|
|
| Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought (1168835) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 13 |
||
|
| (1168959) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 3 02:39:22 2014, in response to North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 2 17:36:24 2014. Voter fraud is extremely common. Why, in just five minutes, poll watchers observed four black people voting in one district alone! Poll watchers in Raleigh have observed extensive voting by students, and all across the state, women have been attempting to cast ballots.A spokesman for North Carolina Board of Elections reminded an audience of Real Americans™ that all three of these groups are, statistically, more likely to vote Democratic, thus fraudulently denying votes to the party to which God has assigned a divine right to eternal power. Additional security measures will be put in place to ensure that access to the polls is limited to people willing to vote for the "correct" party. |
|
|
| (1168962) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 3 02:53:39 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 3 02:39:22 2014. That "Real Americans™" is incorrect. It's "real *AM*ericans™!"You're welcome. :) |
|
|
| (1168980) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 08:30:28 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 22:28:04 2014. Apparently Bingbong knows the entire state of New York's demographics of voter election board workers too! Oh that's right, she ignored the post to provide proof. Surprise!!! |
|
|
| (1168982) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 08:33:00 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 3 02:39:22 2014. Correct! Democrats are willing to overlook voter fraud as long as it works in their favor. How convenient!! |
|
|
| (1168986) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 08:45:29 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 3 02:39:22 2014. 
|
|
|
| (1168987) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 08:47:11 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 20:27:30 2014. Have you ever been to Israel? And was the question directed to you? |
|
|
| (1168988) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 08:48:03 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Apr 2 20:32:10 2014. You would love to see Israel blown off the face of the earth. |
|
|
| (1168989) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 08:53:25 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 21:26:48 2014. Do you own a photo ID? |
|
|
| (1168990) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 08:54:20 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:28:06 2014. No thanks. We have enough RINOs. |
|
|
| (1168992) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 08:55:50 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:35:04 2014. When's the last meal you missed? |
|
|
| (1168993) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 08:59:05 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 20:29:31 2014. I'm usually issued a receipt. |
|
|
| (1168994) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 09:02:14 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 3 02:53:39 2014. 
|
|
|
| (1168997) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Apr 3 09:13:19 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 08:33:00 2014. Democrats are willing to overlook voter fraud as long as it works in their favor. How convenient!!Where do you see any mention of the party affiliations of the allegedly fraudulent votes? |
|
|
| (1168998) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Apr 3 09:14:45 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:33:18 2014. There's got to be some demographic info, as where else would you know who all NY election workers are?Or you, for that matter. |
|
|
| (1168999) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Apr 3 09:25:18 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:24:05 2014. And yes, you know damn well I didn't mean "85" literally.So what did you mean by "with the huge bifocal prescription glasses that can hardly hear," then? And yes, there is demographic information. Most poll workers are in their 60s; people that age tend to still see and hear well. 
|
|
|
| (1169001) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 09:33:53 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 08:54:20 2014. Well, interestingly, they seem to be thinking that they are helping the Democratic cause when in fact it's quite the opposite with their extremism. |
|
|
| (1169002) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 09:35:13 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Apr 3 09:13:19 2014. No where. But how come you aren't addressing Selkirk with that statement, as he's the one that assumes it's Republicans "trying" to stop Democrats from voting. Are you you even reading the line of messages you are responding to? |
|
|
| (1169003) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 09:36:14 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Apr 3 09:14:45 2014. Of course, but I never claimed that was blanket, but instead my person experience with them. |
|
|
| (1169004) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 09:36:48 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Thu Apr 3 09:25:18 2014. Thank you for showing they are mostly old people. |
|
|
| (1169007) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by fset on Thu Apr 3 10:03:42 2014, in response to North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 2 17:36:24 2014. RE: "...likely voters who moved out of state without notifying their local boards of elections. "Those may be votes we need to remove because they've left North Carolina."WAIT. Do you mean that if I move from NYC to NC, then I have to inform NY that I've left the state? |
|
|
| (1169008) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 10:04:55 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 08:30:28 2014. That's more than you know about it, obviously. |
|
|
| (1169011) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 10:12:49 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 08:55:50 2014. I'll answer that when you answer me.Are you in favor of starving Americans? |
|
|
| (1169012) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 3 10:18:52 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by fset on Thu Apr 3 10:03:42 2014. No, but you're committing a crime if you still vote in NY anyway after you've moved out. |
|
|
| (1169013) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Apr 3 10:25:31 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Train Dude on Wed Apr 2 21:31:09 2014. HA!HA! Dead people can't do anything!! If someone in the family uses the dead's identity to vote, that's totally wrong and that person should be dealt with!! |
|
|
| (1169017) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 10:40:16 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by fset on Thu Apr 3 10:03:42 2014. No, you just have to reregister in your new location, but it's illegal to vote in your old location if you changed your legal address. |
|
|
| (1169020) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 10:47:47 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 09:33:53 2014. ikr |
|
|
| (1169021) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 10:49:11 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 10:04:55 2014. Apparently not, as RIPTA showd stats that show that most are older people. Not "middle aged people that retired early". |
|
|
| (1169022) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 10:49:56 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 10:12:49 2014. Maybe you would get answers when you stop asking absurd extremist questions, meant to troll and shock. |
|
|
| (1169023) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 10:51:02 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Apr 3 10:25:31 2014. Way to miss the point!!
|
|
|
| (1169025) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 10:52:58 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 10:12:49 2014. Of course not. That's an ignorant question. But I just consider the source. |
|
|
| (1169035) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Thu Apr 3 11:25:55 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 08:48:03 2014. IAWTP. |
|
|
| (1169039) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 3 11:51:34 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 08:48:03 2014. No but I'd love to see you get run over by a car :)your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1169047) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:10:40 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 10:49:11 2014. Most are 61-70. There is a course one has to take to do this. It's offered during working hours. Employers aren't going to offer time away from a job to do this.WTF do you think is doing this? |
|
|
| (1169049) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:12:17 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 10:49:56 2014. Maybe you should stop being the absurd extremist you claim you aren't. |
|
|
| (1169050) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:14:02 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 10:52:58 2014. So then you won't be voting republican as that party added that to their midterms agenda. |
|
|
| (1169051) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 12:16:37 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:14:02 2014. I'll vote the way I want to vote, and you vote the way you want to vote, thank you. |
|
|
| (1169052) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 12:18:00 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Dave on Thu Apr 3 11:25:55 2014. Well Thank you. |
|
|
| (1169053) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 12:19:13 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 3 11:51:34 2014. You're my pal, and you want to see me get run over by a car? |
|
|
| (1169054) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:20:10 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 12:16:37 2014. Then you DO support starving Americans. Why did you lie? |
|
|
| (1169055) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 12:20:15 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:10:40 2014. Who is doing it is exactly who I CLAIMED was doing this....Older people.RIPTA's chart shows that most of the people are older people, a group 61-70 is the most as you said, and then there's also a lot 71 AND OLDER. And we have another group that is 41 to 60, which yes, are middle aged, but if you take older people....senior citizens.....MOST are in fact 61 OR OLDER as I claimed. You had claimed Most are in their mid 50's, which is false. |
|
|
| (1169058) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 12:21:35 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:20:10 2014. That is absurd statement, from an absurd person. |
|
|
| (1169059) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 12:21:36 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:12:17 2014. When absurd statements by extremists like you, that claim they aren't, are stopped being made. |
|
|
| (1169060) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 12:22:17 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 12:21:36 2014. iawtlp |
|
|
| (1169061) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:23:35 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 12:20:15 2014. Senior citizens are over 65 technically, but most perceive themselves as such when they hit 70. |
|
|
| (1169062) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 12:24:38 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:23:35 2014. Oh stop it. |
|
|
| (1169063) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:25:40 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Apr 3 12:21:35 2014. Wrong. It's your own admission. Why do you lie like this? It is required of RWers? |
|
|
| (1169064) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:26:31 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 12:24:38 2014. Why? You're wrong, just admit it. |
|
|
| (1169065) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 3 12:26:50 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:23:35 2014. Yeah but we use ages for demographics. Some people are old at 50.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1169067) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 3 12:32:17 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Thu Apr 3 12:26:31 2014. When? The US government considers 65 to be the age. It had been traditionally 65. Senior discounts are provided (for people over 55 actually in many places for discounts, but that's another story).Just because you don't feel like a senior in your 60's, that has been traditionally when people are considered "Seniors". |
|
|
| (1169068) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu Apr 3 12:38:06 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Apr 3 10:25:31 2014. dan, you never seem to disappoint me. I'd love to thank in person you when I'm in Baltimore on April 26th. |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 13 |
||