|
|
| Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! (1362344) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
| (1362344) | |
Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by B68 SLOW POKE on Thu Apr 28 03:55:52 2016 TRUMP |
|
|
| (1362345) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 28 04:40:42 2016, in response to Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by B68 SLOW POKE on Thu Apr 28 03:55:52 2016. Meanwhile, in Cruz-missile land ... LOL!You've GOT to see the video, linked below. Heh. Carly's croon sparks bewilderment, criticism on social media Carly Fiorina was so happy to be named U.S. presidential hopeful Ted Cruz's running mate, she broke into song during her acceptance speech. But the chorus that greeted her on social media was anything but complimentary. Cruz announced at a rally on Wednesday in Indianapolis that the former Chief Executive Officer of Hewlett-Packard would join his ticket. But the unveiling faced scorn on social media after she started to sing while addressing the crowd. "I know two girls that I just adore," crooned Fiorina, in reference to Cruz's two daughters, Caroline and Catherine. "I'm so happy I can see them more. 'Cuz we travel on the bus all day; we get to play." (here) Twitter users reacted with bewilderment, mocking Fiorina over her singing. "Carly Fiorina started singing at a rally where she's named VP by a candidate who ain't getting the nod," tweeted writer and Ebony columnist Michael Arceneaux (@youngsinick). "This election is hilarious." "Fiorina is singing and it's extremely creepy," tweeted Donie O'Sullivan (@donie), the politics lead with news agency Storyful. "You know this was a joke but then she literally went and sang at the event," tweeted joseito (@go_oat). After suffering a series of crushing losses to Trump in nominating contests on Tuesday, Cruz praised Fiorina as a principled fighter for conservative values who knew how to create jobs and would be a valuable ally on the campaign trail. (Reporting by Amy Tennery; Additional reporting by James Oliphant; Editing by Richard Valdmanis and James Dalgleish) |
|
|
| (1362346) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Apr 28 05:06:34 2016, in response to Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by B68 SLOW POKE on Thu Apr 28 03:55:52 2016. I've been saying it the whole time. Come November, it will be Donald Trump winning against Killery. All the naysayers with their "ceiling" theories, blah blah blah will be eating crow the Wednesday after Election Day.You heard it here first! |
|
|
| (1362347) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 28 05:25:22 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Apr 28 05:06:34 2016.  |
|
|
| (1362348) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by B68 SLOW POKE on Thu Apr 28 05:36:34 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Apr 28 05:06:34 2016. Yes, The DON will kill the Killery. It will be a LANDS-SLIDE ! A New begin. |
|
|
| (1362356) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 07:21:20 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Apr 28 05:06:34 2016. Not a single head-to-head poll that says that.Trumps negatives are in the 60's, Hillary's negatives are in the 50's. She is the lesser of 2 evils. |
|
|
| (1362378) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 28 09:12:42 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Apr 28 05:06:34 2016. The NY Times' token conservative, Ross Douthat, has written a column just about you. |
|
|
| (1362381) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by R2Chinatown on Thu Apr 28 09:16:36 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Apr 28 05:06:34 2016. I'm not a Trump supporter but this year it's as simple as A-B-C !Anyone But Clinton |
|
|
| (1362418) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 28 10:12:29 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by AlM on Thu Apr 28 09:12:42 2016. How would you characterize Brooks then? |
|
|
| (1362427) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 28 10:21:36 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 28 10:12:29 2016. True, they have two tokens. Brooks is a bit less conservative than Douthat. |
|
|
| (1362435) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 10:31:58 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 28 04:40:42 2016. Problem with "...knew how to create jobs" is that she's best known for creating 30,000 layoffs. |
|
|
| (1362437) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 10:37:53 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Apr 28 05:06:34 2016. Get help. You seriously are in need of some serious medication.The only thing a trump candidacy will do is insure we'll be practicing saying Madam President on Nov 9. It comes down to a simple choice of competent or incompetent. Trump may do well with reale state deals, but it became quite clear that he hasn't clue about the rest of the world yesterday with his foreign policy speech yeaterday. Which, BTW he was barely able to read. Better he go back to the golf courses and casinos. |
|
|
| (1362439) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 10:44:46 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 07:21:20 2016. Last I heard, Trumps negatives are in the seventies to eighties, depnding on demographic. They aren't improving, Hillary's are slowly improving as people discover how wrong much of the reporting about her is. |
|
|
| (1362440) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 10:45:15 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 10:37:53 2016. Had he conservatively invested his inheritance, he'd be far richer today. Trump is not stupid, but is a terrible businessman and deal-maker. |
|
|
| (1362446) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 28 10:54:51 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 10:37:53 2016. You want to send a lot of people to get help, don't you? |
|
|
| (1362470) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 12:28:14 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 28 10:54:51 2016. Only those that need it. Obamacare covers that now. It's all good. |
|
|
| (1362473) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 12:39:02 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 10:45:15 2016. True. But yesterday's speech has to make one wonder just how bright he is.He read a prepared text, and had a hard time getting through it, misprouncing words throughout. He did not appear to have a grasp on foriegn ploicy. He would have done himself better to cull a few experts from all those thinktanks (this speech was delivered in DC, where this could be accomplished practically by going door to door and asking anyone hanging around if they'd like a government job) and used the time and overage to introduce a foreign policy team. That would make him appear smart enough to put together advisors to handle something he clearly has zero concept of, zero experience in, and from appearances, little desire to learn. |
|
|
| (1362482) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 28 13:01:23 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 12:28:14 2016. With very high deductibles. |
|
|
| (1362484) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 13:11:04 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 10:31:58 2016. Create, yes, in India, and I thought it was 40,000. |
|
|
| (1362485) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 13:12:13 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 28 13:01:23 2016. The alternative is nothing.Also "bingbong" would not be alive. Do you wish her or anybody harm ? What is your alternative ? |
|
|
| (1362519) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 28 14:43:38 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 10:44:46 2016. Last you heard, Kermit Gosnell had done nothing wrong or was it that George Zimmerman would be found guilty. |
|
|
| (1362543) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 28 15:40:39 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 13:12:13 2016. Of course not. I'm glad she's alive. But the ACA is misnamed. It really is the unfordable healthcare act. |
|
|
| (1362545) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 15:43:47 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 28 15:40:39 2016. Do you have a better one in mind ? |
|
|
| (1362546) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 28 15:44:47 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 15:43:47 2016. Better name? |
|
|
| (1362551) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 15:54:14 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 28 14:43:38 2016. The numbers are from your guys. Lulz. |
|
|
| (1362553) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 16:00:37 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 28 15:44:47 2016. No, a better health care plan ? |
|
|
| (1362561) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 28 17:16:17 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 15:54:14 2016. Klutz! |
|
|
| (1362563) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 28 17:20:51 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 28 15:40:39 2016. ACA was the "Corporate Insurance Benefit Act of 2010" and despite it being designed to line the industry's pockets with money, they still weren't happy. Pity we didn't just give the nation Medicare. That would have worked. |
|
|
| (1362569) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 17:50:06 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 28 17:20:51 2016. That would have been the "public option". There weren't even enough Democrats to pass that. |
|
|
| (1362575) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 28 18:02:45 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 17:50:06 2016. Correct. So we ended up with the Heritage Foundation/Romneycare plan instead. |
|
|
| (1362576) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 18:04:15 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 28 18:02:45 2016. Which began life as Dolecare. All Republicans disowned it. |
|
|
| (1362577) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 28 18:06:09 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by Joe V on Thu Apr 28 18:04:15 2016. Of course ... it didn't give the Aetna's and UnitedHellcare's enough vigorish. |
|
|
| (1362584) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Thu Apr 28 18:45:02 2016, in response to Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by B68 SLOW POKE on Thu Apr 28 03:55:52 2016. oh oh |
|
|
| (1362585) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 28 18:53:55 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 15:54:14 2016. Are you claiming that your predictions were correct? You are an idiot. |
|
|
| (1362588) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 19:14:10 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 28 18:53:55 2016. I'm merely the messenger here. |
|
|
| (1362599) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Thu Apr 28 20:06:29 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 28 05:25:22 2016. You just got me interested in seeing Idiocracy. And, unfortunately, the guy makes very good points. :-( |
|
|
| (1362603) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 28 20:29:11 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by 3-9 on Thu Apr 28 20:06:29 2016. It's this generation's answer to Paddy Chayevsky's "Network" ... also explains Trump. ;) |
|
|
| (1362607) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 28 21:28:37 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 19:14:10 2016. So if you are the messenger who gave you the message? Who told you that Kermit Gosnell did nothing wrong? Who told you that George Zimmerman would be found guilty? |
|
|
| (1362609) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 28 21:33:32 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 19:14:10 2016. So if you are the messenger who gave you the message? Who told you that Kermit Gosnell did nothing wrong? Who told you that George Zimmerman would be found guilty? |
|
|
| (1362616) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 22:23:17 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 28 21:28:37 2016. Glenn Beck. One of yours. |
|
|
| (1362618) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 28 22:53:43 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 22:23:17 2016. Oh really. Please post your proff or admit thst you are not only an idiot bu also a liar. |
|
|
| (1362621) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 23:30:26 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 28 22:53:43 2016. Google "glenn beck trump negatives". It's there. And fuck yourself while youre at it.Never see any proof of thing one out of you. |
|
|
| (1362624) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Apr 29 00:45:36 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 23:30:26 2016. You must think that you are talking to one of you former consorts. HPV can cause throat cancer. |
|
|
| (1362626) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Fri Apr 29 00:55:57 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Apr 29 00:45:36 2016. Lulz. You? Never. I have no use for someone with the personality of Ted Cruz. |
|
|
| (1362628) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Fri Apr 29 02:00:45 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Fri Apr 29 00:55:57 2016. Klutz! |
|
|
| (1362631) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by Express Rider on Fri Apr 29 02:51:20 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 10:44:46 2016. "Hillary's are slowly improving as people discover how wrong much of the reporting about her is."- there has been a smear campaign against HILARY since Clinton was running for his 1st presidential term. |
|
|
| (1362632) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Apr 29 02:52:13 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by Express Rider on Fri Apr 29 02:51:20 2016. And it will continue. Only dimwitted republicans seem to think that shaman stick still works. :) |
|
|
| (1362634) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Apr 29 02:54:03 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Apr 29 00:45:36 2016. Yes it can. Especially when it's contracted from improperly sterilized dental equipment. Takes a few decades for it to catch up, but the former dentist in question had one of those very noticeable "cancer clusters."You're a detestable piece of shit. |
|
|
| (1362641) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Apr 29 06:13:07 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 28 10:37:53 2016. How do you come to the conclusion that I need help and serious medication based on my short statement. Typical Lib, claims to be "open" and inclusive and tolerant-----Unless you say something that you don't agree with. THEN, the insults come out.I've been watching the know-it-all nebbish dyed in the wool "NYC Liberals" and even some more of the Conservative types constantly stating how Trimp's going to be out of the race in January, then it was February, then March, OOPS! Now it's he COULD win the Republican Nominee ( He WILL win!). Now it's Trump can NEVER win against Killery. BUUUUT, a strange thing keeps happening! PEOPLE keep on giving Donald numbers! RECORD numbers at that! Now I'm sure the nebbishes will all respond with numbers, percentages, etc... telling me that I'm wrong, I have no proof, blah blah blah.. I say to all of the naysayers...Wait until November! BTW, as a registered Democrat since 17 years old when they registered the whole senior class, I voted last week in the primaries. AND, I voted for Bernie. NOT because I agree with him or any of his zany proposals, but because of my hatred and distrust of Hitlery. Like they say, ABC! |
|
|
| (1362644) | |
Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP ! |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Fri Apr 29 06:29:48 2016, in response to Re: Let's get it on ! TRUMP !, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 28 15:40:39 2016. Don't get me started on the ACA! Do you know that *I* have to pay taxes for it, EVEN THOUGH I have a career that has full benefits! So, it stands to reason that since I already have medical coverage, I shouldn't have to pay into it. The people who need/want Obamacare should be the ones who should pay the taxes for it. Oops! Silly me, THEY can't afford to pay the taxes needed, so why not sock the people who already pay taxes for everything else and/or have medical coverage!! Also, thanks to Obamacare, many prescription meds that I used to get dirt cheap, are now significantly higher, and both the pharmacists, and my union officials both say Obamacare is the cause for it! That's my rant for tonight, so now everyone can call me ignorant, a simpleton,I'm wrong, yadda yadda yadda. I really don't give a fuck at this point. |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|