) | |
Re: Could This Be Fake News |
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Dec 5 10:59:37 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by Kevin from Midwood on Mon Dec 5 09:40:32 2016. What he wrote is untrue to begin with.Haha, thanks. |
|
(1408916) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Mon Dec 5 13:22:50 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by Kevin from Midwood on Mon Dec 5 09:40:32 2016. Ha! Pwn3d! |
|
(1408917) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Mon Dec 5 13:23:02 2016, in response to Could This Be True, posted by R2Chinatown on Mon Dec 5 03:04:54 2016. Bad move. |
|
(1408920) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Mon Dec 5 13:31:23 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by AlM on Mon Dec 5 08:58:52 2016. Why just focus on illegals? |
|
(1408921) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by SLRT on Mon Dec 5 13:36:13 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by AlM on Mon Dec 5 08:58:52 2016. Who said they're checking voter eligibility in recounts? Besides it would be southwestern states, NY and California and places with big illegal populations that would prove voter eligibility one way or the other. |
|
(1408929) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Dec 5 14:08:02 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by SLRT on Mon Dec 5 13:36:13 2016. If there are millions of illegal aliens voting in CA, there must be thousands in WI. |
|
(1408933) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Dec 5 14:11:01 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by AlM on Mon Dec 5 14:08:02 2016. Perhaps, but probably not 10's of thousands. |
|
(1408941) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by SLRT on Mon Dec 5 14:46:40 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by AlM on Mon Dec 5 14:08:02 2016. And even if they were inclined to check the eligibility of voters, they couldn't do that as part of the counting; secret ballot, remember? |
|
(1408942) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Dec 5 14:57:39 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by SLRT on Mon Dec 5 14:46:40 2016. So you're saying that the general process known as a "recount" never includes any examination of the population that voted and whether there were significant numbers of ineligible voters?Obviously if one were to find a significant population of ineligible voters one would not be able to correlate them with actual votes cast. Oddly enough, I do understand that. |
|
(1408943) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by SLRT on Mon Dec 5 15:31:05 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by AlM on Mon Dec 5 14:57:39 2016. As to your first paragraph, I doubt it unless they were specifically asked to check that, and then they would have to figure out a methodology. The records would hardly say "citizen" or "non-citizen."As to your second, exactly. |
|
(1408958) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Mon Dec 5 18:15:21 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be True, posted by terRAPIN station on Mon Dec 5 13:23:02 2016. Why is it a bad move? When the story reached my Facebook page, it sounded ridiculous. I thought that the intent of my second sentence would be clear, even without the seljerk like [ :) ]. I guess not. |
|
(1408960) | |
Re: Could This Be True |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Dec 5 18:17:04 2016, in response to Re: Could This Be Fake News, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Dec 5 10:59:37 2016. It ain't from the left-wing media, so how can it be untrue? |
|