|
|
| Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation (1175966) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (1175966) | |
Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by DAnD124 on Sat Apr 19 13:26:38 2014 http://www.vox.com/2014/4/18/5620702/case-for-confiscatory-taxation |
|
|
| (1175973) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Apr 19 14:26:39 2014, in response to Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by DAnD124 on Sat Apr 19 13:26:38 2014. Interesting.But all this about the CEO's and confiscatory taxation is all talk. It's real estate that will be confiscated first. And then distributed based on needs. |
|
|
| (1175979) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Apr 19 14:55:05 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Apr 19 14:26:39 2014. You know nothing, LuchAAA. |
|
|
| (1175980) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Apr 19 14:59:10 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Apr 19 14:55:05 2014. I know you got owned by Nilet and have been on the rag ever since. Now you redirect your anger towards me to ease the pain.But you'll go away. |
|
|
| (1175987) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Apr 19 15:13:43 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Apr 19 14:59:10 2014. How did I get "owned" by Nilet? Do you even pay attention? Have you read the posts? Do you not see how that asshole is logically bereft? Of course you don't. You seem to think he's some sort of muscle man when nothing could be further from the truth. You just love to make your ASSumptions, even though random guessing would have a higher accuracy rate.I respond to you every time you make your spurious and uninformed claim of redistribution. |
|
|
| (1175989) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Apr 19 15:16:02 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Apr 19 15:13:43 2014. My vision is a lot more realistic than tax redistribution.Have a Happy Easter. |
|
|
| (1176000) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Apr 19 15:23:28 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Apr 19 15:16:02 2014. No, it isn't. It is entirely unrealistic. It is a vision of a man whose mind was ruined by a diet of talk radio demagoguery. |
|
|
| (1176007) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Apr 19 15:38:39 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Apr 19 15:23:28 2014. I w1ll respond after Easter vigil. |
|
|
| (1176057) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Sat Apr 19 16:46:45 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Apr 19 14:26:39 2014. It's ironic you should mention that, because a rancher in Nevada, with the help of "libertarian" supporters, just about did that TO the government. |
|
|
| (1176090) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Apr 19 17:30:54 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by 3-9 on Sat Apr 19 16:46:45 2014. Don't forget he is a deadbeat rancher, who owes the American people about a million dollars in rents for grazinfg land. |
|
|
| (1176121) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Sat Apr 19 17:50:32 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by bingbong on Sat Apr 19 17:30:54 2014. Hey, but it's the big bad government, who took a bunch of his taxes anyway, so he doesn't have to pay it! |
|
|
| (1176134) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Apr 19 18:00:13 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by 3-9 on Sat Apr 19 17:50:32 2014. What I don't get is that the jackass could write off those rents from his taxes if he had actually paid them. Imagine how much less in taxes he'd have to pay then...... |
|
|
| (1176158) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Sat Apr 19 18:13:52 2014, in response to Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by DAnD124 on Sat Apr 19 13:26:38 2014. Well that was a bit of a damp squib.I read the title "confiscatory taxation" and got warmed up for a long rant about left-wing nutters trying to prevent people from earning a living (a decidedly rare opportunity on a forum that leans as far to the right as OTChat) but then I read the article and it only called for a confiscatory tax on inheritances (that nobody's entitled to anyway) and a high marginal tax rate for very high incomes like we hand in the 1950s. |
|
|
| (1176189) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Apr 19 18:28:58 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by bingbong on Sat Apr 19 18:00:13 2014. I'll bet his tax lawyer was Paul Ryan. :) |
|
|
| (1176224) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Apr 19 18:53:54 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by Nilet on Sat Apr 19 18:13:52 2014. And the right wants to bring us back fully into the 1950's ... except that. :-\ |
|
|
| (1176263) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Sat Apr 19 20:32:58 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Apr 19 18:53:54 2014. Isn't selective memory grand? :-) |
|
|
| (1176283) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Apr 20 00:30:44 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by 3-9 on Sat Apr 19 20:32:58 2014. Alzheimer's ... the taste of a whole new generation. :) |
|
|
| (1176292) | |
Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sun Apr 20 01:41:20 2014, in response to Re: Beyond the Laffer Curve — the case for confiscatory taxation, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Apr 19 15:23:28 2014. Talk radio, AMerican format is intelligent talk. Prager. Hewitt. Medved. Even Limbaugh. They have not influenced my way of thinking.But my attitude about confiscatory taxation is in line with a sizable percentage of this country. Especially as it pertains to real estate. Why have an elderly white couple in a $600,000 2 BR in Middle Village while a family of 5 Latinos live in a roach-infested 1 BR on top of a take out joint on Jamaica Avenue and give all their money to family back home and a Pentecostal storefront church down the block. Confiscatory real estate taxation will be easiest to implement. Thanks for attacking. |
|
|