|
|
| Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack (1067067) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 6 |
||
|
| (1067528) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu May 23 15:28:47 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by kew gardens teleport on Thu May 23 13:42:18 2013. The original New York City was approximately the size you describe. |
|
|
| (1067530) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu May 23 15:31:24 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by kew gardens teleport on Thu May 23 13:27:12 2013. Never mind that terrible European Jacob Zuma, doing the same to South Africa. |
|
|
| (1067535) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 16:09:54 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 15:02:14 2013. True..but only partially..some were kidnapped..some were stolen..some were sold off by their own family..some were prisoners of the tribes cast off as undesirables.. but none of the "but's" mean much to you..you needed to put "sold into slavery by their own.." out there to accomplish What..? prove what kind of point..? |
|
|
| (1067537) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 16:15:48 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Thu May 23 07:02:28 2013. You need to address LUCH about that. I'm speaking to HIM about HIS racism..since he quickly jumped in to rail on "African Muslims=Blacks Africans in his mind".. This heinous act was committed by one radicalized MAN.. His RACE had nothing to do with it... So why dont YOU ask LUCH what one had to do with the other? |
|
|
| (1067539) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 16:30:14 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by LuchAAA on Thu May 23 03:39:48 2013. Damn son..I knew you were stupid..but didnt know the exact extent of it.Sure I COULD name them...but why should I do the work for You're lazy ass? something you should have known from grade school..and you are asking Me? LOL..! I also can make a claim..about how You have ruined the the entire world..murdered..pillaged..raped..subject all to vileness that you go out of you way to rewrite history to make YOU seem to be angels,not devils! You even murder your own under the guise of "ethnic cleansing" A MAN WAS MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD..by a lunatic.. and I didnt give a damn about what color they were..yet you could wait to jump on that. pig. |
|
|
| (1067541) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 16:41:07 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 15:20:01 2013. Hmm..you mean like the last one we had..the fella who has so much blood on his hands that he can NEVER get clean?the fella that lied to all of us to attack a country..kill off thousands..all over some illusion about his "daddy"? the same daddy who was in business with the folks who attacked us? or could it be like that other guy,"Ronny Ray-gun"..who did PLENTY of business with terrorist..but couldn't "recall" anything when questioned..throwing North under the bus? yeah..who would want to see men like those lead this country? liars, thieves..cheats..murderers..all excellent ideals to keep us on top. wow. |
|
|
| (1067542) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 16:42:45 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Olog-hai on Thu May 23 15:28:47 2013. Proof? |
|
|
| (1067543) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 16:44:57 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by LuchAAA on Thu May 23 01:23:15 2013. damn racist pig. |
|
|
| (1067544) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 16:47:24 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by LuchAAA on Thu May 23 01:48:02 2013. why are you so afraid of blacks?were you picked on? someone take your lunch money? hmmm...i see..someone took you LUNCH MONEY. why didnt you get help? |
|
|
| (1067545) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu May 23 17:01:19 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 16:42:45 2013. Wall Steet meant what it said. It was the wall at the northern end of the city. |
|
|
| (1067546) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 17:02:06 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by LuchAAA on Thu May 23 03:41:17 2013. Sad as hell.pathetic. i believe you are the prime example of the "wet paper bag" syndrome.. keep up the good work. |
|
|
| (1067547) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 17:08:08 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by AlM on Thu May 23 17:01:19 2013. lol..i knew New Amsterdam was a walled SETTLEMENT.. not city. |
|
|
| (1067554) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 17:56:43 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 16:09:54 2013. To refute your claim blaming the Europeans which is not accurate, either. I realize that rhetoric trumps accuracy is the liberal world, so carry on. |
|
|
| (1067556) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:01:11 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 16:41:07 2013. I guess obama's record cannot stand alone in your mind. He needs to be contrasted against your memory of George W. Bush or Ronald Reagan, both of whom were man enough to face down terrorism.As for doing business with terrorists, let us not forget clinton did business with the same people and obama's foreign policy, time after time, has come down on the wrong side of the issue. Of course, his buddy Bill Ayres was a terrorist so we know where his sentiments lie. |
|
|
| (1067557) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:03:29 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Edwards! on Thu May 23 16:47:24 2013. Why do you seem to attribute those behaviors to blacks? That seems racist to me. |
|
|
| (1067559) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 18:06:52 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:01:11 2013. You mean like how Reagan turned tail and fled Lebanon after the Marine barracks were blown up?your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1067563) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by kew gardens teleport on Thu May 23 18:09:57 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by AlM on Thu May 23 14:36:05 2013. Because it's Britain. The siren only goes on when they need to get their fish and chips, or to stop someone for a minor driving infraction. |
|
|
| (1067566) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:14:42 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 18:06:52 2013. Was Reagan in Lebanon at the time? I don't recall.Of course that's a rhetorical question, Fred. You do remember that occurred in October of 1983 and it led to the removal of an international peace-keeping force based there. You do remember that in April of 1986, Operation El Dorado Canyon where the US Air Force, Navy and Marines, under President Ronald Reagan, retaliated quite convincingly for the marine barracks and other terror attacks attributed to Qadaffi. That doesn't seem like a president who ran, does it? |
|
|
| (1067571) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu May 23 18:20:47 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:14:42 2013. Was Obama in London? Gotta love that right wing science. :) |
|
|
| (1067573) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu May 23 18:25:32 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 18:06:52 2013. No need to bring in Reagan by nsme. The facts are simple: US installations abroad have been more successfully protected under Obama than under any of the previous 4 administrations.Still, there is obviously room for improvement, as Benghazi shows, and the CIA and State Department need to work together to make that improvement happen. |
|
|
| (1067575) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 18:25:51 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:14:42 2013. That's not how it happenedThere was no serious retaliation for the Beirut bombing from the Americans,[22] besides a few shellings. In December 1983, U.S. aircraft from the USS John F. Kennedy and USS Independence battle groups attacked Syrian targets in Lebanon, but this was ostensibly in response to Syrian missile attacks on American warplanes. Multi-service ground-support units were withdrawn from Beirut after the attack on the barracks due to retaliatory threats. In the meantime, the attack boosted the prestige and growth of the Shi'ite organization Hezbollah. Hezbollah officially denied any involvement in the attacks, but was seen by Lebanese as involved nonetheless as it praised the "two martyr mujahideen" who "set out to inflict upon the U.S. Administration an utter defeat, not experienced since Vietnam."[23] Hezbollah was now seen by many as "the spearhead of the sacred Muslim struggle against foreign occupation".[24] later in the article: The U.S. Marines were moved offshore where they could not be targeted. On February 7, 1984, President Reagan ordered the marines to begin withdrawing from Lebanon. Their withdrawal was completed on February 26, four months after the barracks bombing; the rest of the multinational force was withdrawn by April 1984. Gaddafi was a separate matter. your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1067576) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu May 23 18:27:46 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by AlM on Thu May 23 18:25:32 2013. Yeah, heaven forfend our mighty republicans do what FRANCE did about Benghazi. :(http://www.ngrguardiannews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=122474:france-to-spend-20m-on-security-in-embassies-after-attack-&catid=76:world&Itemid=560 Much easier to just blame Obama and pocket the difference. |
|
|
| (1067577) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu May 23 18:28:55 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 18:25:51 2013. I guess Pan Am 103 had nothing to do with that. And yet these republicans snort about "facts" and "truth" ... LOL! |
|
|
| (1067578) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:28:59 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 18:25:51 2013. Well, Bill Clinton took care of that when he blew up that Somali Aspirin factory. The fact is that there was more retaliation under Reagan than we've seen under obie. |
|
|
| (1067579) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu May 23 18:29:45 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:28:59 2013. Changing the subject? Heh.Your pal, "Walter" |
|
|
| (1067580) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 18:33:33 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:28:59 2013. The attack on the Marines was the worst since Iwo Jima and yet there was no retaliation from the US.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1067582) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:40:50 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 18:33:33 2013. So lets assume Reagan was 100% wrong and should have launched an all out assault and didn't, how does that justify the "soft on terrorists" policy of the ball-mess weasel-in-chief that we expect leadership from. The FBI has had 18 suspects under surveillance since the Benghazi attack. The "president" wants enough evidence so they can be convicted in a civilian trial. Why have they not been targeted by drones.The Ft. Hood terrorist is being charged with workplace violence. He continues to draw a full salary while the victims and the country suffer through endless motions and delays because this "president" is afraid to confront terrorism. Where is the retaliation? If you want to use Reagan as an excuse, then I suppose that no president, now or in the future should ever respond to terrorism. |
|
|
| (1067584) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 18:48:19 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:40:50 2013. Oh please.You made the claim that Reagan would have handled the terrorists so much more courageously than Obama and I proved you wrong. Then comes your litany of deflections, as usual. Your examples are beside the point, which was that Reagan was so much better a warrior on terrorism. We can discuss Ft Hood and the 18 suspects another time. your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1067591) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 19:13:53 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 18:48:19 2013. I didn't mention Reagan, first. You did. You tried to justify obama's weakness by recounting one instance, out of the context of the time, 30 years ago. This "president" is soft on terror and no amount of deflection on your part is going to change that. |
|
|
| (1067623) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu May 23 20:25:43 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 19:13:53 2013. This president has done more to fight terrorism than any of the previous presidents. |
|
|
| (1067628) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 20:32:42 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 19:13:53 2013. baloney :)Where you said He needs to be contrasted against your memory of George W. Bush or Ronald Reagan, both of whom were man enough to face down terrorism. I chipped away at your Reagan mythology. your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1067634) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 20:48:29 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 20:32:42 2013. You are correct. It was edwards who raised the issue of Reagan and it was to him that my original reply was directed. I still did not raise the issue of Reagan first. |
|
|
| (1067645) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 22:24:37 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by AlM on Thu May 23 18:25:32 2013. I didn't introduce Reagan to the argument but responded to the claim that he handled terrorists better than Obama does.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1067651) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu May 23 23:19:26 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by kew gardens teleport on Thu May 23 18:09:57 2013. I think it's insane that cops don't have guns but your gov't has allowed so many Arab and Black Sub-Saharan Africans to populate your country. The demographic shift makes the job so much more dangerous. Makes the country more dangerous. |
|
|
| (1067657) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Fri May 24 00:37:07 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 22:24:37 2013. train fuse always had a fractured sense of historical deference when it comes to politics. he rather lean heavy of the right than see the real issues.for Gods sake,hes okay with what Bush/Cheney did to the whole damn country.he benefited most handsomely. |
|
|
| (1067658) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Fri May 24 00:41:52 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:03:29 2013. you dont know what "seems" mean..so in reality..you lack an opinion worth merit.reading most of your bullshit today..confirmed your "wet paper bag" issues. oh..thought you weren't going to "respond to any of my post in the future".. what happen to that? need to get even? did you have Your lunch money stolen too? we keep watching while you keep pounding.soggy man. |
|
|
| (1067659) | |
Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Fri May 24 00:43:30 2013, in response to Re: Picture of scumbag perp: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:03:29 2013. trading comprehension isn't your strong point..so please stop before you hurt yourself. |
|
|
| (1067675) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 02:34:26 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 15:20:01 2013. The Justice Department is not in charge of the investigation and prosecution of the Ft. Hood case and never was. |
|
|
| (1067676) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 02:38:48 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:01:11 2013. Ronald Reagan, both of whom were man enough to face down terrorism.LOL! he was the greatest friend Muslim terrorists ever had. He fled Lebanon and then sold weapons to those who blew up the USMC barracks but not before saving Arafat's ass from Israel who had PLO HQs surrounded and shuttling out of Beirut.....and oh, who can forget this: 
|
|
|
| (1067677) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri May 24 02:39:47 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 02:34:26 2013. are you aware that the Americans shot by Muslim soldier Hasan can't get certain benefits because they are considered victims of workplace violence instead of casualties of combat? |
|
|
| (1067678) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 02:41:21 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:14:42 2013. Remeber when Gaddafi then responsed by blowing up a Pan Am flight and Reagan didn't do jack shit?Remember when George W, Bush then established diplomatic relations with Gaddafi and sent notorious war criminal Condi Rice there to praise him? Remember when my Presdient, Barack Obama had Gaddafi killed? |
|
|
| (1067679) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 02:50:03 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by LuchAAA on Fri May 24 02:39:47 2013. That's the LAW.some bureaucrat at DoD or the VA can't just change the law just because he wants to. Those that were shot don't get Purple Hearts either. So what's your point? They will still get service-connected disability. |
|
|
| (1067680) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri May 24 02:51:55 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 02:50:03 2013. that's my point.they should not be considered victims of workplace violence. categorizing them as such is an insult, and another victory for the enemy. |
|
|
| (1067681) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 02:58:40 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by LuchAAA on Fri May 24 02:51:55 2013. So write your congressman and get him to change the law.DoD or VA bureaucrats can't make laws. Congress does. |
|
|
| (1067682) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri May 24 03:08:20 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 02:58:40 2013. political correctness is why the victims don't get a purple heart. |
|
|
| (1067683) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 03:29:23 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by LuchAAA on Fri May 24 03:08:20 2013. The LAW is why the victims don't get a Purple Heart.The law regulating the criteria for the awarding of that decoration is VERY specific (and for very good reason) with ZERO room for subjective interpretation and that strict criteria goes back DECADES. |
|
|
| (1067684) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri May 24 03:37:54 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 03:29:23 2013. but it's not workplace violence. an enemy combatant of Islam shot those soldiers. |
|
|
| (1067686) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 03:42:23 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by LuchAAA on Fri May 24 03:37:54 2013. A fellow member of the United States Army shot those soldiers.Officers in Vietnam didn't get Purple Hearts when they got fragged or when some American soldiers beat the shit out of them. |
|
|
| (1067687) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Fri May 24 03:44:54 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by SMAZ on Fri May 24 03:42:23 2013. A fellow memberLOL. Ok. You still don't recognize the enemy. |
|
|
| (1067688) | |
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri May 24 04:08:03 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Edwards! on Fri May 24 00:37:07 2013. If you condone over 4000 dead in Iraq based on a lie but think 4 dead in Benghazi means impeachment then you got bullshit ethics.Your pal, Fred |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 6 |
||