Home ∑ Maps ∑ About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

First : << [11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20>> : Last

< Previous Page  

Page 13 of 24

Next Page >  

(1161768)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by DAnD124 on Wed Mar 5 10:36:50 2014, in response to Re: dand124 is a communist, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 5 10:34:07 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
lol

Post a New Response

(1161775)

view threaded

Re: dand124 is a communist

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 5 10:39:47 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by DAnD124 on Wed Mar 5 10:36:50 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d

But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus.

The bourgeois sees his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.

He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.
The root of the liberals' War on Women.

Thanks for admitting you're a communist.

Post a New Response

(1161783)

view threaded

Re: dand124 is a communist

Posted by AlM on Wed Mar 5 10:47:52 2014, in response to Re: dand124 is a communist, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 5 10:39:47 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Superb logic!

All liberals are communists.
Dand124 is a liberal.
Therefore dand124 is a communist.


Post a New Response

(1161786)

view threaded

Re: dand124 is a communist

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 5 10:49:09 2014, in response to Re: dand124 is a communist, posted by AlM on Wed Mar 5 10:47:52 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nobody said "all liberals". Except you.

Post a New Response

(1161794)

view threaded

Re: dand124 is a communist

Posted by AlM on Wed Mar 5 10:58:56 2014, in response to Re: dand124 is a communist, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 5 10:49:09 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Your conclusion only follows if that statement is true.


Post a New Response

(1161824)

view threaded

Re: dand124 is a communist

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 5 13:14:27 2014, in response to Re: dand124 is a communist, posted by AlM on Wed Mar 5 10:58:56 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Bull. Your artifice fails to pay regard to the uninformed, useful-idiot types and "kumbaya" types.

Post a New Response

(1161974)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by dAND124 on Wed Mar 5 20:06:54 2014, in response to Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 21 17:08:34 2013.

fiogf49gjkf0d
This was co-engineered by the European Union; donít let their posturing fool you. They are looking for any excuse to form a military union and shut the USA out.

Post a New Response

(1161975)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by dAND124 on Wed Mar 5 20:07:55 2014, in response to Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 21 17:08:34 2013.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The reason why the left hates the US Constitution so much is because it is a reflection of the Ten Commandments to a great deal. Thatís the way the Founding Fathers set it up.

Post a New Response

(1161976)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by dAND124 on Wed Mar 5 20:09:31 2014, in response to Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 21 17:08:34 2013.

fiogf49gjkf0d


Well, I do not think that God will allow Sodom to exist in the midst of the USA whether the governmentís involved or not.


Post a New Response

(1161977)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by dAND124 on Wed Mar 5 20:11:03 2014, in response to Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 21 17:08:34 2013.

fiogf49gjkf0d



Never mind how Truman made the error of firing MacArthur after Red China attacked us in North Korea and he moved to counterattack. That was a real show of weakness there.

Post a New Response

(1162082)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Mar 6 09:51:24 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by dAND124 on Wed Mar 5 20:11:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Guess what!! Nobody cares!!!

Post a New Response

(1162086)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by DAnD124 on Thu Mar 6 10:11:03 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Mar 6 09:51:24 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d


Post a New Response

(1162089)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Mar 6 10:14:00 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by DAnD124 on Thu Mar 6 10:11:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
WRONG AGAIN!!!

Post a New Response

(1162176)

view threaded

Re: Lawrenceology of Terror

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 6 14:24:45 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by DAnD124 on Thu Mar 6 10:11:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Man; he can't even get a break in this thread. LOL!

Post a New Response

(1162214)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Mar 6 15:09:50 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Mar 6 10:14:00 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yes, you are.

Post a New Response

(1162667)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by DAnD124 on Fri Mar 7 22:28:59 2014, in response to Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 21 17:08:34 2013.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The war in Bosnia was a violation of promises made to Russia by George H.W. Bush (IIRC) to wit that there would be no NATO or other western incursions into former Soviet Bloc territory. Of course, this was part of the European Unionís push into that area, since after the Cold War the leadership of NATO was basically handed to them, and Clinton to a great degree was ďleading from behindĒ (actually following).

Yugoslavia was not in the Warsaw pact

Post a New Response

(1162670)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by DAnD124 on Fri Mar 7 22:32:08 2014, in response to Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 21 17:08:34 2013.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The only hope for the nation right now is to turn to God in repentance, because itís evident that divine protection has been withheld thanks to our moral decline; and the Bible says that the next step is God actually fighting against us, which we simply cannot survive.

Post a New Response

(1162683)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by AlM on Fri Mar 7 23:00:03 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by DAnD124 on Fri Mar 7 22:32:08 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I like that one of the guys in that thread has the nerve to call himself nathanbedford. At least he's clear about where he stands.


Post a New Response

(1162684)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Mar 7 23:02:37 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by AlM on Fri Mar 7 23:00:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I had to Google "Nathan Bedford" to know he was a Confederate war hero.



Post a New Response

(1162686)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by Easy on Fri Mar 7 23:04:21 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Mar 7 23:02:37 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I think that he's the guy that Forrest Gump was supposedly named after. And he started the KKK or something.

Post a New Response

(1162687)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by DAnD124 on Fri Mar 7 23:06:22 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by AlM on Fri Mar 7 23:00:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
< href='http://www.freerepublic.com/~nathanbedford/'>here's his profile where he explains his name he says the KKK wasn't that bad

Post a New Response

(1162688)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Mar 7 23:10:24 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by Easy on Fri Mar 7 23:04:21 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Forrest Gump was a great movie.

So I looked up this Bedford guy and he was a badass youth who shot some guys in revenge for shooting his dad during an argument.



Post a New Response

(1162691)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Mar 7 23:55:12 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Mar 7 23:02:37 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL!

Post a New Response

(1162694)

view threaded

Re: dand124 is a communist

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 8 00:39:53 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by DAnD124 on Fri Mar 7 22:28:59 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nobody said "Warsaw Pact" in that post, dandKKK.

Post a New Response

(1162695)

view threaded

Re: "nathanbedford"

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 8 00:42:07 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by DAnD124 on Fri Mar 7 23:06:22 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
He appears to be one of the fringe posters on FR. Pops up during any Pat Buchanan thread, if one looks at his history.

Majority on that site seem to really hate Pat Buchanan, too.

Post a New Response

(1162703)

view threaded

Re: dand124 is a communist

Posted by WillD on Sat Mar 8 01:01:31 2014, in response to Re: dand124 is a communist, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 8 00:39:53 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Then it *really* wasn't part of the Soviet Bloc, especially after the Titov-Stalin split.

Post a New Response

(1162744)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by AlM on Sat Mar 8 07:09:28 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Mar 7 23:02:37 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
There are plenty of Confederate War heroes.

Nathan Bedford Forrest was evidently a decent man but he is generally attributed as being the first Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan (he later renounced the Klan). Do you think that it is a coincidence the guy chose that as his handle? Sort of like choosing Adolph as your handle.


Post a New Response

(1162762)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by DAnD124 on Sat Mar 8 10:56:42 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by AlM on Sat Mar 8 07:09:28 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nathan Bedford Forrest was evidently a decent man but he is generally attributed as being the first Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan


????

Post a New Response

(1162764)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by Easy on Sat Mar 8 11:04:35 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by DAnD124 on Sat Mar 8 10:56:42 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Many of the founding fathers were far worse and they are idolized.

Post a New Response

(1162782)

view threaded

Re: Easology of Terror

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 8 12:07:11 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by Easy on Sat Mar 8 11:04:35 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Worse than what or whom?

Post a New Response

(1162871)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Mar 8 14:16:46 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Mar 7 23:55:12 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Why LOL!?

Why should anyone but a Civil War buff know his name?

Post a New Response

(1162874)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by Easy on Sat Mar 8 14:25:42 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Mar 8 14:16:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
And you call yourself a southerner...smh.

Post a New Response

(1162876)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by AlM on Sat Mar 8 14:30:29 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Mar 8 14:16:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Maybe from reading the NY Times? :)

When I saw nathanbedford, I immediately knew it was a reference to Civil War general Nathan Bedford Forrest, whom I remembered incorrectly as being the founder of the Ku Klux Klan.

He seems to have been a much more decent person than you would generally associate with the Klan.



Post a New Response

(1162877)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Mar 8 14:41:03 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by Easy on Sat Mar 8 14:25:42 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Thanks.

I'm not a southerner. Very northern. Very northern.

Are you lifting today?

Post a New Response

(1162878)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by Easy on Sat Mar 8 14:50:08 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Mar 8 14:41:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nah. I lifted yesterday plus I did cardio. Taking today off, but going on a 7 mile mountain hike tomorrow.

Post a New Response

(1162880)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Mar 8 14:53:39 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by Easy on Sat Mar 8 14:50:08 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
oh man.

that sounds like fun.

Post a New Response

(1162900)

view threaded

Re: MMUN

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 8 15:29:22 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by Easy on Sat Mar 8 14:50:08 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Where did you find mountains?

Post a New Response

(1162901)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Ignorance

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 8 15:31:47 2014, in response to Re: MMUN, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 8 15:29:22 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL!

Post a New Response

(1162904)

view threaded

Re: MMUN

Posted by Easy on Sat Mar 8 15:36:52 2014, in response to Re: MMUN, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 8 15:29:22 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
All over. We're surrounded by them. I'm going to the Santa Monica Mountains.

We have great outdoor weather, but it gets to be kind of a drag that all of our outdoor areas are mountainous. Hikes usually involve at least 500 ft elevation changes. Tomorrow's is 1,200 feet.

Post a New Response

(1162905)

view threaded

Re: MMUN

Posted by AlM on Sat Mar 8 15:38:36 2014, in response to Re: MMUN, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 8 15:29:22 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Huh? He lives in LA.

Mt. Baden-Powell, for example, is a nice day hike to an altitude of 9,400 feet, which is a lot higher than anything in PA.


Post a New Response

(1162908)

view threaded

Re: MMUN

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 8 16:21:50 2014, in response to Re: MMUN, posted by Easy on Sat Mar 8 15:36:52 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You also have beaches.

Post a New Response

(1162912)

view threaded

Re: MMUN

Posted by mtk52983 on Sat Mar 8 16:28:29 2014, in response to Re: MMUN, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 8 15:29:22 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
What does this have to do with Cancun International Airport?

Post a New Response

(1162923)

view threaded

Re: Arachnology of humorlessness

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 8 18:41:04 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Ignorance, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Mar 8 15:31:47 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Some people don't bother to find 'em.

Post a New Response

(1162925)

view threaded

Re: MMUN

Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Mar 8 18:46:16 2014, in response to Re: MMUN, posted by Easy on Sat Mar 8 15:36:52 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That's good that Jerry Brown didn't close off the Hollywood Hills yet.

Post a New Response

(1163165)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 9 16:05:49 2014, in response to Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 21 17:08:34 2013.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Those that throw Alinskyite accusations of being "FOS" and "profoundly insane" are usually suffering from those conditions themselves . . . and are also profoundly anti-Israel.

Post a New Response

(1163166)

view threaded

Re: Quod erat demonstrandum

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Mar 9 16:06:40 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 9 16:05:49 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I'd tell you to stop making yourself look insane, but I doubt you'd listen.

Post a New Response

(1163168)

view threaded

Re: Quod erat demonstrandum

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 9 16:08:36 2014, in response to Re: Quod erat demonstrandum, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Mar 9 16:06:40 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yes. QED is a good ending to this thread, given how DanD and I have thoroughly proved your insanity, but unfortunately it's not over.

Post a New Response

(1163173)

view threaded

Re: Quod erat demonstrandum

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Mar 9 16:10:02 2014, in response to Re: Quod erat demonstrandum, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 9 16:08:36 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL! You've proved your own insanities, to be sure.

Post a New Response

(1163184)

view threaded

Re: Quod erat demonstrandum

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 9 17:13:12 2014, in response to Re: Quod erat demonstrandum, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Mar 9 16:10:02 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Coming from you, that's a compliment.

Post a New Response

(1163598)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by AlM on Tue Mar 11 08:14:20 2014, in response to Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 21 17:08:34 2013.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Refusal to deny when pressed is generally only considered an admission of guilt under authoritarian systems. Applying that to OTChat indicates a particular thought process.


Post a New Response

First : << [11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20>> : Last

< Previous Page  

Page 13 of 24

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]