|
|
| Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info (1329928) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (1330175) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Dec 1 16:04:41 2015, in response to Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by Dave on Mon Nov 30 22:03:57 2015. The GOP single-handedly got Hillary elected POTUS when they had her testify before the BENGHAZI! Committee.I hope they have her again so she can run up the score. |
|
|
| (1330177) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Tue Dec 1 16:08:39 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by SMAZ on Tue Dec 1 16:04:41 2015. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1330178) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Dec 1 16:11:14 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Dec 1 09:30:24 2015. I'll bet you could make such a convincing argument for driving while intoxicated.AlM is George W. Bush? |
|
|
| (1330180) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Tue Dec 1 16:14:46 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by SMAZ on Tue Dec 1 16:11:14 2015. Ha- I had the same thought! |
|
|
| (1330184) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Dec 1 16:39:26 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by SMAZ on Tue Dec 1 16:11:14 2015. No, but I could make an argument as to why Bush's past history didn't totally disqualify him for the Presidency.Or Jeb, or Rubio, or even Christie, though Christie would be more of a challenge. I can't do it for Trump though. :) |
|
|
| (1330192) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Dec 1 17:04:06 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by Dave on Tue Dec 1 13:26:59 2015. No, HE'S an idiot. :) |
|
|
| (1330195) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Dec 1 17:19:13 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by TonyG on Tue Dec 1 09:04:51 2015. Funniest thing though about the "conservative cause." Their erosion of those liberties provides the government with the means to go after THEM. :)I trust that Breitbart is an acceptable source to them as to just ONE example. :) http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/30/watchdog-milwaukee-democrat-da-spied-on-conservative-groups-tried-to-take-down-walker/ |
|
|
| (1330244) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Tue Dec 1 20:15:09 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Dec 1 17:04:06 2015. Hah! |
|
|
| (1330249) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Tue Dec 1 20:19:56 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Dec 1 13:43:49 2015. On behalf of Dave from the Metroplex, who is presently indisposed and who I am acting for in absentia, as governing agent in an official capacity, I accept your apology and no offense taken. |
|
|
| (1330356) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Wed Dec 2 03:44:45 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by bingbong on Tue Dec 1 11:51:49 2015. Ha ha! |
|
|
| (1330362) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 2 04:21:54 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by bingbong on Tue Dec 1 11:51:49 2015. Positively affecting my brain.You should do Whole 30. It's not so bad. |
|
|
| (1330380) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 2 09:19:47 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Dec 2 04:21:54 2015. Nope. Negatively. You stopped thinking clearly a good number of weeks ago. |
|
|
| (1330383) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by WayneJay on Wed Dec 2 09:39:50 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Dec 1 10:02:26 2015. No, I don't. |
|
|
| (1330388) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 10:01:59 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by WayneJay on Wed Dec 2 09:39:50 2015. So when Clinton says that she had no classified emails on her personal server and with 67% of the server content released, 999 of the messages were found to contain classified data, how can you say people are making a big deal over nothing? It seems that you are so invested in the outcome of this election that you are willing to overlook her criminal behavior. |
|
|
| (1330390) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 2 10:04:18 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 10:01:59 2015. The data was NOT classified at the time. I was classified last week. That was more from a protection against public release thing, not wanting sensitive info in the public. But none of it was classified when it went through that server.THAT IS THE POINT the RW media is IGNORING. |
|
|
| (1330395) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 10:20:48 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 2 10:04:18 2015. Can you really be that ignorant. The data was sensative from inception. It was unsecured on her personal server. Would you want your personal medical records sent from the hospital server to your drs personal email server. Face it. The only reason this is no big deal is because Clinton is a docrat and you are a political shill. |
|
|
| (1330398) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Wed Dec 2 10:28:00 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 10:20:48 2015. First you say it was classified - now it's "sensitive." Backtracking much? |
|
|
| (1330403) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 10:39:09 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by italianstallion on Wed Dec 2 10:28:00 2015. What I call it is hardly the point. It's what the Inspector General and the FBI call it that counts and that count now stands at 999 emails. The former Secretary of State said that those emails didn't exist on her server, which has been proven to be a lie. If she didn't revognize that the information on her server was classified, then her lack of judgement proves she's not qualified to be president. |
|
|
| (1330405) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 2 10:43:46 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 10:20:48 2015. Can you be so ignorant? Her server was far more secure than you can comprehend, since it's technical stuff the average civil servant wouldn't understand. Add to that the fact that the email was accessed on a Blackberry, which is encrypted to the device. That's why government USES Blackberry to begin with.Medical records exist within a different chain. They wouldn't go to a doctor's "personal server" since they probably use the same email server most Time Warner customers do. Mail name@Xxx.rr.com. The server at his practice is just as secure as the hospital. Solitary practices are simply rarer than hens teeth, even in the countryside. Get real. The reason this is no big deal is because it's simply no big deal. There is no evidence that data that was classified at the time was ever on her server. New laws have outlawed the practice, and that's fine too. |
|
|
| (1330407) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 2 10:47:10 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 10:39:09 2015. None of it was at the time it was on the server. That's why this issue is closed. It was classified before "release" to ensure sensitive information didn't end up broadcast over Foxnews. That's sensible, as we all know Foxnews is not.Even their own article states that. Why not try reading it? Surely they write at your reading level. |
|
|
| (1330410) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 10:51:16 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 2 10:43:46 2015. Ignorant? Projecting much again?Protip: Some people who are a lot more intelligent than you and a lot more knowledgeable than you disagree with you. I have not seen your name appear on any witness list in the investigation. Why do you think that is? Face it. You are just a political shill who can't see the truth because of your willful blindness. |
|
|
| (1330412) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Dec 2 10:53:09 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 10:39:09 2015. The FBI only investigates criminal activity. Criminal activity only involves information marked as classified, not information that is sensitive (and probably should have been marked as classified) but wasn't marked as classified. |
|
|
| (1330415) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 2 10:59:07 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 10:51:16 2015. I think that's because nobody asked, not because I don't know the deal on securing a mailserver. They know I know this stuff. How many tech companies have you run?You're the politicl shill here that can't see beyond the shit you're fed by the RW media. You don't even know the tech. You can't even discern between today, alst week and last year, or you'd comprehend the timeline aspect to this issue. |
|
|
| (1330416) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 2 11:02:08 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by AlM on Wed Dec 2 10:53:09 2015. Not to mention that sensitive material marked classified last week doesn't matter, what mattered is that it wasn't classified during the time it existed on that server, as documented in the timestamps. Simple concept, they don't get it.The stuff was classified so Fauxnews couldn't broadcast it all over the planet. |
|
|
| (1330420) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 11:06:24 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by AlM on Wed Dec 2 10:53:09 2015. So what is the FBI spending so much time investigating? Maybe it's not asvyou see it. |
|
|
| (1330422) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Dec 2 11:36:49 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 11:06:24 2015. So what is the FBI spending so much time investigating?Whether any criminal activity has taken place. |
|
|
| (1330424) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 2 11:40:41 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by AlM on Wed Dec 2 11:36:49 2015. Apparently the answer is no. The RW can't handle that. |
|
|
| (1330426) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by WayneJay on Wed Dec 2 12:13:25 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 2 11:40:41 2015. Like with the seemingly endless Benghazi "investigations". |
|
|
| (1330435) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 13:02:22 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by AlM on Wed Dec 2 11:36:49 2015. And the crime would be? Keeping classified documents on a non government secure server |
|
|
| (1330454) | |
Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Wed Dec 2 14:17:39 2015, in response to Re: Nearly 1,000 Clinton emails had classified info, posted by bingbong on Wed Dec 2 10:59:07 2015. Name the successful tech companies you've run |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||