Betrayal in Benghazi (1236089) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
(1236090) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Oct 24 13:16:42 2014, in response to Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by Dave on Fri Oct 24 13:13:04 2014. Still flogging this dead horse?BTW, "It has been over eight months since the attack on our compound in Benghazi. " Huh? When was this outdated piece written , anyway? |
|
(1236092) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by Dave on Fri Oct 24 13:19:52 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by italianstallion on Fri Oct 24 13:16:42 2014. Last year. |
|
(1236093) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Oct 24 13:20:13 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by Dave on Fri Oct 24 13:19:52 2014. Clearly. |
|
(1236116) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Oct 24 14:40:40 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by italianstallion on Fri Oct 24 13:16:42 2014. Tell that to the families of these victims. |
|
(1236117) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 14:46:41 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Oct 24 14:40:40 2014. Should also tell them why there STILL isn't sufficient funding for embassy security even after that. |
|
(1236118) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Oct 24 14:47:45 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Oct 24 14:40:40 2014. Yes, and shame on those who politicize their tragic deaths. |
|
(1236121) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Oct 24 15:08:23 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by italianstallion on Fri Oct 24 14:47:45 2014. WHAT ABOUT THE ONE OCCUPYING THE WHITE HOUSE RIGHT NOW? |
|
(1236122) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Oct 24 15:09:31 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 14:46:41 2014. I suppose it was all a you tube videos fault? |
|
(1236133) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 16:43:00 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Oct 24 15:09:31 2014. Certainly did have a part in it. Did you also know that due to budget shortfalls, security there was farmed out to a British security contractor (similar to Blackwater but much cheaper) who turned around and hired locals?But yeah, lets blame Hillary for not passing the budget for that which was requested. |
|
(1236135) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Fri Oct 24 17:20:08 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 16:43:00 2014. You probably know who I am voting for. |
|
(1236158) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 20:58:08 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by chicagomotorman on Fri Oct 24 17:20:08 2014. Thanks! :) |
|
(1236169) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Oct 24 22:06:00 2014, in response to Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by Dave on Fri Oct 24 13:13:04 2014. Face it, we only lost 4 people, a fraction of what has been lost under other administrations, and under other endeavors. 4 people have become a tragedy while 4000 have been all but swept under the rug. We only had one consulate attacked in the post 9/11 world where the other administration saw, what, 11? Bringing up Benghazi over and over and over is really dumb. your pal, Fred |
|
(1236178) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Oct 24 22:33:53 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 20:58:08 2014. ????????????????????????????????????? |
|
(1236181) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by 3-9 on Fri Oct 24 22:36:04 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by Fred G on Fri Oct 24 22:06:00 2014. That's what happens when embassy attacks are rarer - you become sensitized to them. |
|
(1236184) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 22:40:56 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Fri Oct 24 22:33:53 2014. Diebolds ... making sure that republicans vote correctly. Wasn't so much of a problem when they first came out, but most programmers are hipsters. :) |
|
(1236186) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 22:42:48 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by 3-9 on Fri Oct 24 22:36:04 2014. And it was a temporary consulate/safe house attack. Embassies get real Marines. |
|
(1236187) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Fri Oct 24 22:44:44 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 22:40:56 2014. I'm voting for Bruce Rauner for governor, and Jim Oberweiss for senator. And of course you probably don't like either one of them. |
|
(1236191) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by 3-9 on Fri Oct 24 23:24:23 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 22:42:48 2014. That's true too, it wasn't even the embassy. Keep forgetting that since it isn't emphasized when the topic comes around. :-/ |
|
(1236197) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 23:39:53 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by 3-9 on Fri Oct 24 23:24:23 2014. Of course not ... propaganda depends on half truths and the exclusion of bulk truth. It's called "positioning" ... VERY tragic situation. The ambassador had been told NOT to go there, but he wanted to be visible and the "hired guns" who protected both the temporary consulate and the diplomatic "safe house" were absolutely not up to the task.I wonder if they got any additional funding since that to bring in professionals? Haven't heard BOO about that. |
|
(1236205) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Oct 25 00:19:56 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by chicagomotorman on Fri Oct 24 22:44:44 2014. You really must not like your pension. |
|
(1236256) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by train dude on Sat Oct 25 08:24:41 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Oct 24 23:39:53 2014. Sure you have. Hillary refused the request. Geez- she lies. You lie. You should at least be able to figure this one out. |
|
(1236261) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sat Oct 25 08:55:17 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by bingbong on Sat Oct 25 00:19:56 2014. I love the United States of America. |
|
(1236265) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by train dude on Sat Oct 25 09:04:10 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sat Oct 25 08:55:17 2014. You miss the point. There are always consequences for not thinking like bingbong. Pensions are high on her threat list. |
|
(1236290) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Oct 25 12:17:31 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by train dude on Sat Oct 25 09:04:10 2014. I would think they'd be high on his, and ours as well. |
|
(1236297) | |
Re: Betrayal in Benghazi |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Oct 25 12:23:32 2014, in response to Re: Betrayal in Benghazi, posted by train dude on Sat Oct 25 08:24:41 2014. Sorry, but no amount of twisted thinking will arrive at the stuff you've been fed. |
|