|
|
| Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting (1238001) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
| (1238001) | |
Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sat Nov 1 07:53:42 2014 Justice Department investigators have all but concluded they do not have a strong enough case |
|
|
| (1238053) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 12:28:14 2014, in response to Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Dave on Sat Nov 1 07:53:42 2014. so a white police officer can murder a black man and get away with it |
|
|
| (1238055) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Sat Nov 1 12:31:29 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 12:28:14 2014. Hardly. A diligent investigation was conducted into the events surrounding the shooting. I am happy that the law rather than emotion appears to be prevailing |
|
|
| (1238061) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 12:49:31 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by mtk52983 on Sat Nov 1 12:31:29 2014. there is no law herejust a right to MURDDER black people this makes you happy |
|
|
| (1238062) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Sat Nov 1 13:20:58 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 12:49:31 2014. I'm happy that the investigation is not letting emotion dictate decisions. You should be too. If a black officer shot a white person in a predominantly white area you would not want the mob dictating the result |
|
|
| (1238064) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 13:56:54 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by mtk52983 on Sat Nov 1 13:20:58 2014. no you are happy that black man was MURDERED by a white cop |
|
|
| (1238068) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Nov 1 14:15:03 2014, in response to Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Dave on Sat Nov 1 07:53:42 2014. What, Holder throwing in the towel? Sounds like he's a one-man nation of cowards. |
|
|
| (1238069) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Sat Nov 1 14:20:59 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 13:56:54 2014. I do not celebrate such a tragic death. What I am happy about is that rule of law appears to be prevailing |
|
|
| (1238070) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 14:22:39 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by mtk52983 on Sat Nov 1 14:20:59 2014. yeah the MURDER of a young black man with a good future |
|
|
| (1238082) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sat Nov 1 15:50:59 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 14:22:39 2014. A Justice Department that is under strong pressure from the AG to find Wilson guilty of something is coming up with nothing. That should tell you the merits or lack thereof of the charges. |
|
|
| (1238084) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 15:58:56 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 13:56:54 2014. a black man appears to have been killed by a police officer in a wholly justified shooting. The race of the officer is not relevant. |
|
|
| (1238100) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 16:25:57 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 15:58:56 2014. no it was not justified at all he was MURDERED in cold blood ! |
|
|
| (1238101) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 16:26:22 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Dave on Sat Nov 1 15:50:59 2014. yeah sure |
|
|
| (1238106) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sat Nov 1 16:38:21 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 16:25:57 2014. We'll know soon but based on information leaked out, both a grand jury and a Justice Department investigation disagree with you. I wonder which of the three of you has the most informed opinion?1. The grand jury who heard from witnesses and saw all the evidence? 2. The Justice Department, which completed its own investigation and evaluated the testimony of dozens of witnesses? 3. Salaam, who has neither seen any evidence nor heard testimony from any witnesses? Hmmm, that's a tough call.... |
|
|
| (1238133) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 18:31:15 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 16:25:57 2014. Based on what information was he murdered? |
|
|
| (1238144) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 19:16:20 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Dave on Sat Nov 1 16:38:21 2014. he had his hands up when he was MURDERED many people saw this eve witness |
|
|
| (1238145) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 19:16:40 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 18:31:15 2014. fact |
|
|
| (1238149) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 20:02:29 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 19:16:40 2014. Okay, you have my almost undivided attention. Tell me what facts you have that I an not aware of. |
|
|
| (1238150) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 20:03:20 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 19:16:20 2014. Name 2 of those people |
|
|
| (1238163) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 21:09:19 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 20:02:29 2014. the witnessnes who have not been called yet said he was MURDEREDhands up unarmed |
|
|
| (1238164) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 21:10:24 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 20:03:20 2014. they have not been called to tell their side of the true story yet |
|
|
| (1238166) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Sat Nov 1 21:12:12 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 21:09:19 2014. Considering what the former AG has said you would think the witnesses not spoken to were the ones supporting Officer Wilson. When the autopsy report came out if they had someone to the contrary that would have been front and center |
|
|
| (1238167) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Sat Nov 1 21:13:13 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 21:10:24 2014. You know that personally? Didn't know you knew people in Ferguson |
|
|
| (1238168) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 21:17:43 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 21:10:24 2014. How do you know? Are you privy to secret grand jury testimony? |
|
|
| (1238169) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 1 21:33:31 2014, in response to Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Dave on Sat Nov 1 07:53:42 2014. “The evidence at this point does not support civil rights charges against Officer Wilson,” said one person briefed on the investigation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case.Hearsay. |
|
|
| (1238170) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 21:51:20 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 1 21:33:31 2014.  |
|
|
| (1238171) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sat Nov 1 21:59:50 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 1 21:33:31 2014. Let's assume the sentence read:“The evidence at this point does support civil rights charges against Officer Wilson,” said one person briefed on the investigation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case. Would you still be posting "hearsay"? |
|
|
| (1238172) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 1 22:25:03 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Dave on Sat Nov 1 21:59:50 2014. Yes. Until the actual reports are released, it's all hearsay. |
|
|
| (1238175) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 22:53:10 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 1 21:33:31 2014. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1238176) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 22:53:40 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 1 22:25:03 2014. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1238177) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 22:54:50 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by mtk52983 on Sat Nov 1 21:13:13 2014. yep heard it on al sharptons radio show |
|
|
| (1238178) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 22:55:33 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by mtk52983 on Sat Nov 1 21:12:12 2014. bullshit |
|
|
| (1238179) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 22:55:50 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 22:54:50 2014. Now there's proof if I ever heard it. |
|
|
| (1238183) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 23:00:35 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 22:55:50 2014. yep the eye witness were on his show |
|
|
| (1238184) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 23:01:24 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 21:17:43 2014. yeah ! |
|
|
| (1238187) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 23:05:13 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 23:00:35 2014. Name them, please? Were the given sworn testimony? |
|
|
| (1238188) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 23:05:38 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 23:01:24 2014. Name your sources. |
|
|
| (1238191) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 23:12:07 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 23:05:13 2014. id did not write them down ok ?also heardof them on the jessie jackson show |
|
|
| (1238192) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 23:12:49 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 23:05:38 2014. al sharpton showkeep hope alive with jessie jackson radio show |
|
|
| (1238194) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 23:17:14 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 23:05:38 2014. also the carl nelson radio show on wol radio |
|
|
| (1238196) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 23:26:26 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 23:12:07 2014. Then without proof, I'm afraid that your statements are worthless. |
|
|
| (1238197) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 23:27:20 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 23:05:38 2014. So Al Sharpton has been broadcasting secret grand jury proceedings? |
|
|
| (1238198) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 23:28:59 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 23:26:26 2014. only in your mind |
|
|
| (1238199) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sat Nov 1 23:29:15 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Train Dude on Sat Nov 1 23:27:20 2014. no |
|
|
| (1238230) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Nov 2 07:15:19 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 1 22:25:03 2014. That's true but why would this news be released if it weren't accurate? Who gains by it? |
|
|
| (1238234) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Nov 2 08:07:09 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Dave on Sun Nov 2 07:15:19 2014. The RW has a long history of putting their propaganda out there.People still believe abortions cause breast cancer. Nothing is further than the truth. That there is FACTUALLY NO CORRELATION has been studied and restudied for over thirty years. Explain that and then maybe we'll talk some more. |
|
|
| (1238235) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Nov 2 08:07:56 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Dave on Sun Nov 2 07:15:19 2014. The Ferguson Police force gains. Just like they gained in PR with the news that Officer Wilson had a broken eye socket.That doesn't make these leaks false either, of course. |
|
|
| (1238247) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Nov 2 10:57:26 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by bingbong on Sun Nov 2 08:07:09 2014. A non-responsive answer and totally irrelevant.What gain is there in leaking this news if it isn't true? |
|
|
| (1238248) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Nov 2 10:59:48 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by Dave on Sun Nov 2 10:57:26 2014. What gain was there from leaking the news that Officer Wilson had a broken eye socket? |
|
|
| (1238249) | |
Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Nov 2 11:05:09 2014, in response to Re: Federal civil rights charges unlikely against police officer in Ferguson shooting, posted by AlM on Sun Nov 2 08:07:56 2014. Gain what? |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|