|
|
| Hilary vindicated ?? (1369214) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
| (1369215) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Wed May 25 20:27:55 2016, in response to Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Dutchrailnut on Wed May 25 20:21:18 2016. Holy sh*t, wrong forum, Batman. And no, that doesn't vindicate her. It just shows that she follows in a line of idiots. |
|
|
| (1369216) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Wed May 25 20:32:23 2016, in response to Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Dutchrailnut on Wed May 25 20:21:18 2016. I still wouldn't vote for her at gunpoint. |
|
|
| (1369217) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by Dutchrailnut on Wed May 25 20:34:05 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Wed May 25 20:32:23 2016. Ok so vote for Drumf. and see were that will get you ?? |
|
|
| (1369218) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 25 20:36:39 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Wed May 25 20:32:23 2016. So you're voting for Il Douche? |
|
|
| (1369219) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Wed May 25 20:57:38 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 25 20:36:39 2016. Yep. SubChat.com has a lot of winners. |
|
|
| (1369220) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by brightonr68 on Wed May 25 23:38:33 2016, in response to Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Dutchrailnut on Wed May 25 20:21:18 2016. All that says is no of them are fit to be president . Hilary is Deblasio in a pants suit. She sets policy to who ever pays the most.Criminal charges are stil pending |
|
|
| (1369221) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by brightonr68 on Wed May 25 23:43:32 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Dutchrailnut on Wed May 25 20:34:05 2016. Hillary is a liar plain and simple and liars can never be trusted. Go google 13 minutes of Hillary lies. She bold face lies about what she stands for on a daily basis. Remember the Clintons in Hillarys words were flat broke when they left the white house. They did not start getting large speaking fees from big companies and hostile government with repressive womens rights records until she became secretary of state. Then presto hundreds of thousands of dollars per speech.Her support for the Kesyston XL pipeline changed after Bill got paid $1 million to give a speech to TD bank, one of the partners in the pipeline. At this time Trump is a much better choice . Anyone who rights a check will get thier way. What she says never can be believed |
|
|
| (1369222) | |
Re: HSWF |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu May 26 00:32:52 2016, in response to Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Dutchrailnut on Wed May 25 20:21:18 2016. LOL, that's not vindication. |
|
|
| (1369223) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu May 26 05:44:39 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by brightonr68 on Wed May 25 23:43:32 2016. You are a fool. |
|
|
| (1369224) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Thu May 26 08:45:57 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu May 26 05:44:39 2016. Yep. |
|
|
| (1369225) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by chud1 on Thu May 26 10:06:10 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Wed May 25 20:32:23 2016. IAWTP!hillary has been in trouble since watergate. chud1. |
|
|
| (1369226) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Thu May 26 10:06:59 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu May 26 05:44:39 2016. Only a fool would support Hillary. Trump might not be the bargain that I was looking for (LION being a fan of Ben Carson). But him is the far better choice compared to the Socialists.ROAR |
|
|
| (1369227) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by chud1 on Thu May 26 10:08:56 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by brightonr68 on Wed May 25 23:43:32 2016. IAWTP!chud1. :)..... |
|
|
| (1369228) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by chud1 on Thu May 26 10:14:11 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Broadway Lion on Thu May 26 10:06:59 2016. IAWTP!chud1. :)..... |
|
|
| (1369229) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu May 26 10:16:42 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Broadway Lion on Thu May 26 10:06:59 2016. So you prefer fascism to socialism? I don't. |
|
|
| (1369230) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu May 26 10:36:24 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by chud1 on Thu May 26 10:06:10 2016. Shouldn't you also be drooling like a typical Trumpenproletarian? |
|
|
| (1369231) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu May 26 10:48:31 2016, in response to Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Dutchrailnut on Wed May 25 20:21:18 2016. Yup. You are rapidly approaching genius level. Keep sqeezing your butt cheeks together. |
|
|
| (1369232) | |
Re: HSWF |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu May 26 11:11:06 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu May 26 10:48:31 2016. A true railfan takes pictures and leaves only footprints . . . and doesn't post political stuff in Subchat. |
|
|
| (1369238) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Thu May 26 13:32:08 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Broadway Lion on Thu May 26 10:06:59 2016. Hillary Clinton? Socialist?? The one everyone accuses of being a shill for Wall Street and big banks? |
|
|
| (1369239) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Thu May 26 13:34:26 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by brightonr68 on Wed May 25 23:43:32 2016. So you're accusing her of lying because the Clintons worked their way back to financial solvency? *smh* |
|
|
| (1369246) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu May 26 14:15:10 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by 3-9 on Thu May 26 13:32:08 2016. If you support Sanders, she's a banker. If you support Trump, she's a socialist.It's amazing there's anyone left in this country with any sense. |
|
|
| (1369248) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu May 26 14:24:39 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by 3-9 on Thu May 26 13:34:26 2016. Well, she said she was flat broke when she was down to her last half million. This shows she is out of synch with the common American.Meanwhile Donald has swindled hard working Americans out of $40 million and he's a hero. |
|
|
| (1369249) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Thu May 26 14:30:35 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by AlM on Thu May 26 14:24:39 2016. True, I didn't believe she was so broke she was eligible for welfare. But I did think their debts did reach the level of their assets. |
|
|
| (1369250) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu May 26 14:34:51 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by 3-9 on Thu May 26 14:30:35 2016. Probably. However, it was a dumb thing for a politician to say.But for some reason only she gets dinged for saying dumb things. Bernie, Donald, and the whole rest of the prior Republican crew can say all the dumb things they want, and everyone shrugs. |
|
|
| (1369256) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Thu May 26 14:56:33 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by AlM on Thu May 26 14:34:51 2016. I'm sure there's a sociological term for that kind of bias. Especially when it comes to Trump. :-) |
|
|
| (1369277) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu May 26 15:44:35 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Broadway Lion on Thu May 26 10:06:59 2016. Fasists are never a wise choice. The result of a trump election will be seen swiftly and financially. We will be cut off from the glbal economy, and once the dollar is no longer the standard currency.......there won't be an economy to speak of. |
|
|
| (1369303) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu May 26 16:38:41 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by TerrApin Station on Wed May 25 20:27:55 2016. Thanks for moving the thread. Although you should have done it right away instead of posting this response. |
|
|
| (1369338) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu May 26 17:22:43 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by AlM on Thu May 26 14:15:10 2016. Please....we need to help 51% of Americans to get sane by November. That's gonna be a lot of work...... |
|
|
| (1369340) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu May 26 17:23:40 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by 3-9 on Thu May 26 14:56:33 2016. Yep. It's called misogyny. |
|
|
| (1369385) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu May 26 19:24:30 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by bingbong on Thu May 26 15:44:35 2016. So then you and Selkirk will be broke. |
|
|
| (1369390) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu May 26 19:31:22 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu May 26 19:24:30 2016. So will YOU. |
|
|
| (1369391) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Thu May 26 19:35:18 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu May 26 16:38:41 2016. My bad. I'm not perfect, no matter how many of the less learned individuals here say I am. |
|
|
| (1369403) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Thu May 26 20:19:54 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by bingbong on Thu May 26 19:31:22 2016. Maybe unless my assets are in physical precious metals and real estate. Then maybe not so much. |
|
|
| (1369405) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu May 26 20:32:36 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by R2Chinatown on Thu May 26 20:19:54 2016. Metals are something they'll take. And I mean take. Same with real estate. In scenarios like this, tangible assets are what they seek. |
|
|
| (1369406) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Thu May 26 20:36:37 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by bingbong on Thu May 26 20:32:36 2016. Who will take? Are you talking about an armed invasion? Well then bet you'll be wishing that you had a gun - or chap stick. |
|
|
| (1369407) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Thu May 26 20:42:08 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by AlM on Thu May 26 14:34:51 2016.  |
|
|
| (1369413) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu May 26 21:27:58 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by R2Chinatown on Thu May 26 20:36:37 2016. Lulz. |
|
|
| (1375354) | |
Re: Hilary vindicated ?? |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Jun 26 13:14:30 2016, in response to Re: Hilary vindicated ??, posted by bingbong on Thu May 26 21:27:58 2016. Klutz |
|
|