|
|
| Re: 150 Years Ago Today (1281053) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (1281398) | |
Re: 150 Years Ago Today |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 16 15:29:16 2015, in response to Re: 150 Years Ago Today, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 16 14:27:20 2015. I'm not a legal scholar but didn't the federal version precede Hobby Lobby by more than 10 years. |
|
|
| (1281406) | |
Re: 150 Years Ago Today |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 16 15:55:57 2015, in response to Re: 150 Years Ago Today, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 16 15:29:16 2015. So? How does that conflict with my claim that the ruling expanded it? |
|
|
| (1281419) | |
Re: 150 Years Ago Today |
|
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 16 18:26:18 2015, in response to Re: 150 Years Ago Today, posted by AlM on Thu Apr 16 09:31:27 2015. What does a law in Indiana or several other states, in effect now, have to do with South Africa in the past?BTW: You certainly seem like one. |
|
|
| (1281421) | |
Re: 150 Years Ago Today |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 16 19:00:20 2015, in response to Re: 150 Years Ago Today, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 16 18:26:18 2015. Wow. You really like that post. |
|
|
| (1281481) | |
Re: 150 Years Ago Today |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri Apr 17 02:43:34 2015, in response to Re: 150 Years Ago Today, posted by R2ChinaTown on Thu Apr 16 15:29:16 2015. The federal version only pertained to discrimination by the the federal government itself (smoking peyote on federal lands, having hair of a certain length while in federal prison, wearing a veil, etc etc).It has nothing to do with private citizens or businesses having the ability to discriminate. |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||