Home ∑ Maps ∑ About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

(1400039)

view threaded

Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Oct 27 21:49:15 2016

fiogf49gjkf0d
Of seizing a federal wildlife refuge and fire arm charges.

Post a New Response

(1400050)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Oct 27 23:48:21 2016, in response to Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Oct 27 21:49:15 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
They're still holding them on the Nevada charges. And they tased the Bundys' lawyer.

Post a New Response

(1400066)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Dave on Fri Oct 28 07:26:02 2016, in response to Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Oct 27 21:49:15 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I loved how the prosecutor introduced into evidence over 30 guns and more than 16,000 rounds of ammunition, and the jury acquitted the Bundys of illegal possession of firearms in a federal facility. LOL!

Post a New Response

(1400068)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by AlM on Fri Oct 28 08:30:13 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Dave on Fri Oct 28 07:26:02 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Heh. That's the jury's right, bizarre as it sometimes turns out.



Post a New Response

(1400098)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 28 10:55:24 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Dave on Fri Oct 28 07:26:02 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That's because per the Second Amendment, it is not illegal or unconstitutional; but having such "federal facilit(ies)" is.

Post a New Response

(1400101)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Oct 28 10:59:51 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 28 10:55:24 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL!

Post a New Response

(1400201)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Dave on Fri Oct 28 22:17:43 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Oct 28 10:59:51 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
IAWTP.

Post a New Response

(1400207)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 28 22:29:23 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Dave on Fri Oct 28 22:17:43 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Looks like you need to brush up on the Constitution too. Especially Article 2; please find the authorization, or the permission, for the executive branch to acquire such large swaths of land for itself.

Post a New Response

(1400212)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Dave on Fri Oct 28 22:49:32 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 28 22:29:23 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL!

Post a New Response

(1400213)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 29 00:08:36 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Dave on Fri Oct 28 22:49:32 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
IAWTLOL!

Post a New Response

(1400214)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 29 00:09:01 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Oct 28 22:29:23 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Itís in Article I, idiot.

Post a New Response

(1400216)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 29 01:06:19 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Dave on Fri Oct 28 22:49:32 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
OK, don't. (BTW, that is ad lapidem.)

Post a New Response

(1400217)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 29 01:10:33 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 29 00:09:01 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No it is not, liar. Everything in Article I has to do with Congress and not the executive branch. And the Tenth Amendment forbids them from empowering the executive branch beyond its remit.

You make salaam look like a genius, on this score.

Post a New Response

(1400233)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 29 10:50:16 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 29 01:10:33 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You clearly know nothing about the Constitution.

Post a New Response

(1400237)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by AlM on Sat Oct 29 10:56:41 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 29 01:10:33 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Bummer for you that the entire Supreme Court, including the late Justice Scalia, disagrees with you.


Post a New Response

(1400238)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by bingbong on Sat Oct 29 11:05:31 2016, in response to Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Oct 27 21:49:15 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
They should still face charges of destruction of Federal property, which was rampant during their occupation of a Federal facility. And they'll see sentences at the max for it, like an OJ Simpson treatment.

Those guys deseve to be in prison for a long long time. Violent occupation of Federal property should never be handled lightly. Conspiracy is hard to prove. Armed insurrection is much easier. These are dangerous people and they belong in prison, so society is safe from them.

Post a New Response

(1400251)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 29 14:32:10 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 29 10:50:16 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL! Knew you wouldn't be able to find what you claimed was in Article I, because it ain't there.

Only takes being able to read to see that nothing about the executive branch is in Article I. Especially anything about Congress giving the executive the equivalent of "King's Lands".

Why do you hate the USA so much?

Post a New Response

(1400254)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 29 14:56:05 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 29 14:32:10 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You are full of shit.

I'd respond to your points, but I'd rather not. If a more reasonable poster had some questions about the Constitution, I'd answer them. But responding to you is as ridiculous as Bill Nye debating Ken Ham.

Post a New Response

(1400263)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 29 17:50:46 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 29 14:56:05 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL, it's OK to admit you can't prove your contention. (Never mind piling on more ad lapidem to boot.) You'll feel better admitting it.

Post a New Response

(1400288)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 29 20:41:41 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 29 17:50:46 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I donít need to give proof of its absurdity. The post started with Posted by Olog-hai. . .

Post a New Response

(1400320)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by TerrApin Station on Sun Oct 30 01:35:58 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 29 20:41:41 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Pwn3d

Post a New Response

(1400325)

view threaded

Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 30 02:56:46 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Oct 29 20:41:41 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Repeat of ad lapidem with ad hominem. Two logical fallacies in a row! You're 0 for 4 at least.

Post a New Response

(1400326)

view threaded

Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 30 02:57:07 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by TerrApin Station on Sun Oct 30 01:35:58 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
There's no pwn4ge in logical fallacies, antisemite.

Post a New Response

(1400339)

view threaded

Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside

Posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 30 09:03:28 2016, in response to Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 30 02:57:07 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Says the one who likes nazis

Post a New Response

(1400345)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Mitch45 on Sun Oct 30 09:58:36 2016, in response to Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Oct 27 21:49:15 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Can we get a WHOA BUNDY?

Post a New Response

(1400352)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Oct 30 11:02:23 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by Mitch45 on Sun Oct 30 09:58:36 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d


Post a New Response

(1400353)

view threaded

Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 30 11:07:24 2016, in response to Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside, posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 30 09:03:28 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That'd be you who likes Nazis, tough guy. Insisting that they are what they are not (on the right) is the definition of liking them.

Post a New Response

(1400354)

view threaded

Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 30 11:08:10 2016, in response to Re: Bundy Brothers Acquitted, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Oct 30 11:02:23 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Heh, more cheers for statism.

Post a New Response

(1400379)

view threaded

Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside

Posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 30 14:01:56 2016, in response to Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 30 11:07:24 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Horrible try, you try to turn things into nazi arguments when you have nothing to use innyour discussion. Stick to your knowledge of the communist constitution cause you have NO knowledge of the American One

Post a New Response

(1400381)

view threaded

Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 30 14:05:43 2016, in response to Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside, posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 30 14:01:56 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
PWN3D!

Post a New Response

(1400530)

view threaded

Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside

Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Mon Oct 31 03:30:45 2016, in response to Re: Lib media op-ed: Democratic Party should ask Hillary to step aside, posted by ClearAspect on Sun Oct 30 14:01:56 2016.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Good one!

Post a New Response


[ Return to the Message Index ]