|
|
| FCC says Redskins name not Offensive (1248395) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (1248395) | |
FCC says Redskins name not Offensive |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Dec 19 09:34:15 2014 Here. |
|
|
| (1248401) | |
Re: FCC says Redskins name not obscene |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 19 11:04:37 2014, in response to FCC says Redskins name not Offensive, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Dec 19 09:34:15 2014. It means it's not the equivalent of words you can't say on TV like shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker and tits. Some ringing endorsement.Special thanks to George Carlin for making this post possible. |
|
|
| (1248405) | |
Re: FCC says Redskins name not Offensive |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Fri Dec 19 12:12:23 2014, in response to FCC says Redskins name not Offensive, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Dec 19 09:34:15 2014. zzzzzzzzzzz |
|
|
| (1248406) | |
Re: FCC says Redskins name not Offensive |
|
|
Posted by SLRT on Fri Dec 19 12:13:01 2014, in response to Re: FCC says Redskins name not Offensive, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Fri Dec 19 12:12:23 2014. For once I agree. |
|
|
| (1248408) | |
Re: FCC says Redskins name not obscene |
|
|
Posted by SLRT on Fri Dec 19 12:14:36 2014, in response to Re: FCC says Redskins name not obscene, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Dec 19 11:04:37 2014. Broadcast TV. |
|
|
| (1248410) | |
Re: FCC says Redskins name not Offensive |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Fri Dec 19 12:26:20 2014, in response to Re: FCC says Redskins name not Offensive, posted by SLRT on Fri Dec 19 12:13:01 2014. thank you |
|
|
| (1248412) | |
Re: FCC says Redskins name not Offensive |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Dec 19 12:29:24 2014, in response to Re: FCC says Redskins name not Offensive, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Fri Dec 19 12:12:23 2014. When will Los Angeles ever get an NFL team? |
|
|
| (1248478) | |
Re: FCC says Redskins name not Excretory or Sexual |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Dec 19 15:29:11 2014, in response to FCC says Redskins name not Offensive, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Dec 19 09:34:15 2014. "But the FCC said that the law defines profanity as sexual or excretory in nature — meanings that don't relate to the name of the football team."Big difference. |
|
|
| (1248501) | |
Re: FCC says Redskins name not Offensive |
|
|
Posted by busdude2 on Fri Dec 19 16:53:43 2014, in response to FCC says Redskins name not Offensive, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Dec 19 09:34:15 2014. Good, enough with this political correct crap. People need to get a life. Don't like the name don't watch them. Simple |
|
|
| (1248505) | |
Re: FCC says Redskins name not Offensive |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Fri Dec 19 17:04:21 2014, in response to Re: FCC says Redskins name not Offensive, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Dec 19 12:29:24 2014. we dont know but we are not going to pay for a new stadium ether |
|
|